No on Gonzales

Reply Tue 25 Jan, 2005 04:56 pm
To be clear: His tortured legalese which ultimately resulted in the atrocities at Abu Ghraib ought to be reason enough for the Senate to reject the nomination of Alberto Gonzales as Attorney General.

But now comes word that he pulled strings for then-Governor Bush at a voir dire for a DUI trial involving an Austin stripper so that Dubya could avoid disclosing his own DUI conviction -- and has subsequently prevaricated about it, under oath, before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

I am reminded of attorney Tom Hagen's line in the opening scene of "The Godfather", where he explained to the movie mogul: "I have a very special practice. I represent one client."

Throughout his career as consigliere to Bush, the task of Al Gonzales -- indeed his mission -- has been to find, or absent that, invent the justification for whatever it is that needed doing. Questionable or not, shady or not, legal or not. You can almost hear Bush saying "Git it done, Al," spoken with his trademark smirk, through the years.

Can't have the Guvna answer no questions about drinkin' and drivin'? Call in a chit wit' the judge. Got a death row inmate that needs killin'? Gloss over the fact that the condemned man's lawyer fell asleep during his trial. Need to make some camel jockeys -- errr, terrists -- spill their guts? Hell, that Geneva Convention's not only sixty years old, it's for pussies.

Conservatives get apoplectic when the Bush administration is called thugs, gangsters, or God forbid, a multinational corporation. When they do, all we should do is open a page from any one of the law books in Alberto Gonzales' library. They all say the same thing.

"Git it done, Al."

To vote to confirm this man as attorney general goes against seemingly every concept of freedom, liberty, and democracy mouthed by the President last Thursday and espoused in the Constitution. Not that that sort of thing matters much.

The Senate should reject this nominee.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 634 • Replies: 5
No top replies

Reply Tue 25 Jan, 2005 05:34 pm
He supports extension of the assault weapons ban, so in this case I have to agree with you. Just not for the reasons you mentioned.
0 Replies
Reply Tue 25 Jan, 2005 05:36 pm
not so fast PDid, we all know Gonzales is latino and all repub latinos are above reproach, tis only the midguided (and misled) lib latinos that are evil. Castro is a lib (demunnist) and that there Ceasar Chavez was a labour organizer (pinko in my book) So when you run amok against Gonzales you are a narrow minded anti-latino.
0 Replies
Reply Tue 25 Jan, 2005 05:41 pm
I think cj's post is telling.

If the NRA were to come out against Gonzales, he'd be deader than John Brown's body.

What's the gun lobby saying about him, cj?
0 Replies
Reply Tue 25 Jan, 2005 05:45 pm
He needs retraining.
0 Replies
Reply Tue 25 Jan, 2005 06:36 pm
How do they accomplish that sort of thing?

I mean, do they do it with a gun? Electric wires attached to sensitive body parts? Threats? Harsh language?
0 Replies

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
  1. Forums
  2. » No on Gonzales
Copyright © 2023 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/06/2023 at 08:24:48