1
   

The NEXT coming Oz election thread!

 
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 06:35 am
What a surprise! A review for Media Watch!:

ABC chief hints at Media Watch review
Paul Kalina, Debi Enker and Matthew Ricketson
October 18, 2006/the AGE


A day after announcing new guidelines on political bias, the ABC's managing director has targeted Media Watch for review, prompting speculation the program will be changed radically. .... <cont>

http://www.theage.com.au/news/tv--radio/abc-chief-hints-at-media-watch-review/2006/10/17/1160850931618.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 06:37 am
http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5277357,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 06:43 am
http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/10/16/1710_cartoon_gallery__470x263,0.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 06:59 am
Back to parliament's decision earlier today. And already the rorting frenzy has begun .... <sigh>:

Media laws rushed through parliament
October 18, 2006/the Australian

A MASSIVE overhaul of Australia's media ownership laws has passed parliament after the government used its numbers to gag debate.

At least 10 Labor MPs had wanted to speak on the draft laws - the biggest shake-up of media ownership in 20 years.

But debate was cut short at 11am - three hours early - and the bill was passed by 77 votes to 55 a little over an hour later.

Labor backbencher John Murphy told parliament the laws would lead to a stranglehold on media ownership and give the Packer family everything the late media mogul Kerry Packer had ever wanted.

"Kerry Packer isn't even stiff and already the market's announcing that Jamie Packer has increased the family fortune by 50 per cent and potentially could double the family fortune. Well what a disgrace," Mr Murphy said.

The amendments were lost along party lines in the House of Representatives, where the government holds a clear majority. ... <cont>

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20601923-601,00.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 07:20 am
So this is the "media diversity" we've been promised via the new laws? Rolling Eyes :

Probe into media deal scramble
October 18, 2006 - 6:41PM/SMH

Communications Minister Helen Coonan has called in corporate watchdogs to check if snap deals made by two of Australia's most powerful media barons are legal.

Just moments after the Government's controversial cross-media laws passed through parliament today, the Packer empire moved to divest half of its stake in key media assets.

And tonight Seven Network owner Kerry Stokes lifted a strategic holding in West Australian Newspapers to 14.9 per cent.

.......... Senator Coonan rejected suggestions that her laws were already looking like they would result in greater concentration of media ownership in Australia.

She said there would inevitably be changes in media ownership following the passage of the Government's reform package, but these would be subject to strict conditions.

Labor communications spokesman Stephen Conroy said it was already clear the Government's laws were going to see more power concentrated in the hands of existing media bosses.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/probe-into-media-deal-scramble/2006/10/18/1160850985633.html
0 Replies
 
lezzles
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 04:34 pm
And so the feeding frenzy begins......
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 09:21 pm
I see (this morning) that the feeding frenzy has turned to rampant gluttony already! Shocked


http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5278173,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 09:26 pm
James, James, you're such a low-brow! But admittedly a very, very rich one! And getting richer by the minute!:

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/10/18/1910_cartoon_gallery__470x268,0.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 09:30 pm
JH's interesting & original pronouncements #1:

Last Update: Thursday, October 19, 2006. 11:05am (AEST)

Howard says media buy-outs unrelated to new laws

The Prime Minister says it is a misunderstanding of the situation to say recent movement in the media industry is a direct result of new ownership laws. ... <cont>

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200610/s1768610.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 09:43 pm
JH's interesting & original pronouncements #2:

Howard wants Iraq stable before pull-out
October 19, 2006/the Australian

AUSTRALIAN troops will leave Iraq only when Prime Minister John Howard is satisfied the war-torn Middle East nation is stable.

"I want to see a democratic Iraq," Mr Howard told ABC Radio. ... <cont>

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20608630-601,00.html

Great!
Don't we all!
I wonder what it will take for JH to be "satisfied"?
Perhaps shortly after the US is? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 10:05 pm
It'd be interesting to hear what the federal Education Minister's version of the "facts" of this tragic event are. Apparently she thinks it was some kind of "accident" ..... Interesting: what "facts" should secondary school students be given in order to "form their own judgements"?:

Last Update: Thursday, October 19, 2006. 1:28pm (AEST)

Minister concerned at schools' SIEV X case study

The federal Education Minister, Julie Bishop, has accused the authors of a case study on the SIEV X maritime disaster of using the incident inappropriately to promote a political agenda.

More than 350 asylum seekers died when the boat known as the SIEV X sank on its way to Australia in 2001.

A group claiming no affiliation with any political organisation, has launched a case study of the disaster to be used in New South Wales secondary schools.

Ms Bishop says she has nothing against children being taught facts in history classes but she does have concerns about the plan to use the study in schools.

"A tragic accident should not be used to push a political agenda and students need to be given the facts, and not unsubstantiated rumour, in order to form their own judgements and form their own opinions about this matter."
.... <cont>

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200610/s1768811.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Oct, 2006 10:25 pm
If you're interested in the SIEV X tragedy & also the "children overboard" incident, here's speech by John Faullner (ALP) from 2003 - published by the Sydney morning Herald.:

Howard's 'disruption programme'
By Margo Kingston
July 23, 2003/SMH


As we ponder the lies our government told us on Iraq - on WMDs, on why he went to war, on when he decided to go to war - here's a speech John Faulkner, Labor's Senate leader and chief questioner at the unthrown children/SIEV-X inquiry, gave to the Fabian Society in Melbourne tonight on the inquiry's aftermath. ... <cont>

A Certain Maritime Incident - the aftermath

by John Faulkner
:

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/07/23/1058853131600.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Oct, 2006 12:02 am
This is enough to almost make me weep. The Age, the Sydney Morning Herald in the hands of Rupert Murdoch? Say it isn't so! What is the future (if any) of independant journalism in Australia? Sad :

The carve-up of John Fairfax has begun
By Stephen Mayne/ Crikey.com

The carve-up of John Fairfax, Australia's oldest and most venerable media company, is now underway.

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp spent $360 million last night securing a 7.5% stake in Fairfax at $5.20 a share, which sent the stock soaring 20c to $4.94 this morning.

Whilst a $6 billion News Corp takeover is patently ridiculous, given the dominance such a beast would have in newspapers, Rupert has taken a seat at the table for what he believes will be a board-driven carve-up.

"It is purely an investment and is entirely friendly to the existing Fairfax board," was how Rupert's mouthpiece Andrew Butcher explained it this morning.

Given that James Packer spent an hour with Fairfax chairman Ron Walker at Bondi's Lamrock Café last weekend, Australia's two richest families clearly both believe Walker's board can be charmed into a friendly break-up. And Walker claims to be old family friends of both the Murdochs and the Packers. Maybe Walker himself has eyes for one of the parts -- The Age?

The scenario is strikingly similar to 1987 when Rupert moved on the Herald & Weekly Times to keep its newspapers whilst its various radio and television assets were sold off as the curtain came down on a diverse independent media giant.

Whilst many pundits were expecting News Corp to make a move into free-to-air television, you need to remember the history. Rupert's father, Sir Keith Murdoch, first started out in journalism as Malvern correspondent for The Age in 1903. Add to this the fierce rivalry between Fairfax and Murdoch family interests for 70 years and it is not surprising that Rupert has launched what looks like a sentimental raid.

Rupert would love to cap his extraordinary career by owning The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald -- and this would be no problem if he flipped the Herald Sun and The Daily Telegraph into the new PBL Media vehicle.

One joker in the pack here could be Lachlan Murdoch. Rupert would love him to re-join News Corp but Sydney-based Lachlan could emerge as a stand-alone player or he could be flicked some assets in the carve-up to either run or own.

There will be endless scenarios played out over the coming months - does Rural Press want the regional papers, who gets the internet properties, how would a Packer-owned AFR cover PBL -- but the bottom line is that the once great independent media company John Fairfax probably won't exist by April Fool's Day next year.

And that will be a sad thing for Australia's democracy - particularly if the carve-up is conceived and directed by Australia's two richest families in concert with the utterly inappropriate Fairfax chairman, Ron Walker.

~
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Oct, 2006 01:35 am
Rolling Eyes Evil or Very Mad

As if anything else could have been anticipated!!!
A BIG change from the b/s she was sprouting on Lateline a couple of nights ago! This is a complete & utter sellout of media indpendence in this country. "Media diversity", my foot!:


New laws sparked frenzy, Coonan admits
October 20, 2006/the AUSTRALIAN

COMMUNICATIONS Minister Helen Coonan has admitted the government's new media ownership laws have been the catalyst for a series of strategic moves in the industry.

Overnight, News Corporation took a 7.5 per cent stake in its rival Fairfax, publishers of The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Australian Financial Review.

Earlier this week James Packer sold 50 per cent of some key media assets in a $4.5 billion deal which could fund future gaming and media acquisitions, while Kerry Stokes' Seven Network took a 14.9 per cent interest in West Australian Newspapers.

Senator Coonan said she was not surprised there had been some positioning by media companies ahead of the introduction of the new laws, passed by parliament this week but which are not expected to take effect until next year.

She said last week she did not expect the new media laws to spark a wave of takeovers.

This week's moves, Senator Coonan said, were because companies wanted to be in a good position to take advantage of what might unfold once the laws were proclaimed.

"I think the new media laws have been a catalyst and we are certainly not surprised there is some positioning," she told ABC Radio.

"I didn't say there wouldn't be any activity that could take place under the current law and that's in fact what's happened.

"It certainly is not as a result of the laws that have not been proclaimed."

Senator Coonan rejected suggestions her laws were already looking like they would result in greater concentration of media ownership in Australia.

"There hasn't been any mergers take place at all yet," she said. ... <cont>

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20614597-601,00.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Oct, 2006 01:58 am
http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5279302,00.jpg

Yep, he was just waiting for direction from his hero & leader. So much for "staying the course" ... "until the job is done"! Rolling Eyes

PM shifts ground on Iraq exit
Patrick Walters, National security editor
October 20, 2006/the Australian


JOHN Howard has declared that the existence of a "relatively stable" security situation in Iraq could be the trigger for the withdrawal of Australian troops, as security in the country deteriorates.

The comments represent a subtle repositioning on the conditions for a pullout, with the Prime Minister in the past saying troops would stay until the "job is done" and as long as the Iraqi Government wanted them to remain.

Mr Howard's comments came as US President George W. Bush acknowledged for the first time a parallel between the raging violence in Iraq and the Vietnam War. And British Prime Minister Tony Blair conceded, also for the first time, that British troops in Iraq could be a "provocation".

All three leaders acknowledged the graver threats facing coalition forces in Iraq, with Mr Blair suggesting Iraqi security forces could take control of the country by early 2008. ... <cont>

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20613099-601,00.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Oct, 2006 02:09 am
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/10/19/cartoon_2010_gallery__470x290.jpg
0 Replies
 
lezzles
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Oct, 2006 11:48 pm
I believe "Cry the Beloved Country" has already been used as a book title. How sad. A pox, a very painful, insidious, nasty pox on all of them!
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Oct, 2006 01:10 am
Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

How much more can we take?
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Oct, 2006 01:13 am
http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5280557,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Oct, 2006 01:24 am
Oh what the hell! Let's just wallow in our misery! We've got good reason!Sad :

Country of despair
Martin Flanagan
October 21, 2006/the AGE


http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/10/20/wbHOWARD_wideweb__470x269,0.jpg



When this was put to the Prime Minister he said it was not his opinion in a tone that suggested, as far as he was concerned, that was the end of the matter. And, lo and behold, it was the end of the matter. To my knowledge, no one asked the Prime Minister, "But upon what intelligence is your opinion based?", because from where I stand the answer looks suspiciously like, "No intelligence whatsoever".

I am arguing our country is afflicted with a blindness that needs urgent repair. .... <cont>

http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/country-of-despair/2006/10/20/1160851135982.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Beached As Bro - Discussion by dadpad
Oz election thread #3 - Rudd's Labour - Discussion by msolga
Australian music - Discussion by Wilso
Oz Election Thread #6 - Abbott's LNP - Discussion by hingehead
AUstralian Philosophers - Discussion by dadpad
Australia voting system - Discussion by fbaezer
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.8 seconds on 01/24/2025 at 05:29:02