How dumb can americans get?

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Dont blame me I'm not asking the question, this was asked by the Daily Mirror this morning.

http://images.icnetwork.co.uk/upl/mirror/nov2004/1/0/000ADF94-E181-1189-B6E080BFB6FA0000.jpg

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,054 • Replies: 18

No top replies

Don't ask me, I'm from a BLUE state. We feel very isolated, here on the Pacific coast.

0 Replies

55,574,580 of us knew better...

0 Replies

I didn't realize it was a contest.......

0 Replies

Well how silly of 59M Americans to think that Daily Mirror knows better than they do about how to vote in their nation.

0 Replies

Quote:

I didn't realize it was a contest.......

isn't that what we call something that has a winner and a loser?

0 Replies

Region Philbis wrote:

Quote:
I didn't realize it was a contest.......
isn't that what we call something that has a winner and a loser?

see...dumb american :wink: Laughing

0 Replies

Piffka wrote:

Don't ask me, I'm from a BLUE state. We feel very isolated, here on the Pacific coast.

Me too!

http://www.mainzelahr.de/smile/cool/yo.gif

0 Replies

I've asked myself the same question. Record deficit, most jobs lost in 75 years, gas prices through the roof and a war for no reason. I'm astonished. What good did George W. do?? If it weren't for 9/11 I suspect Georgie boy wouldn't have been reelected.

0 Replies

If it weren't for 9/11 none of those other problems would be such a problem.

0 Replies

Apparently, 56M of them were dumb enough to nominate John Kerry for president.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

Apparently, 56M of them were dumb enough to nominate John Kerry for president.

hmmm... 59m for bush. and only a measley 56m for kerry. you're right cj. nobody at all voted for kerry.

good thing that it's only about 1/2 of the country that is out of the "mainstream".

0 Replies

'If it weren't for 9/11 I suspect Georgie boy wouldn't have been reelected.'

Hard to say since 9/11 was directly (or indirectly) responsible for everything you list there.

Except for the gas prices...blame that on those who don't wish to see us energy independant.

0 Replies

We simply do not defeat an incumbent president in wartime. After wars surely, but never in their midst.

0 Replies

Kristie wrote:

If it weren't for 9/11 none of those other problems would be such a problem.

As I've said before, we've had worse wars and more expensive tragedies, but never such a deficit. Accepting responsibility is the first step to rational policy.

0 Replies

Joanie wrote:

We simply do not defeat an incumbent president in wartime. After wars surely, but never in their midst.

Allowing war to insulate a presidency creates perverse incentives.

0 Replies

Step, I agree....we should spend less.

0 Replies

Where to begin spending less?

Are we going to cut health care funding, school funding? Scientific research?

At some point, maybe we should think about taking in more as well as spending less?

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Where to begin spending less?

Are we going to cut health care funding, school funding? Scientific research?

At some point, maybe we should think about taking in more as well as spending less?

Cycloptichorn

Normally, I would hesitate to "take in more," but at this point, we have enough of a problem that prudent budget cutting will not do the trick, particularly given the needy state of some of our existing programs. Yes, we overspent during these last four years, and I agree--we need to approach that problem from both a "revenue" and an "expense" angle. As a generally small gov. sort of guy, this makes me wince--but policy making isn't a cakewalk.

0 Replies

How dumb can americans get?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know