1
   

What some historians think of Dubya

 
 
Reply Wed 29 Dec, 2004 05:34 pm
is here
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 597 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Dec, 2004 06:09 pm
Quote:
Some voters may judge such assessments to be wrong, but they are assessments informed by historical knowledge and the electorate ought to have them available to take into consideration during this election year.


His last sentence. Laughing
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Dec, 2004 12:16 pm
Any historian would tell you that any Presidents actual impact is not felt until at least several years have passed once they are OUT OF OFFICE.

How any historian can rate any President WHILE THEY ARE STILL in office is laughable.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Dec, 2004 12:18 pm
woiyo is right, except that if I were a Bush fan, I wouldn't be looking forward to historians' future assessments. But we shall see...
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Dec, 2004 01:35 pm
I wish someone would find Bush a pliable intern... maybe he'd lighten up a little.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What some historians think of Dubya
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2022 at 05:30:30