-I-1-2-No-U- wrote:Frank Apisa wrote:-I-1-2-No-U- wrote:Frank Apisa wrote:-I-1-2-No-U- wrote:baz wrote:is hell here on earth or don't you care????
ACCORDING TO HEBREW SOURCES HELL IS NOTHING OTHER THAN THE GRAVE - GRAVEDOM TO BE PRECISE
IN ESSENCE EVERYONE WHO DIES IRRESPECTIVE OF THE METHOD WILL GO TO HELL OR GO TO GRAVEDOM
SO IN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION HELL IS ON PLANET EARTH FOR THIS IS WHERE EVERYONE DIES
So tell me...are Hebrew sources any more reliable than non-Hebrew sources on questions like this?
Are Hebrew guesses such that one can, as you just did, state definitively what the truth IS...with respect to questions of this sort?
TO PROVE WHICH SOURCE WAS MORE RELIABLE THAN ANY OTHER WOULD MEAN AN AUTHORITY THAT WAS IRREFUTABLE AND INFALLIBLE - TO DATE I AM NOT AWARE OF ANY TYPE OF HUMAN AUTHORITY THAT ENCOMPASSES THESE ATTRIBUTE OR HAS NEVER BEEN ACCUSED OF BEING UNRELIABLE
YOUR GUESS IS AS GOOD AS THE NEXT PERSONS GUESS
AS FAR AS I KNOW EARTH IS STILL THE PLACE WHERE EVERYONE DIES - YOU ARE FREE TO ACCEPT THIS AS FACT OR TRUTH - YOU ARE ALSO FREE TO REJECT THIS
Just as you are free to offer this information as a guess...or to offer it as though you are revealing some great truth.
You seem to be tending toward the latter.
But don't feel bad...lots of people make that mistake.
FOR IT TO BE A MISTAKE WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU KNOW WHAT THE TRUTH IS
Really!
Well re-read my comment...and you will see that it is directed toward the way you are presenting your information...rather than the information itself.
So it is quite possible I can comment on whether or not you are mistaken...without KNOWING what the truth is about the facts you seem to be pretending to KNOW.
In any case, any reasonable person would see my comment as a word play bit of irony based on what you had written...rather than a philosophical critique of what you wrote.
Quote:
YOUR COMMENTS WHICH ARE INTERPRETATIONS OF MY PREVIOUS COMMENTS CLEARLY VALIDATE THE COMMMENTS THAT I HAVE PREVIOUSLY STATED
You would have done much better to write: "So's yer ole man!" At least that would have made some sense.