61
   

THE MEANING OF OZ - All you need to know!

 
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 04:14 pm
McTag wrote:
Hey what's this about Ozzie cricketers complaining about sledging?

Did they get upset? Awwwww, the diddums.

Rolling Eyes

I thought Ozzie cricketers invented it?


Huge controversy here!

Perhaps even Olga has heard of it.

Sack Australian captain Ricky Ponting! Sack Hayden and Gilchrist. Michael Clarke should never be captain. Shoot the bloody lot of them.

Send the racist Indians home.

Kill the referees. Impeach Steve Bucknor.

Stuff the International Cricket Council.

It's the front page of the Sydney Morning Herald, as well as the front of the sports section, attracted a quite biting editorial, and a squillion letters. The morning tv programmes are full of it.

Obviously a quiet news period.

Suspect the whole thing has raced out of control. I can't see any sort of peaceful resolution at this point.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 04:56 pm
It is weird. It's seems to have snowballed exponentially.

It was weird that Ponting made an official complaint, but it wasn't the verbal abuse, it was the perceived racism.

Snippets of the story so far.

ICC introduces more explicit racial vilification laws (in response mainly to crowd behaviour in many countries, including Australia).

Andrew Symonds on tour in India is subjected to 'racial' abuse by crowds in Mumbai (Chants of 'monkey' - for those who don't know Symonds is a dreadlocked English born Australian of West Indian descent - and a bloody good cricketer).

At some point on that Indian tour Harbajahn Singh called Symonds a monkey too. An unofficial agreement between the captains saw that the matter was taken no further on the proviso that it 'would never happen again'.

Shoot forward to Sydney test, Symonds has played a key role in saving the Australian first innings after not being given out on what seemed a clear dismissal.

During the Indian first innings Singh is batting, takes a run, and, according to Symonds, touches/taps/pats/hits Brett Lee (the bowler) on the butt with his bat. Symonds says to Singh something along the lines of 'That's not on, pull your head in (expletives possibly deleted)'. Singh calls Symonds a monkey. Captain Ponting reports it to umpires, umpires report it to match referee, hearing called for after the test, Singh suspended for 3 tests. India appeal (threatening to call off their Australian tour).


Cricket commentators are all over the place on this one:

Seeing Harsha Bogle explain that 'monkey' is not a racist term in India, but rather one of bemused affection (as in 'you cheeky little monkey') made me squirm given the context the term had in Mumbai.

Greig being unable to see the distinction (or importance of the distinction) between verbal abuse and verbal racial abuse was unsurprising given his birthright.

Gideon Haigh having a go at the Australians for their celebrations in winning the test was amazing (even I jumped up on my feet such was the unexpected victory).

Taylor made the point that in effect Ponting had opened Pandora's box because his team is arguably the most abusive and could face a welter of countercharges (but I'd argue that he too has missed the distinction, in ICC rules, between abuse and racial abuse).

I wonder what was going through Singh's mind? I wonder now whether Indian team management has succumbed to a feeling of 'everything's rigged/everyone's against us, don't you realise we are not a colony any more, we are an economic powerhouse destined to overtake china, we will not turn the cheek any more, and in any case - we will run cricket from now on (read up on the 20-20 superleague)'. It seems petulant. It also seems reminiscent of the debacle between Pakistan and England and Daryl Hair last season.

Some of the actions post match are weird. How would Indian fans have reacted if Oz journalists had accused Kumble of cheating? Australian journalists are shredding the Australians for boisterous appealing on the last afternoon ignoring that 24 hours before the Indians were appealing on every ball, because they were desparate to win too.

It's hard to see how we got here and its hard to see how we back out.

On field I thought there was a camaraderie between the players, and the Indians especially made the point of congratulating Australians at the end of innings, or sessions.

I like Ishant Sharma. Poor bugger, what a debut test.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 05:05 pm
<Gotta be quick. On the run. Heading off to the country today.)

... but I've gotta say, as a non-cricket enthusiast with little knowledge of recent goings on, it seems pretty strange that someone should be penalized in such a way for calling someone else a "monkey". (Is that actually racist? Confused ) And that just about everyone in Oz & India is so highly excited & outraged about it all! Wow! Amazing! And I thought it was a boring game! Surprised
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 08:12 pm
Just goes to show, Olga

Ain't boring no more.

It was a good game, with a couple of unsavoury incidents.

It's the Indians burning effigies stuff that gets to me. That's just absurd.

Sheeesh! you people. It's a game!
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 09:11 pm
Yeah, but Margo, it wasn't like a huge crowd flooding the streets, I counted maybe 15 guys - I'm sure we could round up 15 guys from a pub to burn an effigy of just about anything.

I guess when your population cracks a billion you have a sizable group of every type of nutter (even though the proportions are the same).

You know how we've go that one serial pest (name?)? well, by my calculations they must have 300.

I did see an Indian commentator early in the series say that, by rights, the two top teams in the world should both be Indian (based on number of players).
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 09:58 pm
The Age weighs in:

If petulance has no place at junior level, it has no place at all in Tests
0 Replies
 
Tigershark
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 10:22 pm
Here's a good old fashioned sledging match from a few years back. These new guys don't know the meaning of the term


Mark Waugh & Adam Parore: Waugh standing at second slip, the new player (Parore) comes to the crease playing & missing the first ball. Mark: "Oh, I remember you from a couple years ago in Australia. You were sh*t then, you're f***ing useless now." Parore (turning around): "Yeah, that's me. And when I was there you were going out with that old, ugly slut. And now I hear you've married her, you dumb f***!". Laughing
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 11:42 pm
What about Glen McGrath and Sarwan. Or Lehman and the Black Cats...
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 11:50 pm
Still nothing from dadpad - and he hasn't picked up my pm.

The aliens must have got him!
0 Replies
 
Dutchy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 11:52 pm
margo wrote:
Still nothing from dadpad - and he hasn't picked up my pm.

The aliens must have got him!

I was afraid of that. Smile
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 04:21 pm
Dutchy wrote:
margo wrote:
Still nothing from dadpad - and he hasn't picked up my pm.

The aliens must have got him!

I was afraid of that. Smile


Last post 12.15am Monday morning.

And then the lights came!
Shocked
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 06:22 pm
margo wrote:
Huge controversy here!

Perhaps even Olga has heard of it.


No need to attack the ignorant! Fair go! Evil or Very Mad

But honestly, margo, how could I possibly miss this? There is absolutely nothing else in my paper today!

You tragics (in both countries) sure do take this game seriously!

It'd be good if someone could explain just why to those of us who are mystified. :wink:
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 10:35 pm
msolga wrote:



But honestly, margo, how could I possibly miss this? There is absolutely nothing else in my paper today!



Nothing else! But Nicole Kidman's pregnant!

Surely there's that!
0 Replies
 
Dutchy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jan, 2008 11:34 pm
margo wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
margo wrote:
Still nothing from dadpad - and he hasn't picked up my pm.

The aliens must have got him!

I was afraid of that. Smile


Last post 12.15am Monday morning.

And then the lights came!
Shocked

Did you see his last post? Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:45 pm Subject: Going Nuclear!
Enough reason to be an alien target. Smile
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 01:27 am
margo wrote:
msolga wrote:



But honestly, margo, how could I possibly miss this? There is absolutely nothing else in my paper today!



Nothing else! But Nicole Kidman's pregnant!

Surely there's that!



True. And that is really, really exciting!

I can't begin to tell you how thrilled I am about that!
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 01:31 am
I thought Nic and Tom adopted because they couldn't have children - now they both have biological kiddies. I have to go a doctor or dentist's surgery and read some old magazines.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 01:42 am
hingehead wrote:
I thought Nic and Tom adopted because they couldn't have children - now they both have biological kiddies. I have to go a doctor or dentist's surgery and read some old magazines.


It is a far more sinister story than that, hinge! Your understanding is merely the tip of the iceberg! (I've spend time in doctor's waiting rooms, too. Obviously I wait much longer than you do! Laughing )

Our Nic went through hell & back with Tom & his .. er ... "religious convictions"!

Thank the goddess she's now found a good Aussie fella to settle down with!

That girl deserves our sympathy & admiration!

(I can't explain the "biological kiddies", either, hard as I try to understand!)
0 Replies
 
Tigershark
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 02:00 am
What importance is Nicole Kidman's reproductive state to any of you people? I mean, REALLY?
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 02:09 am
Tigershark wrote:
What importance is Nicole Kidman's reproductive state to any of you people? I mean, REALLY?


Ah, Tigershark, you really think we are absolutely, earnestly serious in this discussion? I hate having to spell things out, but we're just having a wee bit of fun.
0 Replies
 
Tigershark
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jan, 2008 02:18 am
msolga wrote:
Tigershark wrote:
What importance is Nicole Kidman's reproductive state to any of you people? I mean, REALLY?


Ah, Tigershark, you really think we are absolutely, earnestly serious in this discussion? I hate having to spell things out, but we're just having a wee bit of fun.


I know. Me too Drunk
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Beached As Bro - Discussion by dadpad
Oz election thread #3 - Rudd's Labour - Discussion by msolga
Australian music - Discussion by Wilso
Oz Election Thread #6 - Abbott's LNP - Discussion by hingehead
AUstralian Philosophers - Discussion by dadpad
Australia voting system - Discussion by fbaezer
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 02/28/2025 at 11:43:04