Reply
Wed 27 Oct, 2004 05:41 pm
WMD and The True Basis of Operation Iraqi Freedom
The Anti-Americans at home and abroad, confronted with the unmitigated success of "Operation Iraqi Freedom" and the resultant liberation of the Iraqi people, refuse to admit that they were wrong in opposing the invasion. Instead, they repetitiously chant their mindless slogan, "Where are the Weapons of Mass Destruction?"
This slogan is mindless because it ignores the fact that Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) were in fact found both by U.N. inspectors on December 4, 2002 (mustard gas), and by the U.S. army during the first 15 days of the invasion in March and April, 2003. Some of the finds (e.g., of chemicals dumped in the Euphrates River, biochemical warheads, vials of biochemical substances,, etc.) were reported in the media at the time. In April and May, 2003 two [scrubbed down] mobil weapons laboratories were found. Third Infantry Division troops returning from Iraq reported that there were approximately ten confirmed findings of WMD. In addition, the troops also found links to al Qaeda and to the September 11 hijackers.
As to the larger caches, to date "the Kay team has been able to examine only 10 of the 130 known ammo depots in Iraq, some of which are as large as fifty square miles. It would be folly to say on the basis of a less-than-ten-percent sample whether WMD are to be found in the remainder." (Frank Gaffney, October 7, 2003.) Moreover, "In addition to the known depots, there are untold numbers of covert weapons caches around the country." (Ibid.) Inspectors have discovered "over two-dozen secret laboratories" for the production of biological and chemical weapons. (Ibid.) "Kay and his team have ?'discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002.'" (Colin Powell, October 7, 2003) Finally, "In addition to discovering work aimed at weaponizing various deadly diseases, the Iraq Survey Group received from an Iraqi scientist [a vial containing] ?'reference strains' for one of the most lethal substances known to man: Botulinum toxin. In short order, with the right equipment and growth material - items Saddam was able to acquire and retain since they were inherently ?'dual use' and could also be used for commercial purposes -- such strains could translate into large quantities of biological agents." (Frank Gaffney, October 7, 2003.) "Kay and his team also discovered documents and equipment [parts of a gas centrifuge system] in scientists' homes that would have been useful for resuming uranium enrichment efforts." (Colin Powell, October 7, 2003.)
The slogan was also mindless for the following reasons:
(1) all concerned (including former President Clinton and leading Democrats - in 1998, the entire Security Council, and the U.S. Senate) admit that Saddam not only had such weapons, but that he used them against the Kurds and the Iranians;
(2) Saddam had gone to great lengths to hide them in a country the size of France;
(3) such weapons can be as small as a suitcase atom bomb or a vial of biochemical material potent enough to wipe out an entire population; [e.g., a scientist's rose bush hid uranium enrichment equipment.]
"Dr. Kay has noted that all of Saddam Hussein's as yet unaccounted for WMD could be stored in a space the size of a two-car garage. According to former Clinton CIA Director R. James Woolsey, his entire suspected inventory of the biological agent anthrax would fill roughly half a standard semi's tractor trailer." (Frank Gaffney, October 7, 2003.)
(4) the appeasers were willing to give U.N. inspectors an infinite amount of time to find them, despite delays, concealment, bribes, and interference on the part of Saddam, in fact some twelve years of delays (1991-2003), including a three year period (1998-2001) when the U.N. inspectors were completely expelled;
(yet the coalition forces were expected to find them immediately even as the war continued to rage and bullets were flying);
(5) the delays which the appeasers demanded, purportedly to give U.N. inspectors "enough time to do their work" in fact gave Saddam additional time to hide the WMDs, to pass them on to Syria (also under a Baath nazi regime), starting in the mid-1990s (per captured scientist), or to al Qaeda terrorists;
(moreover, even were all existing WMD to be destroyed, given the infrastructure (laboratories, equipment, trained scientists, detailed plans) production could be resumed within six months should Saddam, himself the primary WMD, be restored to power.)
(6) under the U.N. inspection process, the burden of proof was on the Saddam regime, but now the appeasers have sought to shift the burden to coalition forces; and
(7) the need to find the WMDs was not by itself the cause of the invasion, although it was a contributing factor, lending greater urgency to the central reasons for the invasion listed below.
What then were the central reasons, any of which in itself was sufficient to justify the invasion of Iraq? It seems to me that they are seven-fold.
Reasons for Invading Iraq
1. To finish the war that Saddam had started in 1991 after his violation of the terms of surrender, thereby causing resumption of the previous state of hostilities.
2. To enforce the terms of U.N. resolutions, especially Security Council Resolution 1441.
3. To successfully prosecute the war on terror against a regime which sought to undermine our efforts against Al Qaeda, and which allies itself with, aids, finances, trains, and harbors terrorists, including al Qaeda.
4. To successfully prosecute the war on terror against a regime which itself participated in aggression against the U.S., including participation in the surprise attack of September 11, 2001.
5. To prevent another (and possibly worse) surprise attack (Sept. 11, 2001) on the U.S. and its allies.
6. To promote peace in the Middle East by securing it against Saddam's expansionist plans for a "Greater Iraq."
7. To liberate the people of Iraq from an oppressive and terrorist regime which committed fiendish tortures and massive genocide, on its own and neighboring populations.
Let us then examine these reasons in greater detail.
Reasons for Invading Iraq
1. To finish the war that Saddam had started in 1991 after his violation of the terms of surrender, thereby causing resumption of the previous state of hostilities.
a. In October, 1994, Saddam sent 60,000 Republican Guard troops towards the Kuwaiti border, but was deterred by the threat of U.S. troops;
b. Between September, 1977 and December, 1998, Saddam caused four international crises by refusing to comply with the terms of surrender (blocking, delaying, and undermining inspections, placing palaces off limits, and refusing to allow American inspectors);
c. In 1998 Saddam expelled the U.N. inspectors who were there to ensure compliance with the terms of surrender and that Saddam did not pose a threat to his neighbors and the free world.
d. Even after U.N. inspections were resumed in 2002, Saddam interfered with the process by concealing and moving weapons and delaying and impeding inspections and interviews with Iraqi scientists.
2. To enforce the terms of U.N. resolutions, especially Security Council Resolution 1441.
a. Unless the U.N. can enforce its resolutions, they are not worth the paper upon which they are written.
b. Saddam's regime engaged in 12 years of noncompliance with 17 U.N. resolutions.
c. The resolutions required disarmament as to offensive weaponry;
d. the burden of proof as to compliance was necessarily on the Saddam regime, for the following reasons:
(1) past violations and evasion;
(2) the 1998 exclusion of inspectors resulting in a period in which weapons could easily be concealed;
(3) a country the size of California, too large to provide any assurance that prohibited weapons had been destroyed;
(4) prohibited weapons (e.g., vials of biochemical substances, suitcase atom bombs) could be extremely small and easily hidden.
e. Saddam engaged in "material breaches" of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441.
(1) fired missiles at U.S. planes patrolling the no-fly zones (an outright act of aggression);
(2) failed to account for all biochemical substances (VX gas (3.9 tons), mustard gas, nerve gas (4 tons), anthrax (8.5 tons), sarin gas, botulism, etc.) that UN inspectors had found prior to their 1998 exclusion;
(3) interfered with UN interviews of Iraqi scientists;
(4) covered up possession of banned intermediate range missiles (Scuds, al-Samoud II, etc.).
(5) delayed U.N. inspections at suspect sites while contents were removed by the back door (revealed by satellite photos)
3. To successfully prosecute the war on terror against a regime which sought to undermine our efforts against Al Qaeda, and which allies itself with, aids, finances, trains, and harbors terrorists, including al qaeda.
a. during the Afghanistan war, Saddam sought to undermine our alliance with nearby Arabic and Islamic countries (e.g., Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan) against Al Qaeda. His strategem was to finance the recruitment of Palestinian children to blow themselves up in Israel in order to cause Israel to retaliate and thereby unify Arabs and Moslems against Israel's ally America;
b. like the Taliban regime which was targeted because it harbored the Al Qaeda terrorists, the Saddam regime similarly harbored Al Qaeda terrorists (in Ansar al Islam, Baghdad, and Salmon Pak);
c. in the greater context of the war against terror, the Saddam regime financed and trained terrorists of various terrorist organizations, e.g., Hamas and Al Qaeda.
4. To successfully prosecute the war on terror against a regime which itself participated in aggression against the U.S., including participation in the surprise attack of September 11, 2001.
a. After the Persian Gulf war, Saddam Hussein viewed his expulsion from Kuwait as only a temporary set-back in a continuing war with America; in 1991 his news agency carried the threat that "the American arena will not be excluded from the operations and explosions of the Arab and Muslim mujahedin and all the honest strugglers in the world";
b. On Friday, February 26, 1993, the second anniversary of the U.S. liberation of Kuwait, two Iraqi agents Ramzi Yousef (the mastermind) and Abdul Rahman Yasin, along with others, organized the first attack (by bombing) of the World Trade Center, the symbol of world capitalism and of the U.S. economy;
c. in April, 1993 the Saddam regime attempted to use a car bomb to assassinate former President George Herbert Walker Bush, the man who had foiled his 1991 expansionist ambitions, during the latter's visit to Kuwait;
d. The Saddam regime appears to have participated in the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City;
(1) Ramzi Yousef (the mastermind of the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center) was among former Iraqi soldiers who met with Terry Nichols in the Phillipines to provide the latter with bomb-making expertise;
(2) Hussain Hashem Al Hussaini, a Palestinian with a tatoo proclaiming past service in Saddam's Republican Guard, appears to have been the "John Doe # 2" seen in the company of confessed bomber Timothy McVeigh a few days before the attack.
e. the Saddam regime participated in the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon;
(1) Saddam trained the al Qaeda terrorists in the art of hijacking planes at Salman Pak using a Boeing 707 plane fusilage later found by U.S. troops, telling the recruits that the targets were U.S. installations around the world;
(2) Saddam maintained contacts (through Iraqi intelligence) with at least 4 of the September 11 hijack conspirators, including their leader Mohammed Atta (the others being Marwan al-Shehri, Ziad Jarrah, and Yusuf Galan);
(3) In early September, 2001, shortly before the September 11 attacks, Saddam placed his troops on the highest state of alert and with his family retreated into heavily fortified bunkers in Tikrit, evidently fearing retaliation for the imminent attack on the U.S.;
(4) In the days following September 11, anthrax letters were mailed, anthrax being a bioweapon used by Saddam;
(5) In November, 2001, bin Ladin was proclaimed Iraq's "Man of the Year," but an official poem gave Saddam the credit for the attack by the four hijacked planes;
(6) During Operation Iraqi Freedom, troops found murals in Nasiriya (by marines on March 26, 2003) and in Baghdad (by the Third Infantry on April 13, 2003) at Iraqi military centers depicting the World Trade Center at the awful moment of attack, the former showing Iraqi planes as the perpetrators and the latter depicting Saddam celebrating along side of the burning twin towers;
d. on October 28, 2002, the al-Zarqawi network, a Baghdad-based al-Qaida cell, allied to Saddam, assassinated Laurence Foley, a U.S. diplomat in Jordan;
e. even during the U.N. inspections, before the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Saddam regime continuously attacked U.S. planes monitoring the "no-fly" zones.
5. To prevent another (and possibly worse) surprise attack (Sept. 11, 2001) on the U.S. and its allies.
a. Available intelligence made it clear that al Qaeda was aggressively searching for weapons of mass destruction such as a "dirty bomb" which uses conventional explosives to spew radioactive material
b. Furthermore, it was obvious to all concerned that the one country that might be tempted to make weapons of mass destruction available to terrorist groups was Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
(1) Since the 1970s when Saddam first emerged as the strongman of the Middle East, he had devoted enormous resources towards acquiring chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons;
(2) Saddam had a record of using such weapons against his own people in Kurdistan in 1998, and against Iranians;
(3) Saddam had a record of working with terrorist groups, such as Hamas in Israel and al Qaeda in the Sudan.
c. In sum, Saddam's willingness to use his nonconventional weapons arsenal coupled with Al Qaeda's desperation to acquire such weapons required removal of the threat posed by Saddam.
6. To promote peace in the Middle East by securing it against Saddam's expansionist plans for a "Greater Iraq."
a. In July 1968 Saddam was part of a Baath (i.e., National Socialist) party military coup in Iraq; in July, 1979, Saddam purged his Baath party rivals and became Iraq's unqualified dictator; Saddam saw himself as a modern day Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian king who conquered Jerusalem in 587 B.C., destroyed the Jewish Temple, and forced the Jews into exile by the rivers of Babylon;
b. A 1990 letter written by Saddam's son Uday reveals "his father's plans to create a greater Iraq that includes Kuwait, Palestine and Arabstan, a region of Iran historically controlled by Baghdad." (Time Magazine, 4/13/03.) The term "Palestine" has been applied to both the territory of present-day Israel and Jordan (the latter being ruled by the Hashemite family which once ruled both Jordan and Iraq);
c. A painting on display in Baghdad showed Saddam's prospective "liberation" of Jerusalem;
d. Pursuant to his "Arabstan" ambition, in September, 1980, Saddam launched an eight year war against neighboring Iran, resulting in the death of one million people and the ruin of both economies;
e. In 1991 Saddam invaded Kuwait and then launched an attack on Saudi Arabia before being pushed back by coalition forces; Scuds were fired at both Saudi Arabia and Israel;
f. In October, 1994, Saddam sent 60,000 Republican Guard troops towards the Kuwaiti border, but was deterred by the threat of U.S. troops;
g. Saddam proceeded to build up his troops and an arsenal of weaponry disproportionate to those in other Middle Eastern countries;
h. Saddam has financed homicide bombings in Israel by rewarding Palestinian families who encourage their children to blow themselves up in order to kill Israeli civilians.
7. To liberate the people of Iraq from an oppressive and terrorist regime which committed fiendish tortures and massive genocide, on its own and neighboring populations.
a. As summarized by Human Rights Watch, "In addition to abuses particularly aimed at the Kurds and Shi'a Muslims, the Iraqi people under Saddam Hussein have suffered a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights, including political imprisonment, torture, and summary and arbitrary executions. In addition, a ubiquitous network of sequrity services and informants has suppressed independent civilian institutions and terrorized the Iraqi population into virtual silence. Torture techniques have included hangings, beatings, rape, and burning suspects alive. Thousands of Iraqi detainees have died under torture."
b. According to that same source, "[t]here have also been a staggering number of 'disappearances' - believed to range between 250,000 - 290,000. In addition to the 50,000 - 70,000 Shi'a cases described above, and the 100,000 Kurdish victims," there have been other "disappearances."
c. During Saddam's ongoing "Arabization" campaign (1968-1977 and after the Gulf War), ethnic minorities, including over 120,000 Kurds, Turcomans and Assyrians were forcibly expelled from their homes in the oil-rich region of Kirkuk and neighboring towns and villages. Arab families were brought in from southern Iraq and resettled in the lands and homes of those evicted.
d. As to the Kurds, "between 1977 and 1987, some 4,500 - 5,000 Kurdish villages were systematically destroyed and their inhabitants forcibly removed and made to live in 'resettlement camps.'" During the "Anfal" campaign, "more than 100,000 Kurds, mostly men and boys, were trucked to remote sites and executed." Use of chemical weapons against the Kurds commenced in the spring of 1987 and reached a peak in March, 1988, some 3,200 - 5,000 Kurds being murdered in gas (hydrogen cyanide) attacks in the town of Halabja alone;
e. During the onset of the Iran-Iraq war (1980-1988), thousands of Shi'a Muslims were arrested. Many of these were tortured and executed while others disappeared. In addition over half a million Shi'a were expelled to Iran, except for 50,000 - 70,000 men and boys who were imprisoned indefinitely, in the most part unaccounted for.
f. Starting in 1983-1984, during the Iran-Iraq war, Saddam made extensive use of chemical weapons. Mustard gas and the nerve agents tubun and sarin were used to kill some 20,000 Iranians.
g. In 1990-1991, Iraq occupied Kuwait, systematically committing gross human rights abuses against the people of Kuwait. Hundreds were killed, thousands detained, and there were countless acts of rape, assault, theft, torture, summary executions, and "disappearances."
h. After the Gulf War, thousands of Shi'a were imprisoned, disappeared, or were summarily executed. Tens of thousands of Shiites in the southeast sought precarious shelter in remote areas of the marshes only to be shelled and attacked by Saddam's military. Many fled into Iran while others were displaced.
i. The foregoing represssion, terror, torture, genocides, war crimes, and crimes against humanity could have been committed against any human being unfortunate enough to be targeted by or live under such a regime, including citizens of the United States. It follows that regime change is fully justified to replace the unelected Baath (National Socialist) Party regime which ruled by terror with a democratic regime which serves the people of Iraq.
Each of these seven reasons for the invasion have been set forth at one time or another. To the anti-Americans and the appeasers we ask, "Have you forgotten?"
Iraqi Documents Show Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
Scott Wheeler, CNSNews.com
Monday, Oct. 4, 2004
Iraqi intelligence documents, confiscated by U.S. forces and obtained by CNSNews.com, show numerous efforts by Saddam Hussein's regime to work with some of the world's most notorious terror organizations, including al-Qaida, to target Americans.
The documents demonstrate that Saddam's government possessed mustard gas and anthrax, both considered weapons of mass destruction, in the summer of 2000, during the period in which United Nations weapons inspectors were not present in Iraq. And the papers show that Iraq trained dozens of terrorists inside its borders.
Story Continues Below
One of the Iraqi memos contains an order from Saddam for his intelligence service to support terrorist attacks against Americans in Somalia. The memo was written nine months before U.S. Army Rangers were ambushed in Mogadishu by forces loyal to a warlord with alleged ties to al-Qaida.
Other memos provide a list of terrorist groups with whom Iraq had relationships and considered available for terror operations against the United States.
Among the organizations mentioned are those affiliated with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Ayman al-Zawahiri, two of the world's most wanted terrorists. Zarqawi is believed responsible for the kidnapping and beheading of several American civilians in Iraq and claimed blame for a series of deadly bombings in Iraq Sept. 30. Al-Zawahiri is the top lieutenant of al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden, allegedly helped plan the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist strikes on the U.S., and is believed to be the voice on an audio tape broadcast by Al-Jazeera television Oct. 1, calling for attacks on U.S. and British interests everywhere.
The Source
A senior government official who is not a political appointee provided CNSNews.com with copies of the 42 pages of Iraqi Intelligence Service documents. The originals, some of which were hand-written and others typed, are in Arabic. CNSNews.com had the papers translated into English by two individuals separately and independent of each other.
There are no handwriting samples to which the documents can be compared for forensic analysis and authentication. However, three other experts - a former weapons inspector with the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), a retired CIA counter-terrorism official with vast experience dealing with Iraq, and a former advisor to then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton on Iraq - were asked to analyze the documents. All said they comport with the format, style and content of other Iraqi documents from that era known to be genuine.
Laurie Mylroie, who wrote the book "Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America," and advised Bill Clinton on Iraq during the 1992 presidential campaign, told CNSNews.com that the papers represented "the most complete set of documents relating Iraq to terrorism, including Islamic terrorism" against the U.S.
Mylroie has long maintained that Iraq was a state sponsor of terrorism against the United States. The documents obtained by CNSNews.com, she said, include "correspondence back and forth between Saddam's office and Iraqi Mukhabarat [intelligence agency]. They make sense. This is what one would think Saddam was doing at the time."
Bruce Tefft, a retired CIA official who specialized in counter-terrorism and had extensive experience dealing with Iraq, said that "based on available, unclassified and open source information, the details in these documents are accurate ..."
The former UNSCOM inspector zeroed in on the signatures on the documents and "the names of some of the people who sign off on these things.
"This is fairly typical of that time era. [The Iraqis] were meticulous record keepers," added the former U.N. official, who spoke with CNSNews.com on the condition of anonymity.
The senior government official, who furnished the documents to CNSNews.com, said the papers answer "whether or not Iraq was a state sponsor of Islamic terrorism against the United States. It also answers whether or not Iraq had an ongoing biological warfare project continuing through the period when the UNSCOM inspections ended."
Presidential Campaign
The presidential campaign is currently dominated by debate over whether Saddam procured weapons of mass destruction and whether his government sponsored terrorism aimed at Americans before the U.S. invaded Iraq last year. Democrat nominee Sen. John Kerry has repeatedly rejected that possibility and criticized President Bush for needlessly invading Iraq.
"[Bush's] two main rationales - weapons of mass destruction and the al-Qaida/September 11 connection - have been proved false ... by the president's own weapons inspectors ... and by the 9/11 commission," Kerry told an audience at New York University on Sept. 20.
The Senate Intelligence Committee's probe of the 9/11 intelligence failures also could not produce any definitive links between Saddam's government and 9/11. And United Nations as well as U.S. weapons inspectors in Iraq have been unable to find the biological and chemical weapons Saddam was suspected of possessing.
But the documents obtained by CNSNews.com shed new light on the controversy.
They detail the Iraqi regime's purchase of five kilograms of mustard gas on Aug. 21, 2000 and three vials of malignant pustule, another term for anthrax, on Sept. 6, 2000. The purchase order for the mustard gas includes gas masks, filters and rubber gloves. The order for the anthrax includes sterilization and decontamination equipment.
The documents show that Iraqi intelligence received the mustard gas and anthrax from "Saddam's company," which Tefft said was probably a reference to Saddam General Establishment, "a complex of factories involved with, amongst other things, precision optics, missile, and artillery fabrication."
"Sa'ad's general company" is listed on the Iraqi documents as the supplier of the sterilization and decontamination equipment that accompanied the anthrax vials. Tefft believes this is a reference to the Salah Al-Din State Establishment, also involved in missile construction.
Jaber Ibn Hayan General Co. is listed as the supplier of the safety equipment that accompanied the mustard gas order. Tefft described the company as "a 'turn-key' project built by Romania, designed to produce protective CW [conventional warfare] and BW [biological warfare] equipment [gas masks and protective clothing]."
"Iraq had an ongoing biological warfare project continuing through the period when the UNSCOM inspections ended," the senior government official and source of the documents said. "This should cause us to redouble our efforts to find the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction programs."
'Hunt the Americans'
The first of the 42 pages of Iraqi documents is dated Jan. 18, 1993, approximately two years after American troops defeated Saddam's army in the first Persian Gulf War. The memo includes Saddam's directive that "the party should move to hunt the Americans who are on Arabian land, especially in Somalia, by using Arabian elements ..."
On Oct. 3, 1993, less than nine months after that Iraqi memo was written, American soldiers were ambushed in Mogadishu, Somalia by forces loyal to Somali warlord Mohammed Farah Aidid, an alleged associate of Osama bin Laden. Eighteen Americans were killed and 84 wounded during a 17-hour firefight that followed the ambush in which Aidid's followers used civilians as decoys.
An 11-page Iraqi memo, dated Jan. 25, 1993, lists Palestinian, Sudanese and Asian terrorist organizations and the relationships Iraq had with each of them. Of particular importance, Tefft said, are the relationships Iraq had already developed or was in the process of developing with groups and individuals affiliated with al-Qaida, such as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Ayman al-Zawahiri. The U.S. is offering rewards of up to $25 million for each man's capture.
The documents describe Al-Jehad wa'l Tajdeed as "a secret Palestinian organization" founded after the first Persian Gulf War that "believes in armed struggle against U.S. and western interests." The leaders of the group, according to the Iraqi memo, were stationed in Jordan in 1993, and when one of those leaders visited Iraq in November 1992, he "showed the readiness of his organization to execute operations against U.S. interests at any time."
Tefft believes the Tajdeed group likely included al-Zarqawi, whom Teft described as "our current terrorist nemesis" in Iraq, "a Palestinian on a Jordanian passport who was with al-Qaida and bin Laden in Afghanistan prior to this period [1993]."
Tajdeed, which means Islamic Renewal, "has a Web site that posts Zarqawi's speeches, messages, claims of assassinations and beheading videos," Tefft told CNSNews.com. "The apparent linkages are too close to be accidental" and might "be one of the first operational contacts between an al-Qaida group and Iraq."
Tefft said the documents, all of which the Iraqi Intelligence Service labeled "Top secret, personal and urgent," showed several links between Saddam's government and terror groups dedicated not only to targeting America but also U.S. allies such as Egypt and Israel.
The same 11-page memo refers to the "re-opening of the relationship" with Al-Jehad al-Islamy, which is described as "the most violent in Egypt," responsible for the 1981 assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. The documents go on to describe a Dec. 14, 1990 meeting between Iraqi intelligence officials and a representative of Al-Jehad al-Islamy, that ended in an agreement "to move against [the] Egyptian regime by doing martyr operations on conditions that we should secure the finance, training and equipments."
Al-Zawahiri was one of the leaders of Jehad al-Islamy, also known as Egyptian Islamic Group, and participated in the assassination of Sadat, Tefft said. "Iraq's contact with the Egyptian Islamic Group is another operational contact between Iraq and al-Qaida," he added.
One of the Asian groups listed on the Iraqi intelligence memo is J.U.I., also known as Islamic Clerks Society. The group is led by Mawlana Fadhel al-Rahman, whom Tefft said is "an al-Qaida member and co-signed Osama bin Laden's 1998 fatwa (religious ruling) to kill Americans." The Iraqi memo from 1993 states that J.U.I.'s secretary general "has a good relationship with our system since 1981 and he is ready for any mission." Tefft said the memo shows "another direct Iraq link to an al-Qaida group."
Iraq had also maintained a relationship with the Afghani Islamist party since 1989, according to the memo. The "relationship was improved and became directly between the leader, Hekmatyar and Iraq," it states, referring to Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, an Afghani warlord who fought against the Soviet Union and current al-Qaida ally, according to Tefft.
Last year, American authorities in Afghanistan ranked Hekmatyar third on their most wanted list, behind only bin Laden and former Taliban leader Mullah Omar. Hekmatyar represents "another Iraqi link to an al-Qaida group," Tefft said.
The Iraqi intelligence documents also refer to terrorist groups previously believed to have had links with Saddam Hussein. They include Palestine Liberation Front, a group dedicated to attacking Israel, and according to the Iraqi memo, one with "an office in Baghdad."
Abu Nidal
The Abu Nidal group, suspected by the CIA of having acted as surrogates for Iraqi terrorist attacks, is also mentioned.
"The movement believes in political violence and assassinations," the 1993 Iraqi memo states in reference to the Abu Nidal organization. "We have relationships with them since 1973. Currently, they have a representative in the country. Monthly helps are given to them - 20 thousand dinars - in addition to other supports," the memo explains. (See Saddam's Connections to Palestinian Terror Groups)
Iraq not only built and maintained relationships with terrorist groups, the documents show it appears to have trained terrorists as well. Ninety-two individuals from various Middle Eastern countries are listed on the papers.
Many are described as having "finished the course at M14," a reference to an Iraqi intelligence agency, and to having "participated in Umm El-Ma'arek," the Iraqi response to the U.S. invasion in 1991. The author of the list notes that approximately half of the individuals "all got trained inside the 'martyr act camp' that belonged to our directorate."
The former UNSCOM weapons inspector who was asked to analyze the documents believes it's clear that the Iraqis "were training people there in assassination and suicide bombing techniques ... including non-Iraqis."
Bush Administration Likely Unaware of Documents
The senior government official and source of the Iraqi intelligence memos, explained that the reason the documents had not been made public before now was that the government has "thousands and thousands of documents waiting to be translated.
"It is unlikely they even know this exists," the source added.
The government official also explained that the motivation for leaking the documents "is strictly national security and helping with the war on terrorism by focusing this country's attention on facts and away from political posturing."
"This is too important to let it get caught up in the political process," the source told CNSNews.com.
To protect against the Iraqi intelligence documents being altered or misrepresented elsewhere on the Internet, CNSNews.com has decided to publish only the first of the 42 pages in Arabic, along with the English translation. Portions of some of the other memos in translated form are also being published to accompany this report. Credentialed journalists and counter-terrorism experts seeking to view the 42 pages of Arabic documents or to challenge their authenticity may make arrangements to do so at CNSNews.com's headquarters in Alexandria, Va.
Copyright CNSNews.com
Despite supposed non-existence . . .
Nuclear assets 'vanish' in Iraq
BBC News
Monday, October 11, 2004
Equipment and materials that could be used to make nuclear arms have been vanishing in Iraq since the invasion, the United Nations has warned.
Satellite images show entire buildings have been dismantled without any record being made, said Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog.
Iraq's US-backed leaders have not reported to the UN on the state of nuclear plants despite a duty to do so.
But they have asked the UN to help sell off unwanted nuclear material.
"The disappearance of such equipment and materials may be of proliferation significance" per Muhamed ElBaradei
Inspectors from Mr ElBaradei's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), who established that Saddam Hussein had abandoned any nuclear weapons programme before the war, have not been allowed to move about Iraq freely by the US.
Apart from a couple of limited checks on the main nuclear facility at Tuwaitha last June after reports of looting - and with no teams now on the ground - the IAEA has to rely on satellite imagery and other sources.
In a letter to the UN Security Council, Mr ElBaradei said buildings related to Iraq's previous nuclear programme appeared to have been systematically dismantled and equipment and material removed.
"The disappearance of such equipment and materials may be of proliferation significance," the IAEA director general warned.
No reports
Sensitive technology such as rocket engines has turned up for sale abroad, Mr ElBaradei said.
However, high-precision "dual-use" items including milling machines and electron beam welders appear to have disappeared, as has material such as high-strength aluminium.
Mr ElBaradei called on any state with information on the location of such items to inform his agency.
The US removed nearly two tonnes of low-enriched uranium from Iraq earlier this year. The IAEA has verified that 550 tonnes of nuclear material still remain at Tuwaitha.
Iraq, the agency says, has asked for help to sell the nuclear material and in dismantling and decontaminating former nuclear facilities.
Mr ElBaradei reminded the Security Council that Iraq was still obliged to "declare semi-annually changes that have occurred or are foreseen at sites deemed relevant" by the IAEA.
However, since March 2003 "the agency has received no such notifications or declarations from any state", he said.
Last week, a report from chief US weapons inspector Charles Duelfer concluded that Saddam Hussein had stopped trying to build weapons of mass destruction following the 1991 Gulf War.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/3735224.stm
Published: 2004/10/11 23:49:10 GMT
© BBC MMIV
Sunday, Oct. 3, 2004 10:08 a.m. EDT
Condi: Saddam Prepared to Restart Nuke Program
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice said Sunday that Saddam Hussein was prepared to restart his nuclear weapons program on a moment's notice, rebutting claims by Sen. John Kerry during Thursday night's presidential debate that Iraq posed no nuclear threat.
"One of the heads of his nuclear program, Mr. Obeidi, said in the New York Times just a few days ago that Saddam Hussein could have restarted his nuclear program at the snap of a finger," Rice told ABC's "This Week."
Story Continues Below
Last week Dr. Mahdi Obeidi, who was in charge of Saddam's uranium enrichment operation, told Fox News Channel's Sean Hannity that he turned over blueprints for centrifuges that Saddam wanted built to U.S. weapons inspectors after the war.
Obeidi worked at the al Tuwaitha nuclear weapons facility south of Baghdad, where 500 tons of yellowcake uranium ore were stored for weapons development.
Asked if he was working to obtain a nuclear bomb for Saddam "well into the late 1990s," Obeidi told Hannity, "I was."
The Iraqi nuclear scientist details his efforts to produce nuclear weapons for Iraq in his new book, "The Bomb in My Garden."
Dr. Rice cited Obeidi's account to back up the assessment of what she described as "the intelligence community as a whole," which had determined that aluminum tubes uncovered in Iraq were "certainly suitable for and likely intended for his nuclear weapons program."
"The director of central intelligence believed that these tubes were part of a reconstituted nuclear weapons program," Rice told ABC. "I would point out that the Department of Energy report also joined in the assessment that Saddam Hussein was reconstituting his nuclear weapons program."
Dr. Rice said those assessments followed other evidence, which included the importation into Iraq of balancing equipment suitable for nuclear weapons development and the fact that Iraq's nuclear weapons scientists, like Dr. Obeidi, were still in place.
dlowan wrote:Lol - but it is such a good question - where are the weapons of mass destruction which formed the excuse for the US (and its allies) to invade another country?
Perhaps if you could answer it without wriggling and ducking and weaving like worms on hooks we would stop asking.
here's a clue.
they didn't exist.
even Bush has had to admit that.
he just hasn't made the next step - which is to say "I was wrong".
I won't be holding my breath though. Don't think it's in the stunningly small vocab....
Now don't be silly. Of course Saddam had WMD. The question is what did he do with them? Did he destroy all of them, or did he haul them to a place for safekeeping? And where might that place be?
Some of us aren't content to believe Saddam was a nice guy. We don't give him the benefit of the doubt that: (a) he wouldn't give WMD or secrets of WMD to the terrorists which he provided support to, or (b) he didn't have WMD, simply because they've not been found. Giving Saddam the benefit of the doubt seems to me to be a singularly bad idea. The opposite seems to be the better course of action: Assume Saddam was lying, and understand that he was a despicable murderous cretin that hated the United States. Then act accordingly. There is evil in this world, and notwithstanding the soft fuzzy feeling we might get thinking people are basically good, some people are evil. Thus you must forgive me if I'm skeptical of Saddam's good intentions.
Lol - I am struck by the simplistic thinking you show - ie believing the evidence of my own research and the American government's own reports that there were no WMD= (in your eyes)thinking America's ex-stooge Saddam is a nice guy.
I do not think in simplistic binary terms.
I both think Saddam was a very nasty guy, and that the excuses used for the war were manifestly untrue, and the war a damaging mistake.
I believe, on very good evidence, (see your own government report that even Bush seems to believe) , that he got rid of what he had after Gulf War I.
I suggest you come up with mighty good evidence, not just "I think so and you're an idiot if you disagree with me"- which is what you have come up with so far - if you are going to contest this.
Oh - if you DO have good evidence, why not turn it over to your government - they seem to be having lots of trouble getting any.
dlowan wrote:I believe, on very good evidence, (see your own government report that even Bush seems to believe) , that he got rid of what he had after Gulf War I.
I suggest you come up with mighty good evidence, not just "I think so and you're an idiot if you disagree with me"- which is what you have come up with so far - if you are going to contest this.
Oh - if you DO have good evidence, why not turn it over to your government - they seem to be having lots of trouble getting any.
Did I call you an idiot?
You should give me a little more credit than you are. I don't tend to call someone an "idiot" just because they have an opinion that's different than mine. Unlike some on this board who shall remain nameless.
I've actually argued with someone about whether Saddam EVER had WMD. I'm glad I don't have to convince you of that. Similarly, you don't need to convince me of the existence of the government report that indicated Saddam had destroyed his WMD post-Gulf War I, but retained the capabilities to reconstitute his weapons programs within days/months.
And while I would like to believe that was the case (and it very well may be), I've also seen reports that large convoys of trucks were seen by surveillance satellites carrying something into Syria. I'm very interested to find out what that was. Aren't you?
"Now don't be silly. Of course Saddam had WMD"
You're right - you called me silly - a little softer than idiot, to be sure - but I think your words strongly connected in most definitions.
"but retained the capabilities to reconstitute his weapons programs within days/months."
More like years in my opinion. Perhaps some in months - perhaps we need to define mass.
"I've also seen reports that large convoys of trucks were seen by surveillance satellites carrying something into Syria. I'm very interested to find out what that was. Aren't you? "
Hmmm - in the mess of misinformation leading up top this war, so many things have been labelled "evidence" of WMD, that have not been, thta I will now view all these vague sightings and rumours of maybe sightings with many grains of salt, until I see clear, unequivocal evidence.
Won't you?
Quote:"Now don't be silly. Of course Saddam had WMD"
You're right - you called me silly - a little softer than idiot, to be sure - but I think your words strongly connected in most definitions.
I'm such a nice guy, I didn't even call you silly. I told you
not to be silly. And in a very polite, yet ever-so-slightly scolding manner.
Quote:"but retained the capabilities to reconstitute his weapons programs within days/months."
More like years in my opinion. Perhaps some in months - perhaps we need to define mass.
Going strictly off memory, I believe the same report you are referring to put the schedule for reconstituting his weapons programs at 30 days for chemical and maybe 6-8 months for biological weapons. The "years" time-frame might be accurate for nuclear weapons.
Quote:"I've also seen reports that large convoys of trucks were seen by surveillance satellites carrying something into Syria. I'm very interested to find out what that was. Aren't you? "
Hmmm - in the mess of misinformation leading up top this war, so many things have been labelled "evidence" of WMD, that have not been, thta I will now view all these vague sightings and rumours of maybe sightings with many grains of salt, until I see clear, unequivocal evidence.
Won't you?
Yes, I have many grains of salt.