0
   

What I've heard about Iraq

 
 
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 11:55 am
Long. Saddeningly long.

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n03/wein01_.html

Quote:
What I Heard about Iraq
Eliot Weinberger


Confused

The truth doesn't mean sh*t anymore.

Cycloptichorn
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 3,308 • Replies: 63
No top replies

 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 12:26 pm
I heard Jack Hensley and Eugene Armstrong cry for help.
I heard Nicholas Berg cry for help.
I heard Margaret Hassan cry for help
I heard Kenneth Bigley cry for help.
I heard Enzo Baldoni cry for help
I heard Ivailo Kepov, Georgy Lazov, Fabrizio Quattrocchi, Hussein Olayyan, Zoran Nasovski and Dalibor Lazarevski, Sajid Naeem, Azad Hussein Khan, Kim Sun-Il, Durmus Kumdereli and Murat Yuce all cry for help before they were tortured and executed by those some like to call "freedom fighters".

It's interesting how some people can view the world in completely different ways.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 12:29 pm
None of those people would have been tortured or killed if we hadn't invaded Iraq. Your response is tangential to the topic at best.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 12:33 pm
Bookmark
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 01:10 pm
I heard 10,000,000 Iraquis choose the ballot over the bomb. The US over the insurgents. Perhaps freedom is messy...or perhaps I'm wrong.
Oh, and don't forget the millions of young Iraqui men between the ages of 16 and 26...they shall never be heard.



The United Nations did most of the work on Iraq's electoral procedures, and the election is being supervised by the Independent Electoral Commission, an Iraqi group assisted by a United Nations official. Who is eligible to vote?

All Iraqis 18 years or older are eligible, provided they can prove their citizenship. Iraq has no official census, so voters were registered through ration cards used for the UN oil-for-food program, which began in 1996. Iraqis whose ration-card information was correct were considered registered.

Iraq has a population of more than 25 million people, but 40 percent of them are under the age of 14 (in the United States, 20 percent of the population is 14 or younger). This young population leaves just 15.5 million Iraqis eligible - and 1.2 million of them live outside the country.


edited for clarification
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 01:17 pm
Nicely said, Pan.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 01:22 pm
Hey pan, just curious, if Iraqi's were registered according to their ration cards, how were the expats registered? Many expats who voted have been out of the country since before the first gulf war.

Edit: Just want to clarify that it is only curiosity that makes me ask that question. I just noticed, upon re-reading your post that you were illustrating how much more difficult it would have been to have the elections without the UN.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 01:26 pm
I read that the expats were registered in their respective countries...gimme a moment to find that site.
My take is that expats were easy to register...it was the Iraquis at home that were hard to account for since Saddam had never instituted a census.
(Too messy to actually account for the missing, you know?)
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 01:30 pm
None of this side discussion over how people were registered changes the vast body of lies, deceptions, intentional mistruths, and plain bad judgements that led to and make up the body of the Iraq war.

It is commendable and admirable that so many Iraqis faced possible violence to vote. At no point does this excuse the actions which have lead to this point; the ends (which, by the way, we aren't even close to) most certainly do not justify the means.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 01:30 pm
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:eZ_jH9GDdw0J:www.dos.state.pa.us/dos/lib/dos/20/faq_iraq_elections.pdf+Iraqui+voter+registration&hl=en&client=firefox-a


http://www.iraqocv.org/php/index.php?lang=eng


hope the first one works...it's PDF translated to html
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 01:35 pm
That makes sense, thanks for the link.

Sorry for the distraction, Cy, it was just something I wondered about. I agree that the end (to the extent that there is one) does not justify the means.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 01:39 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
the vast body of lies, deceptions, intentional mistruths, and plain bad judgements that led to and make up the body of the Iraq war.


At first I thought you were describing Saddam's transgressions...
And it's two wars...not one...no ..three. I forgot the Iraq-Iran war. I don't know Cyclo...there's just too big a mountain of Hussein's bodies stacked up.
You are our nation's conscience Cyclo. I was brought up with the same beliefs. I respect your morals immensely...it's just that I can't ride this train to the end of the track...I gotta get off at the next station.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 02:05 pm
Lest we forget, the U.S. helped Saddam with those piles of bodies regarding the Iraq-Iran war. Funny how we'll look the other way when it benefits us, but then pay attention when the oil starts to dry up.

Actually, it isn't funny whatsoever.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 02:35 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Lest we forget, the U.S. helped Saddam with those piles of bodies regarding the Iraq-Iran war. Funny how we'll look the other way when it benefits us, but then pay attention when the oil starts to dry up.

Actually, it isn't funny whatsoever.


And your point being ....... ?

You think we looked the other way when it benefitted us, but are paying attention now. Which is your point, that we should not pay attention now, or that we should've paid attention then?
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 03:05 pm
We should have paid attention then.

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 03:17 pm
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5e/Khomeini.jpg

Do you know who this man is? Do you know what he was trying to do?

Reagan responded to the situation as he and his administration saw fit at the time. Was it the best thing to do? Who can say. We only have one timeline from which to judge.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 03:24 pm
Dookie, you might find this hard to believe...but for fairness sake I included Iraq Iran...I don't believe there's anything black and white about complicity and our transgressions in the last 20 years.
But I crunched the numbers and I can live with the results...if Iraq stabilizes and becomes self-sufficient...WITHOUT our presence there.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 03:36 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
None of this side discussion over how people were registered changes the vast body of lies, deceptions, intentional mistruths, and plain bad judgements that led to and make up the body of the Iraq war.

It is commendable and admirable that so many Iraqis faced possible violence to vote. At no point does this excuse the actions which have lead to this point; the ends (which, by the way, we aren't even close to) most certainly do not justify the means.

Cycloptichorn

The same litany of bad logic as always.

1. The invasion was necessary because it was necessary to be very sure that Iraq had destroyed its WMD after years of lies and deception on Hussein's part and his inexplicable inability to provide hard evidence that the weapons had been destroyed and the programs dismantled (if indeed they were). Had he still had these things, millions could have died down the road.
2. I am unaware of any intentional mistruths on the part of the administration, although I hear you liberals repeat this concept over and over again like some kind of prayer.
3. We did not invade primarily to rescue the Iraqis from their hideous opression, but it is certainly an important goal. You seem perfectly happy with the idea of them having remained playthings of Hussein et al.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 04:11 pm
1. The invasion was not necessary. Did you even read the links?

2. I repeat: did you even read the links?

3. Then let's invade North Korea, Cuba, China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Sudan immediately. Or at least divest ourselves completely from these oppressive governments.

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

America will never learn. And besides, we need the oil.
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 04:14 pm
God, do I get sick of hearing about oil, Hitler and seeing that stupid picture.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What I've heard about Iraq
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/14/2024 at 01:24:27