Science Deniers are Everywhere

You also assume something: that they are all bona fide climatoligist doubters. You didn't check that.

So is it your contention that manmade Co2 is causing global warming?

Wacky assumptions are you, Olivier. You are in a league with oralloy and farmerman.

Again, the stunning hypocrisy.

Read through this document. I think it can be read just fine "without a scientific background." (BTW, that's a rather demeaning attitude to have in this discussion.)

In December 8 2009, 166 scientists from around the world wrote an Open Letter to the UN Secretary-General rebuking the UN and declaring that “the science is NOT settled.” On May 1, 2009, the American Physical Society (APS) Council decided to review its current climate statement via a high-level subcommittee of respected senior scientists. The decision was prompted after a group of over 80 prominent physicists petitioned the APS to revise its global warming position and more than 250 scientists urged a change in the group's climate statement in 2010. The physicists wrote to APS governing board: “Measured or reconstructed temperature records indicate that 20th - 21st century changes are neither exceptional nor persistent, and the historical and geological records show many periods warmer than today.”

Some other fake lists, huh? What else is new?

I dont have a memberhip count from 2010 but at todays membership total, the numbers you quote are roughly 0.3 percent (not 3 %). Thats generally an amount we all see in various techy organizations. American Geophysical Union has about 0.4% CReationists qand l3ss than 0.2% climate change deniers,(and about 0.01% 9/11 conspiracy wackos)

You are the conspiracy wacko, farmerman, as you support a conspiracy theory, the US government one, that is shot full of holes.

You, the "scientist".

The scientist who is scared out of his mind to even discuss science.

We have a large percentage of the US population who supports a completely unscientific US government conspiracy theory, another large percentage who don't even know anything about the US government conspiracy theory, save for the propaganda movies, and farmerman the scientist loves this scenario.

University of Massachusetts professor Lynn Margulis accurately described NIST's approach and denial of evidence as “the most unscientific thing you could think of.”

Hey, aren't you the guy who claimed that it would take a huge amount of thermite or explosives to significantly weaken the core of the WTC, but didn't even consider that you also believed that it was allegedly weakened to the point of collapse WITHOUT any help from explosives? Yeah, I remember you. Who wouldn't?

Perhaps you'd care to produce something that would indicate how many Climatologists comprise that vast majority of scientists that believe that manmade Co2 is causing global warming.

Errr... yeah!

"Manmade" doesn't work too well in that sentence but what the...

I sai nothing of the sort. My comments were that NO sesimic evidence supporteed the wacko boys and that there was relly no evidence of "Tannerite" residue or ant explosive.
HOW MANY 9/11 wackos does it take to add up to an IQ of 70??

You're comments were never comments. They were shrill bits of nothing meant to divert. That is, for the few times the "scientist" even showed up.

Remember, you are the wutectic guy who then speedily abandoned the issue YOU raised.



Let me see, there is Chris Mohr, ... and you, farmerman. Is that 70 yet?

I suspect some of them SUBSTRACT from the total.

"My comments", precisely, farmerman. Never any science, just your screaming, hardly decipherable "comments".

The science from you fellas who pretend to science always amazes me.

As does your spelling, Olivier.

Not talking about seismic data. You just don't remember what you said. It doesn't mean anything about you; just that you're forgetful.

The Possessive Belief

CO2 (carbon dioxide) is not causing global warming or climate change. I can’t say it more boldly, but it doesn’t seem to matter; the belief persists that CO2 is the cause and therefore a problem. The belief is enhanced by government policies and plans, which spawn businesses to exploit the opportunities they create. A majority of the mainstream media pushes the belief because of political bias rather than understanding of the science. Evidence continues to show what is wrong with the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), but it is complex and so most don’t understand. The fact they hold definitive positions without understanding is disturbing. However, ignoring the fact that IPCC predictions are always wrong doesn’t require the understanding that the science is completely unacceptable and proof of the political bias.

The 2007 IPCC Report claimed with over 90% certainty that human produced CO2 is almost the sole cause of global warming. But the evidence shows this can’t be true; temperature changes before CO2 in every record of any duration for any time period; CO2 variability does not correlate with temperature at any point in the last 600 million years; atmospheric CO2 levels are currently at the lowest level in that period; in the 20th century most warming occurred before 1940 when human production of CO2 was very small; human production of CO2 increased the most after 1940 but global temperatures declined to 1985; from 2000 global temperatures declined while CO2 levels increased; and any reduction in CO2 threatens plant life, oxygen production, and therefore all life on the planet.

http://drtimball.com/2011/co2-is-not-causing-global-warming/

None of this is true. A long list of lies you got there...

By the way, how was it determined that 97% of scientists believe that global warming is caused by Co2 emissions? I mean, how many scientists were asked, and who asked them?

Well, okay Dr. Olivier. If you say so.