OCCOM BILL wrote: You guys really can't see the similarities, eh? Yes FreeDuck, WWII was a good idea, even though it caused massive destruction and poverty on a large scale... and war is hell. The point is; there has always been a percentage of the population that will predict the worst. I've seen posted dozens of Vietnam era headlines always to a volley of agreement... so sure are we that our efforts will ultimately fail. Here you have a story that draws a direct parallel to the sentiments many A2Kers spread about Iraq daily. How do they respond? With the typical scorn, that any such story receives, if it doesn't Blame America First.
I'm going to assume that you mean that our involvement in WWII was a good idea and not that the actual war was a good idea.
I am just a little disappointed to see you toss about lines like 'you liberals' and 'Blame America First' as it seems to be signalling a bit of a shift in your thinking. I don't recall you parroting right wing garbanza like this before the election.
There is a very big difference between what went on in the aftermath of WWII, which according to your article involved massive looting by US soldiers, and what is going on right now in Iraq. In Iraq, we are the sole reason there is a problem there in the first place. It was our choice when where and how to invade. We had a responsbility to plan the aftermath. We apparently had a very good previous example, the one you've posted about, to learn from. It could be that everything will turn out okay in the end, but that doesn't make what's going on right now acceptable, and it doesn't excuse the lack of planning and poor decision making that is the hallmark of the architects of this war.