plainoldme wrote:real life wrote:
Given the choice, I'd rather have schools that produce students that can read and comprehend, score well in algebra and know their history, rather than play ball and play the lead in Bye Bye Birdie.
If a school isn't producing the basics well, the fluff has to go. Let parents who see the value ( we paid for our kids music and sports out of our own pockets, and did it on our time not school time ) do it on their own dime.
Whoppee! You paid for your kids to do music and sports. Well, have some empathy, sport, because there are kids who come to school insufficiently fed because their parents are doing all they can do to keep a roof over their heads and the money doesn't extend beyond a small bowl of cereal for breakfast.
Have some understanding, if you can, that one mode of learning compliments and strengthens another. Those same parents who scream fluff about gym class and/or recess are the people who spend every weekend glued to telecast sports. Where do baseball/football/basketball players come from without school sports and fitness programs? Furthermore, physical exercise actually improves academic performance. When I subbed at the elementary school level, I had a very bright fifth grade class whose day began with two consecutive periods (periods are 45 minutes long at that level in that school) of writing. It is difficult for adults to write for 90 minutes, let alone ten year olds! I could see how exhausted these kids were and declared recess. That teacher, like many in that school, had a laundry basket filled with soccer balls, whiffle bats and balls, and jump ropes. The kids went out for 20 minutes, ran, played and climbed. They came back to their work with renewed energy.
Frankly, many of the contributors to these threads exhibit no ability to ascertain whether a school is doing well in the basics. Far too many contributors are guilty of poor logic, word usage and sentence construction.
I've got a lot more empathy for kids than you exhibit.
I think kids should be guided in their aspirations to be doctors, engineers, inventors, writers, historians .........
........not NBA players, NFL players or MLB players.
Do the math.
How many slots are open in the country for major league sports players? Maybe a few thousand at best. They have careers that average 2-3 years in the sport and they are out.
How many opportunities are there for kids who can read, write, know their math, their history, achieve in science? Millions of opportunities.
You do a great disservice to kids if you are encouraging them to consider pro sports as a profession, POM.
Teach them to read. Spend school money on teaching something that will benefit them.
If they want to play sports, perform music or act then let them do it after school.
Try this with a kid: Ask him, 'Tell me about the University of Florida (or any big university) ' and see if the first thing 8 out of 10 (or more ) mention is the sports program.
We give students the wrong perspective on education, POM. The University is not there just to field a football and basketball team.
Why can't a kid's heroes be those who are bright, creative, and educated? Because we steer them the wrong way. 'School spirit' is all about supporting the Homecoming Game, not the Science Fair.
Teachers and admins kowtow to athletes and send the message that kids who study hard are window dressing because what really excites us is going to State Championships in (name the sport).
btw I did not advocate ending recess or PE, so maybe you can brush up on your reading comprehension before you blast off next time.