Iran, the Hejaz railway and the 'ultimate deal'

Reply Sun 24 Dec, 2017 07:19 am
An ambitious Israeli cabinet minister, a thrusting Saudi crown prince, a son-in-law of a US president and a long-abandoned railway. Could this be the start of an anti-Iran axis that in a further twist of an extraordinary tale pulls a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians like a rabbit out of a hat?
The cabinet minister is Yisrael Katz who holds both the portfolios of intelligence affairs and transport in the current Israeli government. He is considered to be a leading candidate to take Benjamin Netanyahu's job should swirling corruption charges finally bring down Israel's second-longest-serving prime minister.
The crown prince is, of course, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) who now exercises a panoply of powers unseen since the days of his grandfather Ibn Saud, the founder of the modern-day Saudi kingdom. MBS is as ruthless as he is ambitious, having despatched his rivals to the throne in short order.
The son-in-law is Jared Kushner, a New York real estate developer who was anointed a senior adviser to the president and charged with securing an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal.
Don't fall for Netanyahu's dangerous distraction

by Halim Shebaya
The railway is the 1,300km track the Ottomans built in 1908 between Damascus and Medina, Islam's second-holiest site. A branch line connected the Mediterranean port of Haifa to the main line via the Jezreel Valley and modern-day Jordan. The railway closed in 1920 as the Ottoman Empire collapsed.
Now Minister Katz is pushing a freight railway revival as a key element in an anti-Iran axis, one that would use trade to pull Saudi Arabia and other Arab states into a close alliance with Israel. In a recent interview with the Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail, he stated that "Iran is the big enemy," adding "It's very clear we [Israel and Saudi Arabia] are practically on the same side … All Sunni countries are against Iran. We wish to have a peace agreement in parallel with advancing regional economic development initiatives."
The minister, a member of Netanyahu's Likud party has already overseen the opening of 60 kilometres of track from Haifa, through the Jezreel Valley in northeast Israel to the border of Jordan. And though he is a fervent opponent of the two-state solution, he has offered Palestinians living in the West Bank an intriguing carrot: a spur line that would connect the Palestinian city of Jenin to the main railway. "If the Palestinians connect to a railway system, the entire area will get a significant economic boost," he told Haaretz newspaper.
Meanwhile, he has been busy wooing MBS. On December 14, he openly courted MBS with an offer to hit "Iranian missile plants" in Lebanon. The Saudis, though they won't say so openly, have been badly rattled by two missile attacks on Riyadh. They accuse Iran of supplying the long-range missiles, fired by Houthi rebels inside Yemen, through their regional proxy Hezbollah. It is a charge the Iranians deny.
Katz called the 32-year-old Saudi Crown Prince a leader of the Arab world and proposed that Saudi Arabia sponsor a new Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The minister added that Israel would be happy to participate in such negotiations. And he invited MBS to visit Israel to meet senior Israeli government officials and Katz himself. Such a meeting presumably would take place in Jerusalem where the Israeli parliament, the Knesset and government ministries are located.
That may be a step too far, at least at this stage. Still the official Saudi response to US President Donald Trump's statement declaring Jerusalem the capital of Israel has been surprisingly muted given that the kingdom's leadership over several decades has pushed, often only tepidly, for a two-state solution with East Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital.
Just how muted can be measured by a remarkable meeting MBS had in early December with Robert Satloff who runs the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. The WINEP is a pro-Israeli think-tank linked to AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), itself a powerful organisation that lobbies strenuously on Israel's behalf in Washington.
Sadat to Salman: Israel at the expense of Palestine

by Marwan Bishara
Satloff had an 80-minute session with MBS in Riyadh, something that would have been unthinkable even a few months ago. The fact that the meeting happened just after Trump's declaration on Jerusalem, that it lasted over an hour, and that MBS only mentioned Jerusalem after prompting from Satloff, makes it even more remarkable.
A week later Satloff published an article on WINEP's website titled "Mohammed bin Salman Doesn't Want to Talk About Jerusalem". He wrote the following:
"If we hadn't asked him directly about Trump's announcement, it may never have come up […] He limited himself to a single word of disappointment about the President's decision - literally - and then quickly turned to where Riyadh and Washington could work together to limit the fallout and restore hope to the Israeli-Palestinian peace process."
That peace process increasingly looks to be a deal cooked up by MBS and Jared Kushner. It is the so-called sanctuary plan which would see a new Palestinian state created by combining Gaza with North Sinai. West Bank Palestinian towns and cities now being increasingly encircled by Israeli settlements would fall under the jurisdiction of Jordan. For their part, the Saudis would commit hundreds of millions of dollars to support the project.
The plan anticipates an exodus of Palestinians to Sinai from the West Bank, from a terribly overcrowded Gaza and from Israel thus defusing the demographic time bomb the Israelis would face if they declared a one-state solution with equal rights for all, a democracy where Palestinians would inevitably become the majority.
Declaring Jerusalem the capital of Israel is the first step in the grand plan to close, in Trump's words, "the ultimate deal". Katz with his transport minister's cap on has already offered to build an artificial island off the coast of Gaza that would serve as an airport and transport hub for the new state.
That the sanctuary plan flies in the face of reality on the ground seems to have escaped Katz, MBS and Kushner. The Palestinians are not likely to be gang-pressed into abandoning their decades-long struggle for their homeland. Nor are Egyptians living in North Sinai going to take well being forcibly relocated west of Suez. And will President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, already stung by criticism for giving up two islands to the Saudis, offer up a big chunk of the Sinai Peninsula? Finally, where will the increasingly cash-strapped Saudis find the money to fund this madcap enterprise?
For now, though, the real danger remains the heightened anxiety over the growing clout of Iran in the region, one that could lead the Israelis, the Saudis and the Americans into a full-scale proxy war. And Katz has already signalled that he is up for it. Speaking recently of the 2006 Hezbollah-Israeli war in Lebanon, he said, "What happened in 2006 will be a picnic compared to what we can do […] I am telling you that we will return Lebanon to the Stone Age."
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,939 • Replies: 5
No top replies

Reply Sun 24 Dec, 2017 09:53 am
As fosil fuels become further obsolete , Ive seen an engineering plan of a fully solar RR where a"Third rail" concept is used as a power provider the entire length. The solar panels and inverters would be located all along the track and the track and power unit would be one. The train would include several sequential drive motors that kick in at departure and can go in and out of use as the train speeds up or rises grades.
I see the Saudis looking byond oil coal and nuke. Since the solar budget is approximately 10000 tims more energy dense than is used in the entire world
0 Replies
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2017 04:34 am
It appears that the plan meets with the approval of some of the Israelis:
0 Replies
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2017 09:27 am
What do Palestinians think about the possible exodus and the "carrot"?

I am wondering what is behind Trump's sudden scolding of Saudi Arabia concerning Yemen?

Why Trump lashed out at Saudi Arabia about its role in Yemen’s war (WP)

President Trump's public rebuke of Saudi Arabia this month for its role in the conflict in Yemen was an impromptu move quickly set in motion after intelligence officials presented him with images of the deepening humanitarian crisis there, officials said.

In a strongly worded statement that surprised foreign diplomats and even key figures in his administration, Trump called on Saudi Arabia to allow food and supplies to reach "the Yemeni people who desperately need it."
"This must be done for humanitarian reasons immediately," he said.

The Dec. 6 statement marked a striking departure for a president who has shown unflinching support for the kingdom's leadership. Administration officials say it was instrumental in Saudi Arabia's decision to temporarily suspend its blockade of the Red Sea port of Hodeida, though critics question how much the move will ease the suffering in Yemen's nearly three-year-old war.

Our support of Saudi Arabia against Yemen is probably causing more deserved hatred against us. I don't get why we have to interfere with the whole ME and we always seem to be on the aggressors side causing more suffering for all the ordinary people of the ME. I think we should drastically pull out of every ME country we are in and take care of our business and quit supporting wars which cause more suffering.
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2017 09:48 am
I agree with that.
0 Replies
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2017 02:31 pm
revelette1 wrote:
What do Palestinians think about the possible exodus and the "carrot"?

Palestinians always object to peace. All they care about is murdering children.

revelette1 wrote:
Our support of Saudi Arabia against Yemen is probably causing more deserved hatred against us.

Our defense of ourselves and our support for our allies' defense of themselves hardly makes us deserving of hatred.

revelette1 wrote:
I don't get why we have to interfere with the whole ME

Because we live in the real world where actions in the Middle East have a strong impact on us. If we allowed some dictator to conquer all of the world's oil supply, we'd be paying $100 a gallon at the gas pumps. If we allowed some dictator to blockade international shipping, the global economy would grind to a halt. And if we allowed nutcases to conquer the world and commit genocide against everyone, well, we'd all be slaughtered.

revelette1 wrote:
we always seem to be on the aggressors side causing more suffering for all the ordinary people of the ME.

No we don't.

revelette1 wrote:
I think we should drastically pull out of every ME country we are in

So we can end up paying $100 per gallon at the gas pump (until we are finally massacred)?

No thank you.

revelette1 wrote:
and take care of our business

Preventing dictators from seizing oil supplies, preventing dictators from shutting down international trade, and preventing genocidal nutcases from massacring us is very much our business.

revelette1 wrote:
and quit supporting wars which cause more suffering.

Maybe we should quit having police officers protect us from criminals too while we're at it.
0 Replies

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
  1. Forums
  2. » Iran, the Hejaz railway and the 'ultimate deal'
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 02/28/2024 at 03:19:03