Science Deniers are Everywhere

@farmerman,

Quote:

I actually think that its moe in the order or 0.3% not 3% of scientists that object or disagree with the CAUSES of Global Warming.

The "scientist" making more of his wacky notions without a shred of proof. And there are some gullible people who trust this fabricator.

Quote:

Its like the same guys (like Steve Jones) who, over and over and over, print up self published crap about 9/11 that the conspiracy yahoos claim is "Scientific fact"

Yup, the science that framerman has never once honestly faced. The "scientist" who can't address on issue raised by scientists like Steven Jones.

"self published crap" - farmerman the "scientist" lies again and the brave, honest people of A2k never call him on his lies.

0 Replies

@maxdancona,

Quote:

I don't think you are actually reading peer reviewed papers... you seem to be googling for people who agree with you.

Oh, the stunning hypocrisy, Max.

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Quote:

Link?

You are a laugh and a half, Olivier. Mr Zero Proof, Mr Zero Links, Mr Planned Diversions, ... .

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Quote:

They got Nagazaki[sic] and Hiroshima right.

So now you are celebrating war crimes, Olivier. What a dandy "human being".

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Are you sure you're not Bill Nye the Nasty Guy?

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

I'm just the guy who says it as he sees it. Put me on ignore if you need to.

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Quote:

Link?

Sure.

http://www.cfact.org/pdf/2010_Senate_Minority_Report.pdf

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

I'm just the guy who says it as he sees it. Put me on ignore if you need to.

And deprive myself of your wit and wisdom? Never!

And "as you see it," perhaps "we" should have let Australia fry?

Nice perspective.

1 Reply

@Glennn,

Climate Depot is sponsored by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a conservative think tank that has received funding from ExxonMobil and Chevron.

1 Reply

@maxdancona,

Quote:

I don't know what more the scientific community can do on this issue.

Then they need to hang up there scientist hats and address it as citizens like the rest of us must do.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

That was aimed at Glenn, who seems to think that Global Warming is not worth doing ****. I'm just pointing that if world leaders had followed his approach -- "let's do nothing cause who cares?" -- when dealing with the ozone layer hole, his country, Australia, would be morphing into a skin cancer hellhole right now...

Got it?

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Olivier5 wrote:

That was aimed at Glenn, who seems to think that Global Warming is not worth doing ****. I'm just pointing that if world leaders had followed his approach -- "let's do nothing cause who cares?" -- when dealing with the ozone layer hole, his country, Australia, would be morphing into a skin cancer hellhole right now...

Got it?

I realize that and it was still nasty, which is par for the course with CC Zealots like you and Bill Nye who think it is acceptable to force those who disagree with you to shut the hell up, even if it means imprisoning them.

You think you are saving humanity and the earth but you are just another tinpot tyrant.

2 Replies

@Olivier5,

Quote:

Climate Depot is sponsored by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a conservative think tank that has received funding from ExxonMobil and Chevron.

Are you claiming that the thousand scientists that are quoted in the link I provided are receiving money from ExxonMobil and Chevron?

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote:

who think it is acceptable to force those who disagree with you to shut the hell up, even if it means imprisoning them.

Again, you describe yourself, Finn. That's always been your downfall, your stunning hypocrisy, your refusal to look at reality. You play a pretty good game but if one looks a little it is easy to see thru.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Sorry if I hurt your feelings, Finn. Rest assured it was a joke. I always was in favor of protecting the ozone layer.

Were you?

0 Replies

@Glennn,

No. I'm saying you're using as a source of disinformation on climate change a site paid for by big oil companies. They are conmen. You're their dupe.

2 Replies

@Olivier5,

Quote:

I'm saying you're using as a source of disinformation on climate change a site paid for by big oil companies. They are conmen. You're their dupe.

This is what happens when you are fundamentally dishonest, Olivier, which you are.

Who paid for but underfunded, then wrote the agenda and the results for the Kean-Hamilton Commission, ahead of time?

Who funded the NIST study - the very guys who told massive but such transparent lies, which led all the idiots to support their illegal invasions into Iraq and Afghanistan?

You guys are such stunning hypocrites.

And they called you a cheese-eater to boot. And still you're their dupe.

0 Replies

@Olivier5,

Quote:

No. I'm saying you're using as a source of disinformation on climate change a site paid for by big oil companies.

So you're saying that the thousand scientists whose quotes are found at the link I provided did not receive money from ExxonMobil and Chevron. Good. However, you are nevertheless willing to insinuate that these scientists are dishonest shills for oil companies. Not good.

1 Reply

@Glennn,

How would I possibly know who among them has been paid and not? I would have to look at them one by one. I'd rather assume that it's a mix of non-specialists; specialists that ARE actually BELIEVERS of AGW; perhaps a few scientists paid-for by big oil; and the occasional bona fide specialist who happens to doubt the standard theory. That's always been the case in the past with such lists.

2 Replies

@Olivier5,

Quote:

How would I possibly know who among them has been paid and not?

Exactly!

Quote:

I'd rather assume . . .

Exactly!

1 Reply

Science Deniers are Everywhere

Quick Links

My Account

able2know