0
   

War Created Haven, CIA Advisers Report

 
 
ehBeth
 
Reply Sat 15 Jan, 2005 03:23 pm
This is from a subscription (free, but I know a lot of people don't like to subscribe, and others don't want to follow 'blind' links)

Quote:
Iraq New Terror Breeding Ground
War Created Haven, CIA Advisers Report

By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 14, 2005; Page A01

Iraq has replaced Afghanistan as the training ground for the next generation of "professionalized" terrorists, according to a report released yesterday by the National Intelligence Council, the CIA director's think tank.


Iraq provides terrorists with "a training ground, a recruitment ground, the opportunity for enhancing technical skills," said David B. Low, the national intelligence officer for transnational threats. "There is even, under the best scenario, over time, the likelihood that some of the jihadists who are not killed there will, in a sense, go home, wherever home is, and will therefore disperse to various other countries."


Low's comments came during a rare briefing by the council on its new report on long-term global trends. It took a year to produce and includes the analysis of 1,000 U.S. and foreign experts. Within the 119-page report is an evaluation of Iraq's new role as a breeding ground for Islamic terrorists.



President Bush has frequently described the Iraq war as an integral part of U.S. efforts to combat terrorism. But the council's report suggests the conflict has also helped terrorists by creating a haven for them in the chaos of war.

"At the moment," NIC Chairman Robert L. Hutchings said, Iraq "is a magnet for international terrorist activity."


Before the U.S. invasion, the CIA said Saddam Hussein had only circumstantial ties with several al Qaeda members. Osama bin Laden rejected the idea of forming an alliance with Hussein and viewed him as an enemy of the jihadist movement because the Iraqi leader rejected radical Islamic ideals and ran a secular government.


Bush described the war in Iraq as a means to promote democracy in the Middle East. "A free Iraq can be a source of hope for all the Middle East," he said one month before the invasion. "Instead of threatening its neighbors and harboring terrorists, Iraq can be an example of progress and prosperity in a region that needs both."


But as instability in Iraq grew after the toppling of Hussein, and resentment toward the United States intensified in the Muslim world, hundreds of foreign terrorists flooded into Iraq across its unguarded borders. They found tons of unprotected weapons caches that, military officials say, they are now using against U.S. troops. Foreign terrorists are believed to make up a large portion of today's suicide bombers, and U.S. intelligence officials say these foreigners are forming tactical, ever-changing alliances with former Baathist fighters and other insurgents.


"The al-Qa'ida membership that was distinguished by having trained in Afghanistan will gradually dissipate, to be replaced in part by the dispersion of the experienced survivors of the conflict in Iraq," the report says.


According to the NIC report, Iraq has joined the list of conflicts -- including the Israeli-Palestinian stalemate, and independence movements in Chechnya, Kashmir, Mindanao in the Philippines, and southern Thailand -- that have deepened solidarity among Muslims and helped spread radical Islamic ideology.


At the same time, the report says that by 2020, al Qaeda "will be superseded" by other Islamic extremist groups that will merge with local separatist movements. Most terrorism experts say this is already well underway. The NIC says this kind of ever-morphing decentralized movement is much more difficult to uncover and defeat.


Terrorists are able to easily communicate, train and recruit through the Internet, and their threat will become "an eclectic array of groups, cells and individuals that do not need a stationary headquarters," the council's report says. "Training materials, targeting guidance, weapons know-how, and fund-raising will become virtual (i.e. online)."


The report, titled "Mapping the Global Future," highlights the effects of globalization and other economic and social trends. But NIC officials said their greatest concern remains the possibility that terrorists may acquire biological weapons and, although less likely, a nuclear device.


The council is tasked with midterm and strategic analysis, and advises the CIA director. "The NIC's goal," one NIC publication states, "is to provide policymakers with the best, unvarnished, and unbiased information -- regardless of whether analytic judgments conform to U.S. policy."


Other than reports and studies, the council produces classified National Intelligence Estimates, which represent the consensus among U.S. intelligence agencies on specific issues.

Yesterday, Hutchings, former assistant dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University, said the NIC report tried to avoid analyzing the effect of U.S. policy on global trends to avoid being drawn into partisan politics.

Among the report's major findings is that the likelihood of "great power conflict escalating into total war . . . is lower than at any time in the past century." However, "at no time since the formation of the Western alliance system in 1949 have the shape and nature of international alignments been in such a state of flux as they have in the past decade."


The report also says the emergence of China and India as new global economic powerhouses "will be the most challenging of all" Washington's regional relationships. It also says that in the competition with Asia over technological advances, the United States "may lose its edge" in some sectors.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7460-2005Jan13.html
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 732 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Steppenwolf
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Jan, 2005 03:50 pm
Woohoo! I get another first crack at ehBeth's polls!

The saddest thing about this whole ordeal is that many of these problems were noted before the war. See http://www.freep.com/news/nw/iraq12_20030712.htm (providing an incomplete list of State and CIA memos that were discarded in favor of the DoD's now debunked optimism). The new, activist foreign policy promoted by Bush had significant cache among foreign policy aficionados prior to his bumbling in post-war Iraq. Many of the members of the largest pre-war reconstruction study -- the "Future of Iraq" group (a combined agency group headed by State) -- favored an active approach even as they cautioned against the DoD's misplaced optimism. As far as I can tell, the administration intentionally blinded themselves from their own foreign policy and intelligence agencies.

A more intellectually curious approach -- one that tolerated dissenting voices and considered base-level intelligence in addition to top-level ideology -- would not have necessarily concluded that this war was a 'bad' idea. I remain compelled by an active foreign policy (Iraq not being a good example of how such a policy works), but this administration's aversion to dialogue and debate have made the war ten times more difficult than it needed to be.

Why wasn't anyone listening? They're still not listening despite the clear fact that the dissenters were right about reconstruction. The same voices that expressed caution about the ease of reconstruction have left or been removed from State and CIA, while those that pushed the cakewalk story are still calling the shots at the DoD. It's frustrating for someone that hoped that the Bush administration could breath new life into American foreign policy.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Jan, 2005 03:56 pm
What I find disturbing, but not surprising, is these reports starting to appear. Seems bits of the results were leaking out before the election, but no one was putting their names on til after.
0 Replies
 
Steppenwolf
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Jan, 2005 04:00 pm
When some of these studies were carried out, the excitement about war eclipsed concerns about post-war. We wanted fireworks and military sport, not a cautionary tale about civil unrest. Moreover, self interest prevents whistleblowing. The people involved in these studies would have lost their jobs. Now that many have been forced out anyway (after Powell's departure and the CIA cleansing), they're starting to open up. Too little too late, I fear.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Jan, 2005 06:58 pm
"Iraq provides terrorists with "a training ground, a recruitment ground"

Wasn't anyone listening, indeed.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Jan, 2005 08:28 pm
Lol - what is sad is that, had the US administration bothered to listen to its own military, and Middle east experts, and history, this could have been predicted. (It WAS - they isolated or got rid of dissenting voices)

One need only go back as far as Russia's experience in Afghanistan - which is one of the things that helped heat up the whole damn Islamist movement in the first place - not to mention that the US policies of arming terrorists there helped the rise of forces like AlQuaeda.

Superpowers playing their stupid games of real-politik think they can control the forces they foster. This is almost always a tragic mistake.

I was reading about Aceh yesterday, apropos of another thread, and discovered the same mistakes there - the Dutch armed an Acinese leader - who was in opposition to the people they were fighting in attempting to take over Aceh - he took their money for two years - then attacked them with his fine new army.

Beth - I posted that article on the Iraq and the US and UN thread yesterday - I agree that it is interesting that this stuff is coming out.

At least the US still has the basic democratic institutions that mean this stuff DOES come out - I admire that. Oz governments tend to be able to keep more secrets.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » War Created Haven, CIA Advisers Report
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 06:36:18