Phoenix32890 wrote:Great job bi!
great job all around...4 bands, the venue, the people who came out to support..the people who donated prizes...all I did was call in favors, make a big noise about it and show my ass to get peoples attention...we all have our talents......
dlowan wrote:Very reasonable on the surface Piffka.
BUT
what we have to realise is that the invasion of Iraq has left lots of Muslims really believing that the US (and Oz and the UK) are really out to destroy them
And why - given the debacle in Iraq - should they be shat upon for thinking this?
Shat upon? Because I question their motives? You haven't seen ****, if you think that stinks. I offered a very mild-mannered criticism of a country who wants help, needs help, yet doesn't want it if it comes from the West. Their top interests are to control the Aceh GAM and maintain face, not rebuild after the disaster. I think they see this disaster as a godsend in their fight against the people of Aceh. What a great way to put down a rebellion.
Indonesia has been paranoid and politicizing this disaster practically since it happened. For example, this news c/o London Times was from more than a week ago...
A hug and a bum pat for the bear!
Piffka wrote:dlowan wrote:Very reasonable on the surface Piffka.
BUT
what we have to realise is that the invasion of Iraq has left lots of Muslims really believing that the US (and Oz and the UK) are really out to destroy them
And why - given the debacle in Iraq - should they be shat upon for thinking this?
Shat upon? Because I question their motives? You haven't seen ****, if you think that stinks. I offered a very mild-mannered criticism of a country who wants help, needs help, yet doesn't want it if it comes from the West. Their top interests are to control the Aceh GAM and maintain face, not rebuild after the disaster. I think they see this disaster as a godsend in their fight against the people of Aceh. What a great way to put down a rebellion.
Indonesia has been paranoid and politicizing this disaster practically since it happened. For example, this news c/o London Times was from more than a week ago...
Wasn't actually speaking of your criticisms as shitting upon, Piffka - but of some of the other comments here - but I can see why you thought I was referring to yours.
I just think you are not really seeing things from the Indonsian government perspective, is all. Even the article you quote gives an historical context for "paranoia".
It is not that I do not see your perspective - I do. I just think it is a one-sided one.
roger wrote:You drunk, ehBeth?
back off rodent..... ebeth can pat my bum any damn time she wants.... as long as Set doesn't kick it :wink:
and it appears the 3 month deadline isn't a big issue to the talking heads from Washington
Quote:US Military Sees Its Tsunami Work Winding Down
Sat Jan 15, 2005 03:37 PM ET
BANDA ACEH, Indonesia (Reuters) - The U.S. military, a leading force behind relief efforts in tsunami-hit nations, said on Saturday it expected to end major work in Thailand and Sri Lanka within two weeks but to stay longer in Indonesia.
More shopping markets reopened, fishermen received new boats and even the sea was given a clean-up as people in the Indian Ocean region set about repairing the damage from the Dec. 26 tsunami and restoring normal life.
U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz flew over Indonesia's worst-hit Aceh province, where the tsunami killed about two-thirds of the total global death toll of more than 162,000, and told reporters he was shocked at the devastation.
"I thought I was prepared for it, and I honestly wasn't -- the enormous extent of it, the complete desolation," he said.
U.S. military commanders briefed Wolfowitz, saying Thailand and Sri Lanka would soon be able to cope on their own.
"We see ourselves in a position to make that transition in a week or two," Lieutenant General Robert Blackman told Wolfowitz at U-tapao Royal Thai Naval base south of Bangkok.
Officers said it would take slightly longer in Indonesia.
The United States has deployed some 15,000 servicemen, ships and helicopters to deliver emergency aid to tsunami-ravaged countries round the Indian Ocean, mostly to Aceh.
Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country, is sensitive about having a large multinational military presence in Aceh, an area riven by a separatist conflict, and wants U.S., Japanese, Australian and other forces to leave by April.
JAKARTA DEADLINE
Wolfowitz, U.S. ambassador to Indonesia in the late 1980s, said Washington had no problem with Jakarta setting a deadline because it was a goal to take over all aid work.
2 more pages follow from
Reuters link
Lol - this topic has had me reading up on Aceh.
What a place - they fought the Dutch pretty much to a standstill!!!!
Dealing with Indonesia is always a challenge for we unsubtle westerners, as Javanese ideas about how and what to communicate are so different. Here is an example - presumably Indonesia's government did not like the reaction to their expressed desire for foreign troops to leave by a certain date - so it never happened:
Jakarta denies foreign troop curb
The US military wants to pass on the relief effort to countries affected
Indonesia has denied saying that foreign troops involved in the tsunami relief operation must leave the country within three months of the disaster.
Defence Minister Juwono Sudarsono said 26 March was not a deadline for foreign military personnel, but a benchmark.
He said that by that date, Indonesian authorities aimed to be able to take over most of the relief effort.
The minister was speaking after talks on Sunday with visiting US Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz.
The day before, Mr Wolfowitz said the US wanted to pull its military out of Asian tsunami relief operations as soon as possible and hand over the task to regional governments.
The US has sent more than 15,000 military personnel to the region, at a time when commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan are already placing a heavy burden on the country's armed forces.
More than 168,000 people were killed in the disaster throughout the Indian Ocean region. In Indonesia, the death toll climbed to almost 115,000 on Sunday, after nearly 5,000 more bodies were found along the west coast of Aceh province.
Thousands homeless
"We would like to emphasise that 26 March is not a deadline for involvement of foreign military personnel in the relief effort," Mr Sudarsono said.
Jakarta's chance for change
"It is a benchmark for the Indonesian government to improve and accelerate its relief efforts, so that by 26 March, the large part of the burden of the relief effort will be carried by the Indonesian government and the Indonesian authorities on the ground."
Mr Sudarsono said he expected foreign troops to play a part in the operation for some time, albeit in a reduced role.
Hundreds of thousands of people in Indonesia are still homeless after the disaster, and the UN's refugee agency, the UNHCR, has begun airlifting supplies to remote parts of the country.
The agency is planning to bring in about 10,000 tents and other supplies, and to set up new sites to relieve the pressure on overcrowded camps.
The BBC's Tim Johnston in Jakarta says a US aircraft carrier off the coast of Sumatra island is providing much-needed helicopters to lift supplies into, and injured victims out of, parts of the disaster zone that are beyond the reach of more conventional transport.
Given the extent of the damage to roads, bridges and ports, tens of thousands of Acehnese victims are likely to need some sort of international assistance for a while yet, our correspondent says.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4178635.stm
I must say, think Wolfowitz has dealt with this very well for the US!!!!! And for tsunami victims.
Tempest in a teapot. Indonesia DOES have a bit of a civil war going on in that part of Sumatra. In such a situation their sensitivity is understandable. I also agree with the earlier comments about the former colonial past and the sensitivities that arose our of recent eve3nts in East Timur. ( However, one must recognize that the central issue there was Muslim intolerance.)
No problem removing our troops: I'm sure the Navy has better things to do with its battle group and the Marines would rather be home. I would, however resist using this as an excuse for doing more of this through the UN. If they don't want our help as it is, they shouldn't be given it in disguise. BiPolar is right.
Interesting article.
"As a result, the government is sensitive to growing criticism of the presence of foreigners from hardline Islamic fundamentalist groups. Aceh has the highest proportion of Muslims in Indonesia, and is one of the few Indonesian regions that has instituted Islamic law. "
The form of Islam in Aceh is unusually fundamentalist, for Indonesia. GAM have slaughtered many christian villages in this harsh, horrible war - also brutally fought by the Indonesian military. I have read that the majority of Achinese would, by now, rather get on with being part of Indonesia - weary of the brutal behaviour by both sides. Sigh.
Indonesia is one of those countries, artificially cobbled together from various rather disparate units, left in the wake of colonialism - like so many African countries.
I understand the - strongly Javanese-comprised - central government do not want their hard-fought-for country to fall apart - but the other groups often do not feel well-served - and feel that only colonialism has led to their being considered part of Indonesia at all.
The Indonesian government is endemically corrupt - and many non-Javanese feel that their area's resources go to Java, rather than remaining to build up their infrastructure and economy - this seems especially so in Aceh - which also has a strong independent history - and a military and militant tradition. The Balinese also, I believe, feel the same - in their gentle way - though they took up arms very fiercely when the Dutch came back expecting to pick up where they left off after WW II!
As for the Indonesian annexation of Irian Jaya and East Timor!!! It was about as justified, in my view, as China's "resumption" of Tibet.
The Thai thing is also interesting.
I think it sad - because many of their population live in great poverty. But I can understand their desire to be seen as strong and self-sufficient.
I wonder if similar pride would hinder, say, the US, or the UK, or Oz, from accepting help in such a disaster? Or - is it only countries which are emerging, as it were, which feel humiliated by accepting largesse?
I've thought about such a lot myself, without coming to result.
I think human nature is much the same everywhere. We all want the sympathy and reassuring support of others. However, actually acepting charity, even when you are in need, is a bit painful. The sight of the benefactor's agents can be as much an unpleasant reminder of one's plight as it is a welcome relief. I suspect we would react very much as have the unfortunate victims in East Asia.