1
   

The NEXT coming Oz election thread!

 
 
Adrian
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Oct, 2006 04:43 pm
Keating. For similar reasons to Hingehead.

Stott Despoja. She is the only politician around that actually seems to give a damn about young people.

Gillard. Potential PM material.

That's about it as far as federal politics goes.

Brown I would respect if he wasn't a nutjob greeny.
0 Replies
 
lezzles
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Oct, 2006 08:58 pm
Keating?

The real Paul shone through when he was asked about his involvement in granting permanent residence to the Mufti. He refused to answer any questions put to him by the reporters (And that is his right, no problems with him there) but when he singled out the female reporter and said something along the lines of "I am not answering questions, even when they come from someone as attractive as you" I could not help but cringe. That makes him little different from the Mufti.

Yep, her old man let her put her shoes on, put the baby in the crib, shut up the kitchen - take off her veil - and go and play at being a reporter, just like a real person.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 02:36 pm
You can take the man out of the NSW right, but you can't take the NSW right out of the man.


I was very struck by that rawther disgusting comment, too.....

Knowing Keating, he may have been playing a double irony game, but who knows?


Yerk.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 02:41 pm
Adrian wrote:
Keating. For similar reasons to Hingehead.

Stott Despoja. She is the only politician around that actually seems to give a damn about young people.

Gillard. Potential PM material.

That's about it as far as federal politics goes.

Brown I would respect if he wasn't a nutjob greeny.




I think Keating grasped the most crucial nettle of all in Oz life....Mabo....with decency and wisdom, and he should be enshrined for that alone.

Pity about what has happened re that since.


Natasha has bitten the dust, sadly.


I HOPE Gillard makes it.


I think Carmen Lawrence, though politically dead after the whole sordid mess in WA, has a lot of integrity.

And I DO admire Brown.


And a fella who went a while ago.....looked a bit like Yoda.....dammit, I can't recall the name!
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Oct, 2006 04:20 pm
I think you mean Harridine - Margo Kingston (in Not Happy John) gave bouquets to Harridine for being a man of principle, even though he is, as a staunch catholic, an arch conservative, unlike herself.

She even gives a bouquet to Pauline Hanson, not for her beliefs but for getting involved in the political process (and thus getting politically inactive people involved in politics at grassroots level) - and also for being herself and not induldging in the fine art of concealment. Who really knows what John Howard's agenda is? Chaplains in schools now? Squeezing out NGOs (because they lobby against him)?

Anyone see David Marr and Andrew Bolt's altercation on Insiders last Sunday? HA! Gotta love David.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Nov, 2006 05:31 pm
From 7.30 report last nightFull transcript

Quote:
JOHN HOWARD: Well, America is contributing 100 times the military presence in Iraq that Australia is. That doesn't mean to say that America doesn't value very deeply and dearly our contribution, but obviously in an arrangement like that both Britain and Australia and other countries all of us must acknowledge that the great bulk of the burden is being carried by the Americans. That's not to say they ignore views that we express. But my view very strongly is what I said a moment ago, that if the coalition leaves Iraq in circumstances seen as a defeat, that will be a terrible blow to the prestige of the United States, a huge defeat for the West and a spur, a boost, an encouragement, whatever you want to call it, to terrorist recruitment in our part of the world. {Hinge's emphasis}

KERRY O'BRIEN: But isn't this a dilemma of your own making? Like Mr Bush and Mr Blair, you went to war on a false premise. To the extent that Iraq is a mess, if it is becoming an impossible conflict to win, it is a mess of your own making, is it not?

JOHN HOWARD: Kerry, we went to war believing there were weapons of mass destruction and we were not alone. Even our political opponents said there were weapons.

KERRY O'BRIEN: But the bottom line is, it was a false premise. You went to war on a false premise and you're now in a quagmire.

JOHN HOWARD: Well, Kerry when you are presented with intelligence which you believe is credible and you make a judgment, you are always accountable for that judgment and I'm a person who accepts accountability for the judgments I made. I don't regret the decision was taken on the available intelligence. Intelligence can never be 100 per cent perfect. It was intelligence widely believed throughout the West, believed on both sides of politics. Even the French President, who was a profound Iraqi sceptic if ever there was one, acknowledged that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, or believed they did. But we've got to deal with

KERRY O'BRIEN: But the bottom line is that in the end you took a decision on poor information; no matter how many people believed in it or not, you took a decision on poor information. Iraq, by almost anybody's calculation, is now a mess. That makes it a mess of your making?

JOHN HOWARD: But, Kerry, the judgment I've got to make now is, is it in the interests of the coalition - the West, America, Britain, Australia and other countries - to withdraw in circumstances of defeat and retreat, and the answer to that is emphatically no.

KERRY O'BRIEN: You've made that point a number of times, but my question is, this is a real dilemma for you, for George Bush and Tony Blair, a real dilemma, knowing when to get out of Iraq, Iraq now being in a mess. Is that not a dilemma of your own making?

JOHN HOWARD: Kerry, I'm not going to engage in political commentary, I'm going to tell you what my policy is and my policy is to be part of a coalition that does not leave Iraq in circumstances where it is seen as a defeat for the West and a boost for the terrorists. That is the most important responsibility I have at the present time. The Australian people will make judgments about any claimed dilemmas I have; the Australian people will pass a judgment. I would expect the Australian people to think very carefully about a Prime Minister or a government that took part in an action that fatally or very badly damaged the prestige of the United States around the world.



He still won't acknowledge that the Coalition of the Willing went against UN rulings, on a false premise, and really f*cked up a country that was already pretty f*cked up - even though hordes of people here and abroad protested against military intervention and public opinion was clearly against it.

And to suggest that terrorist numbers will multiply when the jagged knife of western intervention is pulled out of Iraq when it is exactly that presence which has reinvigorated their numbers is disingenous spin at best.

AND WHERE THE HECK IS MSOLGA?
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Nov, 2006 05:43 pm
Some recent political cartoonies....

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/11/06/07toonmoir_gallery__470x351,0.jpg

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/10/30/3110_cartoon_gallery__470x287.jpg

http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5292934,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Nov, 2006 05:44 pm
Oh, this one from last week....

http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5291956,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
Adrian
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Nov, 2006 05:49 pm
Quote:
I would expect the Australian people to think very carefully about a Prime Minister or a government that took part in an action that fatally or very badly damaged the prestige of the United States around the world.


My god he is a lapdog.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Nov, 2006 01:06 am
Yep, he aint nothin but a lapdog, Adrian.
Totally blind to the grim reality as he sees his claim to greater glory vanish almost over-night. Just like that! Gone!
It'll take a while for Australians to cotton on (it always does!), but eventually he'll be seen for what he actually is & the harm that he's done this country will be crystal clear to even the most disinterested folk. He'll have an "interesting" place in Oz history, no doubt about that!

Sad, isn't it? How our longest serving, most "successful" prime ministers seem so enamoured of things foreign? Like that Menzies fellow, who apparently used to become quite depressed when he had to return home to all that Oz uncouthness .... all he really wanted to do was to hang around in the general vicinity of the queen of England. Some folk still see him as a hero of sorts, though ....

Oh well, eventually we'll have a leader who gets their priorities right & lasts the distance as well. Surely?

(Where the heck am I, hinge? Taking a wee break. A bit of a rough spell here & also right now I'm working on job applications for next year. Oh joy! It's nice to see someone else sending the cartoons & posts, though! Keep it up! Very Happy )
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Nov, 2006 01:17 am
The latest dispatch from GetUp:

Dear friends,

This week a huge wave of change is sweeping the United States. George Bush's Republican Party has all but lost control of both houses of the US Congress. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, a worldwide symbol of the administration's catastrophic failure in Iraq, has announced his resignation. President Bush's Iraq policy now clings by a thread - discredited and rejected at home and abroad.

So what now for Australia? The American people have finally forced the Bush administration to face its failure in Iraq. But the Australian Government appears to have no Iraq policy at all, other than to blindly support Bush's sinking ship. Tell John Howard it's time for an independent Australian foreign policy plan in Iraq, including a clearly defined exit strategy.

www.getup.org.au/campaign/DemandAustralianLeadership

As the months and years tick by, the Iraq war looks more like a never-ending nightmare. Independent reports estimate more than 500,000 Iraqis have been killed; millions are refugees. Experts warn civil war could soon pass the point of no return, while last month was one of the deadliest for Coalition troops since the war began.

As Australians, we have an obligation to do more than just wait for leadership from afar. Our Government must reclaim its independent foreign policy and moral responsibility for taking us to war in the first place, and John Howard must make it clear how much longer he plans keep Australian soldiers fighting George Bush's war without a workable plan for peace.

Help seize this critical moment in the global debate on Iraq to demand our Government think for itself, and give us real leadership. Tell John Howard he must no longer delay in setting out a plan for a new way forward, including a clearly defined exit strategy - and has until December 4, when Parliament concludes for the year, to deliver.

www.getup.org.au/campaign/DemandAustralianLeadership

Blind support has led us down a failed path. With America's future in Iraq open to debate like never before, Australians want an honest conversation with our Government, so we can find an honourable path forward - and home.

Thanks for taking action,
The GetUp team

Amen to that! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Nov, 2006 01:23 am
Anyone else walk against warming last Saturday? A good start to what's looking like a long campaign, it was! Very Happy :

http://www.getup.org.au/content/upload/images/campaigns/WalkAgainstWarming/hobart2.jpg

More photographs & coverage here:

http://www.getup.org.au/blog_details.asp?blog_post_id=103
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Nov, 2006 01:35 am
It's time. Well past time, surely? If even Barnarby Joyce finally gets it, why the hell can't John Howard & Phillip Ruddock?:

Last Update: Friday, November 10, 2006. 4:22pm (AEDT)

http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200611/r115188_363516.jpg

Protesters in Fremantle have demanded David Hicks be brought home. (ABC TV)

A-Gs demand immediate action on Hicks trial

State and territory attorneys-general have signed a declaration demanding the Commonwealth take action to ensure Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks is immediately brought to trial.

The federal Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, was heckled by dozens of protesters as he arrived at a meeting of the nation's attorneys-general in Fremantle in WA today.

The detainee's US military lawyer, Major Michael Mori, addressed the attorneys-general.

He expressed disappointment that Mr Ruddock declined an invitation to attend the presentation.

"It's disheartening that federal ministers won't fight for an Australian citizen to have the same rights as an American," he said.

The ministers signed what they are calling the Fremantle Declaration, which urges judicial fairness be applied in Hicks's case.

They say it is needed to protect the legal rights of Australians at home and abroad.

The Prime Minister, John Howard, says Hicks cannot be brought home without trial.

But he says he will again ask the United States to speed up Hicks's trial.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1785856.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Nov, 2006 06:33 am
Some amusing stuff from today's papers:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,1658,5300079,00.jpg

& from the AGE's letters page:


Dear Donald, stuff happens!


Congratulations, Mr Howard - you are now the sheriff!

Laughing
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Nov, 2006 11:25 pm
... & more.:

http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5301070,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Nov, 2006 11:32 pm
<sigh>

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/11/10/111106_editoon_gallery__470x284,0.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Nov, 2006 02:28 am
... still more! (the cartoonists will tire of this soon, but hey, they seem to be really having fun with this one! )

http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/11/12/1211CARTOON_gallery__470x334.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 03:29 am
JH's big moment of truth.:

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/11/13/1410_cartoon_gallery__470x290,0.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 03:36 am
Damn, damn, damn!!!!! Sad :

High Court dismisses challenge to IR laws
Sid Marris
November 14, 2006/the Australian


A BID by state government and unions to overturn the Howard Government's workplace relations laws has failed, in a ruling that may change the face of Australian Federalism.

By a majority of 5 to 2, the court not only defeated calls to overturn the legislation but also rejected challenges to specific parts of the Wordplace Relations Act.

Prime Minister John Howard said he was pleased with the historic declaration. "Australia at long last in 2006 has a national system of industrial relations law for a national economy," he said.

States expressed their disappointment at the result while the unions vowed to re-double their efforts to fight the reforms.

"Because something is found to be constitutional doesn't mean that it's fair," South Australian Premier Mike Rann said.

Federal Labor, which support the challenge but was not a party, said the only option for Australians who opposed to the changes was to use the ballot box. ... <cont>

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20754887-601,00.html
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 04:50 am
Still getting over the libs (let the market decide) making it harder for workers (who are finally in undersupply and in demand) to get a better deal.

You'd think their super payouts were relying on company profits....
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Beached As Bro - Discussion by dadpad
Oz election thread #3 - Rudd's Labour - Discussion by msolga
Australian music - Discussion by Wilso
Oz Election Thread #6 - Abbott's LNP - Discussion by hingehead
AUstralian Philosophers - Discussion by dadpad
Australia voting system - Discussion by fbaezer
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/23/2025 at 09:46:21