Do you believe in a young Earth Creation of 6000 years?

Reply Tue 20 Jun, 2017 07:16 pm
I am a Christian but not a literal Young Earth Christian

Fundamentalists of the “young earth” variety will often claim that the earth is just 6,000 years old.

Their reasoning? "That the Bible says so". (Which it does not!)

I’m continually amazed at how the nonsensical young earth view of the universe is considered a foundational bedrock of their Christian faith.

They will frequently claim that believing in a universe that is anything more than a few thousand years old is a threat to the entire faith system.

I suppose it goes like this: The Bible dates the earth = if you can’t trust the Bible on that one point, you can’t trust any of it = all Christian faith hinges on a young earth.

There’s only one, massive, glaring problem with that: The Bible does note date the creation of the Universe. 

Dating the age of the universe is not a question the Bible deals with. It wasn’t even on the radar of the people who wrote it.

Here’s the roundabout way young-earth fundamentalists arrive at their young earth position:

The Bible does give detailed genealogies of the ancestors of Jesus, which include how long an individual was reported to have lived. When you add up the lifespans of all those listed in the biblical genealogies, add 2,000 years since Christ, you get somewhere around 6,000 or so. And that is the entire argument of young-earth creationism.

While young-earth creationism is tragically flawed on multiple counts, its ultimate flaw is that it fails to take the Bible seriously, all while claiming a higher view of Scripture than anyone else.

You see, ancient genealogies such as those listed in Genesis are not absolute, never-skip-anyone, genealogies, because that’s not how ancient Hebrew genealogies even work.

Thus, if Joe was the dad of Frank, and Frank had a son named Larry, in an ancient genealogy it would be entirely normal to say, “Joe begat Larry” even though Joe is technically the grandfather of Larry.

We even see this in the New Testament where Jesus is called the “Son of David.” Obviously, Jesus was not the son of David, but in the ancient language, it was completely permissible to say so since Jesus did, in fact, come from the line of David.

That’s just how these things work.

But even if these genealogies were absolute, that still doesn’t date the earth– but we can get into those issues another time.

Unfortunately, young-earth creationists, not only fail to take science seriously, they truly fail to take the Bible seriously.

Instead, they try to read and interpret the Bible through Western eyes, with modern questions, giving no thought to ancient language, context, ancient cultures, genre, or a host of other issues that biblical scholars deal with on a daily basis.

It gives people a false impression of Christianity, the Bible, and quite honestly, it makes us look silly.

In the end, the idea that the Bible teaches the earth is 6,000 years old is total nonsense and those who take the Bible seriously would or should know that.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 1,203 • Replies: 0
No top replies


Related Topics

Is The Bible Just a Good Book? - Question by anthony1312002
What Is Wrong With Christmas Customs? - Discussion by anthony1312002
Do Christian lives matter? - Discussion by gungasnake
Satan (a discussion) - Question by Smileyrius
"Thy kingdom come". What's that about? - Question by neologist
Where are all the churches in the mist of this? - Discussion by reasoning logic
No God in Christianity - Question by Cyracuz
  1. Forums
  2. » Do you believe in a young Earth Creation of 6000 years?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/25/2024 at 10:22:57