21
   

Science Deniers are Everywhere

 
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 02:47 pm
@Glennn,
Scroll back and you'll find a link I added to an article that explains the methodology behind the claim
camlok
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 02:48 pm
@Olivier5,
Let me introduce to you, the one and only Billy Shears and while I'm at it, Olivier and his usual science.

"None of this is true. A long list of lies you got there..."
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 02:49 pm
I'm truly interested in the thoughts of CC True Believers now that Trump has pulled the US out of the Paris Accords.

Does this mean humanity is doomed?
camlok
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 02:50 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
I'm truly interested in the thoughts of ...


You have no shame whatsoever, Finn.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 02:59 pm
@Glennn,
Why can't you check for yourself? Take these claims one by one and see if they pan out. None of them does.
Olivier5
 
  3  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:02 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Long term prognosis: yes.
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:03 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Why can't you check for yourself? Take these claims one by one and see if they pan out. None of them does.


This, above, and all you pretenders are the embodiment of Kafkaesque, Olivier. You guys are another Franz Kafka novel.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:05 pm
@Olivier5,
I see that you're maintaining your science at your usual levels, Olivier.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:07 pm
@Olivier5,
Trump , never one to be accused of being intelligent, plays to his base. Hes hoping that the next president will be able to "stop the press" before this clowns edict becomes law. He will be out before 2021
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:09 pm
@Glennn,
I may be forgetful but I never said that because I know better. I argued along with those not bereft of common sene . Many of us stated that the beams Could easily bend because it never took a melt temperature to induce deformation.

"Youre not talking about seismic data"" SO youve given up arguing that point eh? Good, Admitting ones mistakes is the first step to recovery
Glennn
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:09 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Why can't you check for yourself?

I'm not the one touting the 97% claim; you are. If you don't know, then just say so.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:10 pm
@farmerman,
the timing is interesting

what is the earliest date the US can actually pull-out?

the day after the next American federal election

why did he wait til now to make the announcement? could have done it weeks/months ago.
Glennn
 
  0  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:11 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Thanks. I'm just curious to see if Olivier understands what he's talking about.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/10/an-oopsie-in-the-doranzimmerman-97-consensus-claim/
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:12 pm
@ehBeth,
yep, hes also a coward who is grovelling to his base.
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:14 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
I may be forgetful but I never said that because I know better


You never once showed you know anything at all, farmerman, except diversion, which, characteristically, you were also bad at.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:15 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

yep, hes also a coward who is grovelling to his base.


Oh stop... "groveling"... sheesh. A bit melodramatic, don'tcha think?

This is another thing that he campaigned on and now it's done. I suspect we will return on better terms and possibly with a Congress approved deal. Or, maybe he'll make the Trump Climate Accords and invite the countries that want to be clean AND successful to join.
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:24 pm
@farmerman,
Have you never wondered, farmerman, why all your legions of followers have never said to you, "Go to a 911 discussion thread, farmerman, and show them with your science that you are right/the US government official conspiracy theory is right and they are wrong?"

I 'm pretty sure that they saw the "science" you brought and for the ones as dishonest as you, would never consider saying such a thing.

Something that is so true, so absolute should be able to stand on its merits. And yet no one ever is even willing to state what the merits of the US government official conspiracy theory are.

Strange!

Science Deniers are Everywhere!!!
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  3  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:25 pm
@ehBeth,
http://www.livescience.com/59337-trump-leaves-paris-climate-deal-effects.html


Quote:
Without the United States, other signatories on the deal will likely soldier on, experts say. But the likelihood of international cooperation on carbon-cutting goals past 2025 is on far shakier ground, and the United States will be forfeiting a seat at the table to shape the climate future.


India in particular has been making great strides in technology development - and use. China is not far behind.


farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:26 pm
@McGentrix,
Or he tries to take credit for the sunrise again.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 1 Jun, 2017 03:29 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
India in particular has been making great strides in technology development - and use. China is not far behind.


Why should these countries, in their developing country/economy stages, not be able to have at least a couple of centuries of massive pollution like the USA had?
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/16/2025 at 04:05:37