Idiocy
https://hotair.com/archives/2018/04/09/coming-london-knife-control/
Khan wrote:"There is never a reason to carry a knife."
Really?
How about if you are going camping, or to a job site where you have to remove plastic sheathing and bands from palettes loaded with supplies, or you're a chef and heading to work, or you have to go into a bad part of town and the government won't allow you to carry a gun?
Somehow I suspect the men who are assigned to guard Khan are armed and with more than knives.
Quote:Khan has approved “targeted patrols with extra stop and search powers for areas worst-affected by knife crime”
Rudy called it "stop & frisk" and the Mayor of London has condemned it as rascist. Now it's OK to impose racist policies though?
Khan in 2015 wrote:I’d do everything in my power to cut stop and search
Khan wrote:...if I’m Mayor I’ll do all in my power to further cut its use. Overuse of stop and search can have a dramatic effect on communities. It undermines public confidence in our police if Londoners are being stopped and searched for no good reason.
”
Oh, I get it. Khan never said it was all bad, just that he wanted to dramatically curtail the practice. Apparently, he's now able to provide instructions to the city's police force as to precisely when it is ok to stop that old lady from Scotland and give her a good frisking.
What's that? This is a silly comment? Well, the perpetrators of these increasing violent crimes are disproportionately young male Muslims, and one would think that in order for
stop & search to be effective, the police need to profile those selected for a frisking and guess who will fit the profile? Not elderly women from Scotland, but once the number of young Muslim males stopped and searched reaches critical mass (I'd say that's about two young men) London's Muslims and left-wingers will be screaming bloody murder. Khan will lose face if he backs down at the first sign of resistance so the only answer is to make sure that just as many people not fitting the profile are stopped and searched as those that do.
Quote:The U.K. government is expected to introduce a ban on online knife sales and home knife deliveries, declare it “illegal to possess zombie knives and knuckledusters in private”
As previously reported, NY has this same law banning online knife purchases and home deliveries. Seems odd doesn't it? Why not just ban the purchase of any knife, anywhere? Is that still a bridge too far for liberals?
Oh wait, they are going to ban ownership of certain knives (it's a riot that they refer to them as "zombie knives") regardless of whether or not you carry them out of your home. The thinking must be that when it comes to
zombie knives and
knuckledusters (whatever they are)
the entirety of the UK citizenry can't be trusted not to take theirs for a walk outside of their homes.Therefore, just like unruly children, they can't be allowed to even have them in their homes to protect themselves from criminals who don't give a damn about silly laws and will bring their zombies, their guns, and their acid along with them whenever they go out to perform their
jobs
Quote:Some stores now demand proof of identity even to buy blunt-nosed plastic knives,
Of course they do. Whenever there is a panicked government rushing to pass laws of prohibition that have little to no chance of being effective, shopkeepers know full well that when the laws prove they have no balls, the lawmakers are not going to admit they ball-free laws, they are going to look for scapegoats, so the smart and potentially proactive remedy is extreme compliance. It's why the clerks in every supermarket in my locale require me to show them my ID, even if a) only a blind person could possibly mistake me for someone under the age of 21 and b) have to enter my date of birth into their register. You never know a kid seeking to buy beer at the local Tom Thumb might be enrolled in a stage makeup class and decide to expertly disguise himself as a 64-year-old man with thinning grey hair and a white beard.
Note that none of these measures seems to have had an iota of impact on the scourge of knife violence.
Of course, they don't. Just like laying out concrete barriers in the streets haven't stopped evil lunatics from mowing down people with trucks and banning certain high-powered guns haven't stopped terrorists and organized criminals from obtaining them.
Quote:People who commit these attacks have not been deterred by more intrusive police actions, which have been ramping up for some time. The police can’t be everywhere at once, which means that those in London or thinking of visiting it have to be prepared to defend themselves. When someone comes at you with a knife, simply yelling and running may not be enough, especially when the intent isn’t to rob a victim of their goods but to rob them of their lives.
Sounds like good old common sense, but it can't be because those who impose these laws of prohibition, and the folks who support, them don't put much weight at all in the notion that without a weapon, or 20 years of training in the martial arts, the average law-abiding citizen is entirely vulnerable to someone else who is armed and wants to rob and/or do them harm.
Their city streets are not that dangerous, and only would be Rambos who have a sexual fetish for ammo and knives feel the need to walk them armed for defense. This, of course, is in spite of the fact that these draconian laws are always in response
to increased rates of violent crimes.
Quote:Khan’s demand for a knife ban — and especially the intent of the UK to prevent people from buying perfectly ordinary knives on line — smacks of desperation and impotence. Rather than knife bans, perhaps London needs new leadership.
BINGO! We have a winner!
This is why whenever I'm walking the streets of a city or town, I carry a knife, and I've done so twice a year for the last 10 years that I've been visiting London on business. I pack my knived in check luggage and have never run into a problem. I make sure that my knives meet the local regulations. In London and New York, I carry one of the following two knives.
This is a higonokami; handmade by Nagao Seisakusho in Japan. The blade is just shy of 3 inches long and does not lock in the open position. It is not a zombie knife as it has been the gold standard of workingman's knives for Japanese farmers and fishermen for over 100 years. It has a wickedly sharp edge and the blade is a
tanto which is designed to have a very sharp point. I would have to be in close contact with an attacker to be able to injure him two or three slices in the right places will result in a lot of bleeding which I hope will be enough to send the person running. It's also a dangerous looking knife and my first hope is that just seeing it in my hand will cause a mugger to think twice.
This is a Lansky LKN444 Madrock Tactical Folding Knife designed by Danish knifemaker, Mikkel Willumsen. It is marketed as meeting the concealed carry laws of every country in the world. I don't know if this is true but it does comply with UK regulations (although I think it would be better if they did not inscribe the words "urban tactical" on the blade). It too is wickedly sharp, but the design is not perfect for stabbing and that's a plus in terms of dealing with the law. In person, the blade looks bigger than that of the of the higonokami, but it's the exact same length. It is more vulnerable to the law than the Japanese knife but it is also more intimidating and that's what I am hoping will do the trick. I have no desire to get into a knife fight or any kind of fight with a mugger so I am hoping for intimidation, but I also have no desire to be defenseless if confronted by a mugger.
Thankfully, I've never had an occasion to remove either knife from concealment during any of the night time walks I've made, alone. from a restaurant to pub to my hotel, but I have felt far more secure than I would otherwise. I would rather take my chances with the London police than a London mugger.