21
   

Science Deniers are Everywhere

 
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:13 pm
@Olivier5,
You and FM would love to reduce the discussion of your use of caps to something trivial.

My original comment about them was something of a trivial barb which is something you've had no compunction about launching yourself, and that's all well and good.

It became an issue when you denied that your use of caps was unintentional. That is demonstrably false and for someone who gets so fired up about the truth, really hypocritical.

You could have easily responded to me something like "Who gives a ****?" but you decided to lie.

Everyone lies. I don't know why you would about such a silly thing but it doesn't make you a bad person. It does, to some extent, make you a hypocrite...and so needlessly so.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:15 pm
@ossobucotemp,
If we're boring you...

The issue isn't Olivier's use of caps, it's his lying that it wasn't intentional.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:16 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
You and FM would love to reduce the discussion of your use of caps to something trivial
I have to admit , that's what Ive done. I cannot believe that you are all torqued up about it.
Relax ole fella,
Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:17 pm
@farmerman,
Tx for the idea, made my day.

I'm a bit surprised i could access the edit screen after your reply.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:19 pm
@farmerman,
OK pat yourself on the back for your juvenile behavior.

I very much doubt I gave you "royal hell" for using "it" to reference JTT but you're free to offer evidence.

It was rude and you know it. You didn't use the pronoun because of your scientific training, you used it to be rude.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:20 pm
@Olivier5,
too bad we have such a very limited pallette of color values. Ive always wanted to post in a pattern with a very light value color against a really dark complement.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:22 pm
@farmerman,
I'm not all torqued up about it, but that is a typical rejoinder from you. When you can't offer a reasonable response to a post, you ridicule it.

Oliver's use of caps is trivial, his lying about his intention to use them is not a major league issue but considering his expressed passion about the truth is instructive.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:22 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Are you a closet PC snowflake or what?
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:24 pm
@Olivier5,
So you intend to continue to deny that you lied when you asserted your use of caps was unintentional.

Yes or no?
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:28 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
duhhh, ya think?? while I ws still speaking with JTT, anyone here could see that it was a rude, insane, inane and a veryscary character with an unreasonably inflated view of its world opinions.
IM certainly glad that Im not responsible to monitor its daily dosage of antipsychotics.
Back when I was still communicating with it, it sounded off about how justified the Empire of Japan was in its effort at gaining trns pcific Empire. MILLIONS of lives lost before the USA even entered the WWII.(Not just the argument regarding the use of an QA bomb to help wend it).

Its fuckin crazy and I dont care who knows my opinion . (It has not risen to our species and subspecies)
Olivier5
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:30 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Yes. To say the absolute truth I am not 100% certain but given the obvious typos in the text and the lack of need for emphasis on those words, it's most likely that i rushed to post some garbled stuff.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:31 pm
@farmerman,
I'm no fan of JTT, but neither am I a fan of low brow and gratuitous insults of him/her.

If you're proud of the way you've dealt with him/her so be it.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:31 pm
EVEN POOTY POOT GETS ONE SO WHY CANT I??
   https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.rOL5WD_wOoNXu0HuBseAWQEsDX&w=265&h=187&c=7&qlt=90&o=4&dpr=1.75&pid=1.7

Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:32 pm
@Olivier5,
Sketchy admission.

Should we recall your posts to prove otherwise?
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:32 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Are you suggesting that that would surprise you, Finn? You never watched/read Olivier's and farmerman's behavior in the 911 Physics thread.

Lies, lies lies. And more, the stuff you can read from farmerman in the post below yours to Olivier.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:33 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
you've dealt with him/her so be it
Yep, it be "it"
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:34 pm
@farmerman,
OK then
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:47 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
It bothers me not at all, Finn. You should be addressing the totally unscientific manner that the scientist farmerman, and the hypocrite/liar Olivier have dealt with the science of 911.

But, I realize that's not an area you wish to tread.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:49 pm
@camlok,
Oh shut the **** up.
I was defending you.
I've been far more understanding of you than you have been of me.
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2017 02:53 pm
@farmerman,
The childish scientist, outed by Finn.
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/16/2025 at 05:53:33