Reply
Fri 31 Dec, 2004 02:28 pm
WASHINGTON -- Republican leaders are considering a change in House ethics rules that could make it harder to discipline lawmakers.
The proposal being circulated among House Republicans would end a general rule against any behavior that might bring "discredit" on the chamber, according to House Republican and Democratic leadership aides. House members would be held to a narrower standard of behavior in keeping with the law, the House's rules and its ethics guidelines.
Other proposed changes to the ethics committee's rules being circulated in a "Dear Colleague" letter from House Rules Chairman David Dreier, R-Calif., would let House members respond to any admonishment before a letter goes out from the committee, and would end an investigation if there is a tie vote.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., plans to bring the proposal before a meeting of all House Republicans next week "and see what they think," said Hastert spokesman John Feehery.
Sometimes wouldn't ya just like to reach out and smack 'em upside the head and tell 'em to grow up and start acting like the responsible adults they are supposed to be?
republicans....responsible????? you've got to be kidding. Look at the gop Presidents for the last 130 years....all corrupt. Ike was the only republican that was honest, and he warned about the party and their war machine (for profits) No profits in quick decisive victorys...long drawn out quagmires...thats where the profits are!!
I would not restrict dishonesty and deceit solely to republicans. The sad fact is that inorder to get anywhere in the political arena one must have larceny in his/her heart.
au1929
Sadly, I believe you're right.......It seems to be the nature of the (political) beast. Corruption seems to go hand in hand with these politicians. David Dreier (Republican congressman from the San Gabriel Valley of the Los Angeles area) has got to be one of the biggest horses ass in congress. If the ethics rules don't fit their agenda, hell, change the rules..............?