1
   

The NEXT coming Oz election thread!

 
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jan, 2006 01:58 am
http://smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/01/14/cartoon140106_gallery__470x269,0.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jan, 2006 03:23 am
Seems to be a very common theme with the cartoonists in the weekend papers:

http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5096616,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jan, 2006 04:16 am
Interesting:

Tax slug on poor singles
Elizabeth Colman
January 14, 2006/the Australian



A NATIONAL underclass of single low-income earners will pay for Peter Costello's tax relief for families at the May budget as poor and middle-income workers face a growing tax burden despite the budget surplus windfall.


Families earning up to $50,000 a year, who pay no net tax after receiving family benefits, have again been earmarked for federal government help in the form of tax relief and other family assistance payments.

But research commissioned by the Opposition shows a single worker on $30,000 will pay $9720 total tax in the next two years, while a family earning $53,000 effectively pays nothing.

A week after the Treasurer pledged to give a "helping hand" to families earning between $40,000 and $50,000 a year, The Weekend Australian can reveal single and childless taxpayers in the same and lower income-tax brackets face a rising tax burden in the next two years as wage rises to match inflation increase their tax bill or push them into higher tax brackets.

Labourers, hairdressers, cleaners and clerks - among other low-income workers - will pay up to $45 a week more tax by 2008 through so-called bracket creep alone, without including any real wage increases.

A single worker or childless couple on $50,000 a year will pay $50 a week more tax in the next two years through bracket creep, research commissioned by Labor MP Craig Emerson from the Parliamentary Library shows.

Younger, poorer singles earning less than $52,000 a year - a group that traditionally lacks a tertiary degree and does not own a home or have children - have received minimal tax relief since 2000. ... <cont>

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,17818168%255E601,00.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jan, 2006 04:39 am
Not a good day today for the federal government! But what an amazing nerve! Read this.:

$5000 fee to release IR details
By Richard Baker
January 14, 2006/the AGE


THE Howard Government is refusing to release documents regarding its $55 million taxpayer-funded advertising campaign for industrial relations changes unless it receives a $5158 fee, prompting accusations of secrecy.

In response to a freedom-of-information request from The Age, the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations said it was not in the public interest to release documents without attaching the high fee because their disclosure would not further "public comment or governmental accountability".

Labor and the ACTU yesterday accused the Government of acting against the interests of the public by trying to discourage the release of documents about the advertising blitz by charging a high fee.

The documents sought by The Age related to correspondence between the office of Workplace Relations Minister Kevin Andrews and his department regarding the advertising campaign, which was produced by companies that run the Liberal Party's election advertising.

The Age appealed to the department to reduce the fee on the grounds the documents were in the public interest, particularly given the response to the new laws, concern about the amount of taxpayer money spent and Labor's failed High Court challenge to halt the advertising campaign. But a senior department bureaucrat responded: "I find that disclosure of documents to you under this freedom-of-information request would not, on balance, be in the public interest." ... <cont>

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/5000-fee-to-release-ir-details/2006/01/13/1137118970319.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jan, 2006 12:05 am
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/01/17/svCARTOON_gallery__470x329.jpg

http://www.theage.com.au/news/editorial/wa-leader-offers-a-profound-example-to-all-australians/2006/01/17/1137466989471.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jan, 2006 12:12 am
http://smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/01/17/cartoon1801_gallery__470x270,0.jpg

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200601/s1550373.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jan, 2006 12:15 am
http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5097637,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jan, 2006 05:29 pm
More on the Australian Wheat Board & the food for oil scandal. Today's AGE editorial:

Dealings with Saddam should be a lesson to Australia
January 19, 2006/AGE editorial

THE commission of inquiry into Australian companies' payments to the regime of former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein has wasted no time in exploding the claim that this scandal might be "a storm in a teacup". While a month of evidence is still to be presented, tested and weighed by commissioner Terence Cole, QC, former Australian Wheat Board chairman Trevor Flugge's claim that concerns were exaggerated and the Government's pre-emptive exoneration of AWB both look highly tenuous. Prime Minister John Howard ordered the inquiry under terms of reference that blatantly shielded his Government from scrutiny. He did so only after UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged all countries to act against companies named in the Volcker inquiry report into the oil-for-food program. In one of the world's worst corruption scandals, the finger of blame that was pointed so readily at the UN is now turning back to Australia.

Counsel assisting the inquiry, John Agius, SC, has already secured the first AWB admission of elaborately concealed payments to Iraq that breached UN sanctions. The first kickbacks involved trucking fees to a Jordanian company without trucks. It was an Iraqi front. Later, as payments escalated, AWB paid a separate "after-sales service fee" and even saw a chance to profit by reclaiming the money from the UN escrow account. In the last three years of Saddam's rule, Iraq received almost $300 million from AWB, which the Volcker report identified as the single biggest source of payments in the oil-for-food scandal.

The extent of consultations on wheat sales to Iraq is also being exposed. AWB chief executive Andrew Lindberg has confirmed he briefed Foreign Minister Alexander Downer in early 2003, a time in the lead-up to war when the minister should have been highly alert to any concerns about deals with the regime. Canadian claims of kickbacks to Iraq had been discussed with AWB by Australian officials. This week's hearings have already shown how inquiries into the AWB deals lead inexorably to questions about the role of Government officials. Acting Prime Minister Mark Vaile simply denies any official wrongdoing. He advised reporters to "let the Cole inquiry run its course, to analyse and look at the information available and to try and establish the facts". For that to be done properly, the inquiry's terms of reference must be widened. If the Government refuses, it can only be for political reasons of self-preservation.

The Government's attitude is a jarring contrast to the Prime Minister's call to pursue good governance and tackle corruption around the world in his address to last September's UN summit of world leaders. When visiting the Solomon Islands, Mr Howard warned even more bluntly that governments must launch "a frontal assault on corruption and poor governance". Right now, his Government is guilty of retreating from these issues.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jan, 2006 05:35 pm
http://smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/01/18/cartoon1901_gallery__470x246,0.jpg

Precisely! Shocked Evil or Very Mad
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jan, 2006 05:37 pm
http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5098417,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jan, 2006 06:17 pm
Nothing to hide!? Well there's certainly something to answer for! I mean, the Australian government knew of the AWB's corrupt dealings in Iraq. To some extent it sounds like they assisted the AWB's dealings with Iraq. So at the same time that the AWB was lining Saddam's coffers with millions of dollars the Australian government was involving Australian troops in the Iraq invasion. Outrageous! Shocked

Last Update: Thursday, January 19, 2006. 10:02am (AEDT)

Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer says people are making hysterical claims about AWB.(File photo) (Lateline)

Govt has nothing to hide over AWB: Downer

Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer has written to a national newspaper calling for calm over evidence emerging from the Cole inquiry into Australia's involvement in the Iraq oil-for-food scandal.

The inquiry has heard Australia's sole wheat exporter knew money it was paying for Iraq contracts was going to the regime of Saddam Hussein and that AWB's chief executive Andrew Lindberg discussed Iraqi wheat with Mr Downer in 2003.

In a letter published today in The Australian newspaper, the minister says his department is cooperating fully with the inquiry and he has nothing to hide.

"People should allow the commission to reach its conclusions before making hysterical claims in the media," he said.

The head of wheat exporter AWB is due to appear before the Cole inquiry in Sydney for a third day.

AWB general manager Andrew Lindberg faced a tough day of questioning yesterday and was at one stage warned by Commissioner Terrence Cole about his repeated failure to give direct answers. .... <cont>

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200601/s1550619.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jan, 2006 03:00 am
msolga wrote:
More on the Australian Wheat Board & the oil for food* scandal. Today's AGE editorial:

Dealings with Saddam should be a lesson to Australia
January 19, 2006/AGE editorial

THE commission of inquiry into Australian companies' payments to the regime of former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein has wasted no time in exploding the claim that this scandal might be "a storm in a teacup". While a month of evidence is still to be presented, tested and weighed by commissioner Terence Cole, QC, former Australian Wheat Board chairman Trevor Flugge's claim that concerns were exaggerated and the Government's pre-emptive exoneration of AWB both look highly tenuous. Prime Minister John Howard ordered the inquiry under terms of reference that blatantly shielded his Government from scrutiny. He did so only after UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged all countries to act against companies named in the Volcker inquiry report into the oil-for-food program. In one of the world's worst corruption scandals, the finger of blame that was pointed so readily at the UN is now turning back to Australia.

Counsel assisting the inquiry, John Agius, SC, has already secured the first AWB admission of elaborately concealed payments to Iraq that breached UN sanctions. The first kickbacks involved trucking fees to a Jordanian company without trucks. It was an Iraqi front. Later, as payments escalated, AWB paid a separate "after-sales service fee" and even saw a chance to profit by reclaiming the money from the UN escrow account. In the last three years of Saddam's rule, Iraq received almost $300 million from AWB, which the Volcker report identified as the single biggest source of payments in the oil-for-food scandal.

The extent of consultations on wheat sales to Iraq is also being exposed. AWB chief executive Andrew Lindberg has confirmed he briefed Foreign Minister Alexander Downer in early 2003, a time in the lead-up to war when the minister should have been highly alert to any concerns about deals with the regime. Canadian claims of kickbacks to Iraq had been discussed with AWB by Australian officials. This week's hearings have already shown how inquiries into the AWB deals lead inexorably to questions about the role of Government officials. Acting Prime Minister Mark Vaile simply denies any official wrongdoing. He advised reporters to "let the Cole inquiry run its course, to analyse and look at the information available and to try and establish the facts". For that to be done properly, the inquiry's terms of reference must be widened. If the Government refuses, it can only be for political reasons of self-preservation.

The Government's attitude is a jarring contrast to the Prime Minister's call to pursue good governance and tackle corruption around the world in his address to last September's UN summit of world leaders. When visiting the Solomon Islands, Mr Howard warned even more bluntly that governments must launch "a frontal assault on corruption and poor governance". Right now, his Government is guilty of retreating from these issues.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2006 06:54 pm
Reading my paper this morning & following the latest in the Cole enquiry. This is going to be huge! And it's only just started.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:12 pm
Remember the US screaming for Kofi Annan head over the oil for food rorts? I wonder if they'll want Johnny's head.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:37 pm
hingehead wrote:
Remember the US screaming for Kofi Annan head over the oil for food rorts? I wonder if they'll want Johnny's head.


They've probably forgotten who he is by now. :wink: Past his use-by date till the next time a token "coalition of whatever" is required. Yes, I remember the Kafoofle about Kofi Annan. (His son, wasn't it?) The thing is, this Australian Wheat Board rort is that it's by far the biggest abuse of the oil for food program, by any country, yet discovered. A cool $300 million! And it was our government's responsibility to the UN to oversee Australia's participation in the program. I'm certain, though, that no one important (like the PM, or Downer) recalls anything at all about what actually happened at the time. They never do. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:44 pm
But they'll need a 'coalition of the dying' real soon - they just have decide whether they're attacking Iran or Syria. Sigh.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 11:14 pm
hingehead wrote:
But they'll need a 'coalition of the dying' real soon - they just have decide whether they're attacking Iran or Syria. Sigh.


Laughing


I may laugh, but ....

Much as I'd like to think that such ideas are utterly ridiculous, hinge .... these days nothing, absolutely nothing can be ruled out ... Sad
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 12:03 am
But consider this for a minute: It's early 2003. It's the lead-up to the Iraq invasion. Surely John Howard has to have been talking to George Bush about the invasion that is soon to happen, right? After all, Australia is soon to part of that invasion, as a member of the "Coalition of the Willing".
In the meantime, the Australian Wheat Board is busily doing it's corrupt deals with Iraqi government officials. As a result, Saddam's coffers illegally received $300 million of UN Oil For Food money. Just a bit later in 2003, John Howard sends Australian troops to Iraq to support the US invasion against Saddam. Think about that implications of that!

I'm waiting to hear what the next exciting revelations of the Cole Enquiry will be. And let's hear from the government representatives (particulary Alexander Downer) about the government's knowledge of what actually took place.


[quote="msolga"]The extent of consultations on wheat sales to Iraq is also being exposed. AWB chief executive Andrew Lindberg has confirmed he briefed Foreign Minister Alexander Downer in early 2003, a time in the lead-up to war when the minister should have been highly alert to any concerns about deals with the regime. Canadian claims of kickbacks to Iraq had been discussed with AWB by Australian officials. [/quote]

extract from Dealings with Saddam should be a lesson to Australia Age Editorial/January 19, 2006

http://www.theage.com.au/news/editorial/dealings-with-saddam-should-be-a-lesson-to-australia/2006/01/18/1137553654184.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 02:33 am
A federal government cabinet reshuffle coming up. Malcom's looking hot, apparently! Laughing :

http://http://smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/01/22/23cartoon_gallery__470x285,0.jpg:
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 02:51 am
Snorkle....wheatgate.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Beached As Bro - Discussion by dadpad
Oz election thread #3 - Rudd's Labour - Discussion by msolga
Australian music - Discussion by Wilso
Oz Election Thread #6 - Abbott's LNP - Discussion by hingehead
AUstralian Philosophers - Discussion by dadpad
Australia voting system - Discussion by fbaezer
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 03/05/2025 at 12:13:55