squinney wrote:Yes, the aid is needed and we have to stay and help the people.
But, I must ask, if the US had a major catastrophe that wiped out a large section of the east coast, would we tell Russian ships they weren't welcome? Would we allow people from all over the world to come on shore without registration or any record of who they are just because they say they are here to help? Allow them to stay as long as they decided they needed to?
I think if we turned it around and looked at we might see where the Indonesian government is coming from.
Excellent point - one I got too tired to make.
I think allowing foreign military in is always a difficult thing for a nation which does not see the militaries in question as firm and trusted allies - and neither Oz nor the US are in that category for Indonesians.
With Aceh in insurgency, and the Oz military just pulling out of East Timor, this is especially so. (Oz and Indonesia actually fought each other in the sixties - when we supported the newly formed Federation of Malaysia against Indonesian "confrontation". Neither side has forgotten this - nor the Indonesian take-over of Irian Jaya - formerly West Papua. The Indonesians are still brutalising any Irian Jaya folk who are against their rule - which Indonesia sees as simply re-asserting its sovereignty.)
You see, Indonesia feels always under threat of disintegrating - think of the Turkish attitude to a separate Kurdish state for another example, and Papua Nugini's recent civil war - (a good historical example of countries reacting similarly to threats of splitting is your own Civil War) and they will fight hard to remain a single country. They see the East Timor thing as the west (especially Oz) trying to split their country.
I have absolutely no doubt that they have a great deal to hide in Aceh.
But I DO have an understanding of their attitude, which I think some here are being very obtuse about, and not, as Squinney has said, performing the simple act of thinking about the shoe being on the other foot.