13
   

What’s up in London? Murder rate surpassed NY

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 10 Apr, 2018 01:16 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
London mayor urged cross-party focus after criticism that police funding cuts have led to surge


What a bunch of crap. More lip service and denial. It is comical.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 10 Apr, 2018 01:58 pm
Quote:
London’s Jihadi Mayor Moves Totalitarian State Forward in UK

Another opinion, a fact based opinion.

Quote:
In classic splinter movement style, London’s jihadi mayor is calling for the complete defanging of British subjects in preparation for the coming war against them by the Islamic Movement in the United Kingdom.


Quote:
In light of the facts and evidence in Britain that shooting, knife, and acid attacks are primarily being conducted by muslims against non-muslims or muslims who are not sharia-adherent, we see a clear unfolding of the Islamic strategy England as a reflection of what we see unrolling here in the United States.

Muslims conduct attacks in London against non-muslims and muslims who are not adhering to Islamic law (sharia).
The London mayor calls for Britons to be left completely defenseless by outlawing the possession of any tool with which they can defend themselves.
As a result of muslim “Outreach” programs, British police agencies continue to ignore thousands of rape cases against British girls and women because the perpetrators are primarily muslim.


https://www.understandingthethreat.com/londons-jihadi-mayor/
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 12:55 am
Idiocy

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/04/09/coming-london-knife-control/

Khan wrote:
"There is never a reason to carry a knife."


Really?

How about if you are going camping, or to a job site where you have to remove plastic sheathing and bands from palettes loaded with supplies, or you're a chef and heading to work, or you have to go into a bad part of town and the government won't allow you to carry a gun?

Somehow I suspect the men who are assigned to guard Khan are armed and with more than knives.

Quote:
Khan has approved “targeted patrols with extra stop and search powers for areas worst-affected by knife crime”


Rudy called it "stop & frisk" and the Mayor of London has condemned it as rascist. Now it's OK to impose racist policies though?

Khan in 2015 wrote:
I’d do everything in my power to cut stop and search


Khan wrote:
...if I’m Mayor I’ll do all in my power to further cut its use. Overuse of stop and search can have a dramatic effect on communities. It undermines public confidence in our police if Londoners are being stopped and searched for no good reason.


Oh, I get it. Khan never said it was all bad, just that he wanted to dramatically curtail the practice. Apparently, he's now able to provide instructions to the city's police force as to precisely when it is ok to stop that old lady from Scotland and give her a good frisking.

What's that? This is a silly comment? Well, the perpetrators of these increasing violent crimes are disproportionately young male Muslims, and one would think that in order for stop & search to be effective, the police need to profile those selected for a frisking and guess who will fit the profile? Not elderly women from Scotland, but once the number of young Muslim males stopped and searched reaches critical mass (I'd say that's about two young men) London's Muslims and left-wingers will be screaming bloody murder. Khan will lose face if he backs down at the first sign of resistance so the only answer is to make sure that just as many people not fitting the profile are stopped and searched as those that do.

Quote:
The U.K. government is expected to introduce a ban on online knife sales and home knife deliveries, declare it “illegal to possess zombie knives and knuckledusters in private”


As previously reported, NY has this same law banning online knife purchases and home deliveries. Seems odd doesn't it? Why not just ban the purchase of any knife, anywhere? Is that still a bridge too far for liberals?

Oh wait, they are going to ban ownership of certain knives (it's a riot that they refer to them as "zombie knives") regardless of whether or not you carry them out of your home. The thinking must be that when it comes to zombie knives and knuckledusters (whatever they are) the entirety of the UK citizenry can't be trusted not to take theirs for a walk outside of their homes.Therefore, just like unruly children, they can't be allowed to even have them in their homes to protect themselves from criminals who don't give a damn about silly laws and will bring their zombies, their guns, and their acid along with them whenever they go out to perform their jobs

Quote:
Some stores now demand proof of identity even to buy blunt-nosed plastic knives,


Of course they do. Whenever there is a panicked government rushing to pass laws of prohibition that have little to no chance of being effective, shopkeepers know full well that when the laws prove they have no balls, the lawmakers are not going to admit they ball-free laws, they are going to look for scapegoats, so the smart and potentially proactive remedy is extreme compliance. It's why the clerks in every supermarket in my locale require me to show them my ID, even if a) only a blind person could possibly mistake me for someone under the age of 21 and b) have to enter my date of birth into their register. You never know a kid seeking to buy beer at the local Tom Thumb might be enrolled in a stage makeup class and decide to expertly disguise himself as a 64-year-old man with thinning grey hair and a white beard.

Note that none of these measures seems to have had an iota of impact on the scourge of knife violence.

Of course, they don't. Just like laying out concrete barriers in the streets haven't stopped evil lunatics from mowing down people with trucks and banning certain high-powered guns haven't stopped terrorists and organized criminals from obtaining them.

Quote:
People who commit these attacks have not been deterred by more intrusive police actions, which have been ramping up for some time. The police can’t be everywhere at once, which means that those in London or thinking of visiting it have to be prepared to defend themselves. When someone comes at you with a knife, simply yelling and running may not be enough, especially when the intent isn’t to rob a victim of their goods but to rob them of their lives.


Sounds like good old common sense, but it can't be because those who impose these laws of prohibition, and the folks who support, them don't put much weight at all in the notion that without a weapon, or 20 years of training in the martial arts, the average law-abiding citizen is entirely vulnerable to someone else who is armed and wants to rob and/or do them harm. Their city streets are not that dangerous, and only would be Rambos who have a sexual fetish for ammo and knives feel the need to walk them armed for defense. This, of course, is in spite of the fact that these draconian laws are always in response to increased rates of violent crimes.

Quote:
Khan’s demand for a knife ban — and especially the intent of the UK to prevent people from buying perfectly ordinary knives on line — smacks of desperation and impotence. Rather than knife bans, perhaps London needs new leadership.


BINGO! We have a winner!

This is why whenever I'm walking the streets of a city or town, I carry a knife, and I've done so twice a year for the last 10 years that I've been visiting London on business. I pack my knived in check luggage and have never run into a problem. I make sure that my knives meet the local regulations. In London and New York, I carry one of the following two knives.

http://www.higonokami-knife.com/img/Higonokami-Black-Shirogami-Sword-Blade.JPG

This is a higonokami; handmade by Nagao Seisakusho in Japan. The blade is just shy of 3 inches long and does not lock in the open position. It is not a zombie knife as it has been the gold standard of workingman's knives for Japanese farmers and fishermen for over 100 years. It has a wickedly sharp edge and the blade is a tanto which is designed to have a very sharp point. I would have to be in close contact with an attacker to be able to injure him two or three slices in the right places will result in a lot of bleeding which I hope will be enough to send the person running. It's also a dangerous looking knife and my first hope is that just seeing it in my hand will cause a mugger to think twice.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81mnBNok3XL._SL1500_.jpg

This is a Lansky LKN444 Madrock Tactical Folding Knife designed by Danish knifemaker, Mikkel Willumsen. It is marketed as meeting the concealed carry laws of every country in the world. I don't know if this is true but it does comply with UK regulations (although I think it would be better if they did not inscribe the words "urban tactical" on the blade). It too is wickedly sharp, but the design is not perfect for stabbing and that's a plus in terms of dealing with the law. In person, the blade looks bigger than that of the of the higonokami, but it's the exact same length. It is more vulnerable to the law than the Japanese knife but it is also more intimidating and that's what I am hoping will do the trick. I have no desire to get into a knife fight or any kind of fight with a mugger so I am hoping for intimidation, but I also have no desire to be defenseless if confronted by a mugger.

Thankfully, I've never had an occasion to remove either knife from concealment during any of the night time walks I've made, alone. from a restaurant to pub to my hotel, but I have felt far more secure than I would otherwise. I would rather take my chances with the London police than a London mugger.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 01:05 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Why do you all from the American right point to and just focuse on Khan as the present mayor of London?

The mayor of London doesn't make laws in the UK, neither for the whole country nor for England and Wales.

Sadiq Khan jus presented a new strategy because of his predecessors didn't work (in Scotland, under Scottish law, it was differently).

The former mayor's strategy:
Boris Johnson youth violence strategy: 'sabotaged' and 'a shambles' his experts say
roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 02:06 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
I gotta confess. My every day carry is a Buck with a 1 3/4" blade. It's on a key ring. The truly evil part is that it not only locks in the closed position, it also locks OPEN.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 03:04 am
@roger,
The only knife I own and use occasionally is my old navy knife.

https://i.imgur.com/VBCmbX7m.jpg

Actually, it isn't my knife - that not only was beat-up after 15 years in use privately [and sometimes 'officially'] but I had to give it back with my uniform - but a predecessor model, made by my father-in-law in the 1950's for a different firm than his own knife manufactory
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 10:05 am
@roger,
roger wrote:

I gotta confess. My every day carry is a Buck with a 1 3/4" blade. It's on a key ring. The truly evil part is that it not only locks in the closed position, it also locks OPEN.


Small enough but that locking mechanism that protects your fingers means you are a blood-thirsty thug. Don't bring it to the UK.

Besides, why do you need an EDC knife? Didn't you read what Mayor Khan had to say? No one needs to carry a knife...no one!
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 10:19 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Besides, why do you need an EDC knife? Didn't you read what Mayor Khan had to say? No one needs to carry a knife...no one!


This is a joke. The people that use those knives are the problem, not the knives.
The failure of multiculture because of Islam is the root of the problem.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 11:05 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Why do you all from the American right point to and just focuse on Khan as the present mayor of London?


I don't know, possibly because he is the present mayor of London?

Why do you all from the European left point to and just focus on Trump?

BTW, the column I linked covers what Parliament is doing about knives too. You seem to usually read what it linked, but I guess you didn't this time.

As the present Mayor of London, does Khan not have the authority to pull back on or expand the stop & search procedure? If not, then he is blowing a lot of smoke up the arses of Londoners.

As the present Mayor of London, are Khan's tweets not intended to influence the thinking of the citizens of London?

As the present Mayor of London, is Khan not charged with the responsibility to enforce the laws passed by Parliament?

If the present Mayor of London is not a powerful political figure who can significantly impact the lives of those that live in his city, just what is his job, and why does anyone care what he says or does?

I very strongly suspect that you believe I and the American Right focus on Khan for one reason and one reason only: He's a Muslim. After all, we only focused on Obama because he is black

Projection can be socially debilitating and blind you to your own faults Walter. You should discuss this with your therapist.

Just to shore up your regard for me, let me unequivocally state the following:

I don't give a rat's ass what Khan's religion, ethnicity, sexual proclivities, skin color, dietary practices, preferred movie genre, exercise regimen, or favorite football team are. I only care about his political ideology. As hard as it may be to believe, it's also the only aspect of Obama I cared about.

If Khan was a homosexual, vegetarian who take pilates classes, prefers Romantic Comedies, is mad for the Pakistani national football squad, AND was a conservative, odds are I would regard him favorably...at least as a political and governing figure.

Similarly, Obama could have been a lily-white fan of the NY Yankees and Carolina Panthers with an Irish/English/Scandinavian/German heritage who listens to Steely Dan, The Band, Jeff Beck and Bach, loves Indian food and bone-in NY Strip steaks, drinks Manhattans, reads SCI-FI and watches "Big Trouble in Little China" whenever it is on TV, AND I still would have had disdain for the vast majority of his policies, and deeply regretted his presidency.

And here's another earth-shaking revelation for you Walter, most American conservatives feel the same way as I do.

I don't know which it is with you lefties: 1) You just can resist fighting dirty with innuendos and direct accusations of racism or 2) You are so arrogantly self-absorbed that you can't believe anyone can reasonably disagree with your left-wing positions on the merits and so conclude that opposition to those positions must be driven by base motivations such as racism, greed or just plain evil.

Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 11:15 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Why do you all from the European left point to and just focus on Trump?
Why do you just name "the European left"?
Doo you really think, someone compares the importance of the Mayor of London with that of the President of the United States of America? (Leaving out here Ken Livingstone).
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
As the present Mayor of London, does Khan not have the authority to pull back on or expand the stop & search procedure? If not, then he is blowing a lot of smoke up the arses of Londoners.
No. The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis is the head of London's Metropolitan Police Service.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
As the present Mayor of London, are Khan's tweets not intended to influence the thinking of the citizens of London?
I don't know his intends, but it might well be so.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
As the present Mayor of London, is Khan not charged with the responsibility to enforce the laws passed by Parliament?
Not really, and certainly only with those related to the entirety of Greater London. (see: Greater London Authority Act 1999)
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 11:42 am
@Walter Hinteler,
If you had asked those questions regarding the Michael Müller, then my answers would be different: Müller is the Governing Mayor of Berlin, the head of government, presiding over the Berlin Senate. Berlin is an independent city as well as one of the States of Germany, thus Berlin's mayor is comparable to the one of chancellor at the federal level.
(The same is with Hamburg [First Mayor as prime minister] and Bremen [there, the prime minister is called President of the Senate and Mayor of the Free Hanseatic City of Bremen.)
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 11:53 am
@Walter Hinteler,
But coming back to London and the Mayor of London.
In short: Sadiq Khan doesn’t actually have much power.
- the mayor runs the city’s transport networks through his role as chair of TfL,
- he oversees London’s land use strategy, by publishing the London Plan.

Beyond that, though, it’s surprisingly hard to pin down what he can actually do. Unlike a mayors in e.g. New York, Khan has more soft power than hard cash.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 12:38 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
London borough councils provide the majority of local government services, in contrast to the strategic Greater London Authority (executive: executive Mayor of London), which has limited authority over all of Greater London (see my above response).
There are 32 London boroughs as local authority districts.
The 33rd is the City of London, with on own police force separated from Met (the City of London Police), a small resident population (around 12,000) more than 300,000 commuters and visitors each weekday, and the Lord Mayor of London (not the same as the more recent Mayor of London) heads the City of London Corporation.

I suppose, you actually know all that, Finn, since you've been to London perhaps more often than I did and certainly know more than persons there, especially in and from the City of London. And I don't think you have a limited view of the world like other people, you certainly have looked over the edge of your plate.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  2  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2018 02:47 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:


Besides, why do you need an EDC knife? Didn't you read what Mayor Khan had to say? No one needs to carry a knife...no one!


Ever try to open one of those little packages of donuts from 7/11?
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2018 06:39 am
@roger,
Knife crime in England and Wales increases by largest margin ever, reveal official figures
Quote:
Office for National Statistics warn of 'genuine increase' in violence after government attributes rise to improved recording

Knife crime rocketed by 22 per cent across England and Wales in the largest jump ever recorded, new figures have revealed amid a spate of stabbings in London.

Almost 40,000 offences involving knives or sharp weapons were recorded by police in 2017 - the highest level in seven years - while gun crime was up 11 per cent to 6,600 offences.

Alexa Bradley, an Office for National Statistics (ONS) analyst, said most crimes have remained fairly stable in the past year and at a much lower level than a peak seen in the mid-1990s.

"Eight in ten adults had not experienced any of the crimes asked about in our survey in the latest year,” he added.

"However, we have seen an increase in the relatively rare, but 'high-harm' violent offences such as homicide, knife crime and gun crime, a trend that has been emerging over the previous two years.

"We have also seen evidence that increases in some types of theft have continued, in particular vehicle-related theft and burglary.”

The ONS told The Independent that the 22 per cent increase in knife offences was the biggest year-on-year rise on record.

Sexual offences recorded by police were up a quarter in the year, with rape increasing by 31 per cent to more than 50,000 offences, and domestic abuse-related crimes were also up.

The Crime Survey of England and Wales, which is seen as the most reliable indicator of long-term trends, shows crime has fallen overall in recent years but the ONS warned of “genuine increases” in violence.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2018 11:47 pm
@Walter Hinteler,

Why is violent crime on the rise – and who is most at risk?

Quote:
Knife and gun crime has surged in England and Wales, but the causes and solutions are unclear

Reports of violence, stabbings and murders have hit the headlines in recent months, with daily occurrences in London. But how widespread is violent crime, why is it growing and who are the victims?

The vast majority of people will not be a victim of violent crime. In England and Wales, four in five people did not experience crime in 2017 and overall crime has been steadily decreasing since 1995.

Although people are experiencing fewer high-harm incidents, including offences involving knives and firearms, in 2017 there was a 22% increase in knife crime and an 11% rise in gun crime, according to offences recorded by the police. These crimes don’t occur very often, but they do attract a lot of media attention.
[...]
While the figures suggest serious violence is on the rise, there is no consensus about the causes or solutions. The latest Home Office policy targeting violent crime points to changes in the nature of drug sales and use, highlighting crack cocaine, social media and music glamorising violence as among the issues fuelling the problem.

However, policy experts and criminologists put the increase down to a combination of complex factors, and say longer-term public health-style approaches may be key to reducing serious violence.

Simon Harding, associate professor in criminology at the University of West London, says the rise is partly because of cuts to youth services and police community support officers (PCSOs).
[...]
Although most people will never experience serious violent crime, figures indicate young black men are disproportionately the victims of knife crime, particularly in London.

“I think this has been one of the problems with policy: we say our risk of being a victim of violence is much lower, but who are ‘we’ and who are we not including in that category?” says Richard Garside, director at the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

“There are particular age groups and localities where, to put it bluntly, being young and male – and particularly being young, male and black in some parts of London and other major cities – is potentially lethal in and of itself. They are at much higher risk of being a victim of a violent assault than the general population.”

Garside is urging a rethink of how we respond to violence in society, possibly with a longer-term public health-style approach.

“What we’re seeing here is the product of a whole set of other social forces that are playing out in, at times, really lethal and disserving ways in some communities up and down the country. There’s a reason why this is a problem in Tottenham, Wood Green, and it’s not a problem in Richmond and South Kensington,” Garside says.

“If you adopt a whole-population approach then everyone benefits, including those who are most at risk of being victims of knife violence.”


0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2018 11:48 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
https://i.imgur.com/b1L158Gl.jpg

NB: Not just London!
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2018 11:49 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
https://i.imgur.com/LNl385sl.jpg
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2018 11:50 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
https://i.imgur.com/TXTYxqQl.jpg
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 05:20 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Throwing money at a problem never solves it.
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/02/2024 at 08:41:20