0
   

Are the more literate less literal?

 
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:11 pm
Your partner is photographer and doesn't know what "aspect" means? Oiy!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:14 pm
fishin' wrote:
dlowan wrote:
I am wondering if it is more that the literate develop their non-literalness, or if those with a non-literal bent are drawn more towards literature?????


The latter methinks. Most of the engineering types I deal with read a lot but they tend to read more sceintific or technical stuff (have you ever read a Cisco Router manual? Exciting stuff there!) where the literal-ness (is that a word?) is reinforced. The articstic types I know have all read the classic literature and tend to read more novels than non-fiction.


Yes - I know what you mean.

Same with a lot of psychologists, I find - (with many sterling exceptions - a number of whomare good friends) - read a HUGE amount - but VERY literal. Odd. Psychiatrists, however, except for a few, that I have worked with, have NOT been literal.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:17 pm
hmm, here psychologists are more likely to have come through a science program than an arts program, and psychiatrists, well, they can come from just about anywhere. the psychologists are definitely the ones i'd expect to be more 'inside the box'.

Chronology - if I was looking for a watch, I'd probably wander into Chronology.

I'm trying to think if any of the big local studios are anything other than 'big name' studios.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:22 pm
Interesting about the literate/literal aspects of lives.

Hmmmmm....

Life stories......

Taken.

<rats>
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:28 pm
"Lifestory" might be available.

"Biography" might be available.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:34 pm
"Photobiography" might be available.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:37 pm
Oh it's back open?

Turning that part of my brain back on just a sec...

*click*

What about what I asked before, if it were a plant or flower?

Sequoia?

Elements for me: Interesting word, works well with "studio", good logo opportunities, a certain element of age/ remembrance/ history, element of beauty, have 'em in Portland (I checked)
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:39 pm
This is getting even more obscure, but:

Quote:
The word sequoia was selected to honor Sequoyah (also spelled Sequoia), or George Guess (1770?-1843), Native American inventor of the Cherokee alphabet. The name was unexplained by its author, an Austrian linguist and botanist. The name sempervirens means evergreen


That carries connotations of recording history...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:40 pm
Lol - Bio-pics????
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:42 pm
Life Aspects?

Aspects on Life?

Enchanting Aspects?

Fresh Aspects?

Physiognomy?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:44 pm
www.sequoiaphotography.com and .net are available... (not studio though)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:45 pm
Gettin' worse and worse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Aspects in Amber (Hey - they've all seen Jurassic Park!!)
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:46 pm
Sempervirens?

Ooh....
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:48 pm
Carpe Diem!
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:48 pm
sempervirensstudios.com is available!

evergreen! get it?
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:48 pm
"Sequoia" seems to be in use already.

"Sitka" doesn't though. The world's largest Sitka Spruce sits not far outside the city.

Dlowan, Aspects in Amber sounds just a wee bit like a porno film to me!
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:49 pm
"Sempervirens Studios: Keeping Your Memories Evergreen"
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:51 pm
I have to confess, that one had me stumped until you explained it, soz!

All of the natives probably know that word though.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 05:58 pm
My understanding (I thought I'd make baby clothes and market them for a while, or at least it was a diverting thought, did some research) is that the existence of a name on someone else's company isn't enough to preclude you from using it -- it has to be that the other company is in the same business. So if there is a Sequoia that's a restaurant, doesn't affect you -- if there is a Sequoia photographic studio, that's where it gets tricky.

fishin'?
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2005 06:08 pm
I don't know, soz.

The site I'm using to check registered names in Oregon has a "most restrictive" function that I've been searching on - that way you have a greater chance of knowing whether it will go through.

It even checks homonyms, alternate spellings, punctuation, capitalization, abbreviations etc. etc. etc.

When you type in a name it gives you a list of other business whose name may affect your ability to use it.

Oregon seems to be pretty restrictive.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 10:14:13