@Olivier5,
Quote:No, that wasn't my answer, but I'm glad you liked it.
In response to me stating that the collapses of the WTCs occurred in a manner that defied the laws of physics, you said, "
If that were true, it would follow that we should review our understanding of the laws of physics, because our theories and models would have been proven wrong on that fateful day." You were implying that the WTCs collapsed in a manner consistent with the laws of physics--specifically, the law of conservation of energy. They did not.
In response to camlok saying that Newton is doing somersaults in his grave, as is Richard Feynman, Albert Einstein . . ., you said, "
When the old laws of physics are broken by facts, new laws of physics are made. Remember Galileo?"
So, yes, your answer to how the energy required to pulverize everything in the building below the impact zone, and the energy required to produce the explosive lateral ejections--as seen in photos and videos of the collapses--still allowed for enough reserve energy to allow for a virtually freefall descent through the course of most resistance is that the law of conservation of energy was wrong, and that what happened to the WTC Towers is what showed us that the old laws were wrong.
