Reply
Tue 19 Oct, 2004 06:07 am
From the WSJ editorial page.
At his party's convention in Boston, Mr. Kerry pledged, "As President, I will not privatize Social Security." OK, fine. But as President, what would he do to prevent a fiscal catastrophe? Isn't this part of a President's job description?
He certainly hasn't left himself much room for leadership. His campaign Web site says: "As president, John Kerry will not raise Social Security taxes, raise the retirement age, cut benefits for people that rely on Social Security or privatize Social Security." These promises simply can't all be kept. There is a choice to be made.
Mr. Bush is at least proposing one way to address the problem that is open to public scrutiny and debate. Senator Kerry refuses to choose, assures us that with "minor changes" it will all work out somehow, and demonizes his opponent for having a plan. These are the scare tactics of a desperate candidate, and we hope the Bush campaign doesn't let him get away with it.
Explain the privitization program that Bush is proposing. How will it work?
Larry434 wrote:
Our elected representatives will work out those details in negotiations.[/color]
And they wont do such, when Kerry becomes president
Walter Hinteler wrote:Larry434 wrote:
Our elected representatives will work out those details in negotiations.[/color]
And they wont do such, when Kerry becomes president 
Based on what Kerry is quoted as saying here, he would veto any partial privatization of SS.
But then, he has a lifelong record of flipflopping, so maybe they will.[/color]
Larry434 wrote:squinney wrote:Explain the privitization program that Bush is proposing. How will it work?
As I understand it, folks will have the option to invest part of their money that is taken for SS into a private account. The details of how much, or how it will affect the viability of the current SS program, I do not know.
Our elected representatives will work out those details in negotiations.
Since the money needed to pay current benefits comes from the money paid into the system by current workers...and since the baby boomers are now coming onto the rolls...and since allowing current workers to "invest" in "private accounts"...
...the scheme proposed by George Bush is such a bad idea...I fail to see how anyone except a deluded ideologue could possibly see it as "addressing the problem."
It isn't addressing the problem.
It is more like pretending we will mine gold on Ganymede and use the proceeds to pay benefits.
As for the comment that Kerry will veto any attempts to partially privatize Social Security...well...
...any president who is not a moron most assuredly better veto any such idiotic notion.
I'm not suprised the Wall Street journal would support having part of peoples social security collected by the government and invested by the government into the Wall Street coffers.
The problem I have with it is that it is being promoted as "ownership." It is promoted as people getting to have a choice of what to do with their own money.
Well, then don't take it out of my check automatically on payday. Let me invest on my own if you trust me to be responsible with my own money! But, that is not what is being proposed.
Who do you suppose will be the beneficiaries of these investments? Who will the government choose to buy stocks in with our money?
It might sound good in sound bites, but the details are sketchy and I have found the presentation of the proposal to be misleading.
squinney wrote:
Well, then don't take it out of my check automatically on payday. Let me invest on my own if you trust me to be responsible with my own money! But, that is not what is being proposed.
Who do you suppose will be the beneficiaries of these investments? Who will the government choose to buy stocks in with our money?
It might sound good in sound bites, but the details are sketchy and I have found the presentation of the proposal to be misleading.
EXCELLANT POINT!!! I recently heard that in order to create the individuals "seperate account", BILLIONS of dollars would need to go into the "general account" to offset the loss of those funds.
Kerry has said what he WON"T do, but not what he WILL do to fix the problem. GW has said what he will do but has not spoken to HOW it will fix the shortfall.
Neither are addressing the waste in the system and how billions of our tax dollars are spent on the unwilling.
Then find out what is in their portfolio. I'll keep my 15% and CHOOSE whether or not I want to invest the same way.
Here's the Bush Plan. If you understand it, please explain. To me it looks like SS will be withheld and invested, if one chooses, into an already existing employer provided account. What I don't see is where self-employed, part time workers and those who do not have a 401k through employers will have an option.
Specifics on the The President's Plan to Strengthen Retirement Security
Expanding Ownership of Retirement Assets: The tax relief legislation signed into law by the President provided almost $50 billion dollars of tax relief over the next ten years to strengthen retirement security. This landmark legislation raised the contribution limits for IRA and 401(k) accounts, allowed for additional "catch up" contributions for workers aged 50 and over, and speeded up the vesting process for employer contributions to 401(k) accounts. The President has also proposed to create, for the first time, the right for every worker to own assets within the Social Security system through personal accounts.
Ensuring Freedom of Choice: The President's proposal would ensure that workers who have participated in 401(k) plans for three years are given the freedom to choose where to invest their retirement savings. The President has also proposed that choice be a feature of Social Security itself, allowing individuals to voluntarily invest a portion of their Social Security taxes in personal retirement accounts.
Creating a Society of Stakeholders: President Bush supports the creation of Individual Development Accounts, providing savings matches for low-income Americans to accounts that would grow tax-free. The President's Social Security framework would also give all wage earners the opportunity to invest in financial assets, an opportunity that only half of Americans can now afford.
Providing for Equal Treatment of Senior Executives and Rank and File Employees: The President's pension reform proposals would provide for equality of opportunity between senior executives and wage owners, precluding senior executives from selling company stock during times when workers are unable to do so.
Minimizing Risk through Diversification: The President's proposals would ensure that workers can sell company stock and diversify into other investment options, minimizing their risk. In order to safely prepare for retirement, it is essential to provide workers with the opportunity not to have all of their "eggs in one basket." The President's Social Security framework would also allow participants to diversify their investments and minimize risks, so that the security of their Social Security benefits can be protected against political manipulation and market swings.
Strengthening Women's Retirement Security: The President signed into law legislation that would allow for "catch up" contributions to retirement plans, helping millions of American women who took time out from the work force to care for dependent family members. The President's Social Security Commission also made a number of recommendations to vastly improve the treatment of women through Social Security, including the creation of property rights in a personal account for every woman who experiences a divorce, expanded benefits for widows, and new "anti-poverty" benefit guarantees that would disproportionately benefit women. Analysis shows that the Commission's provisions would lift nearly one million low-income Americans out of poverty, a majority of whom would be women, and that two to three million widows would see benefit increases as a result of the Commission's recommendations.
Helping Future Generations to Achieve the American Dream: The President has proposed that, for the first time, in the words of former Senator Daniel P. Moynihan (D-NY), "Social Security should be extended to include inheritable assets." This provision would disproportionately assist communities where life expectancies are unfortunately shorter than national averages, including African American households.
Giving Workers Better Information About Their Pensions: To enable workers to make independent, informed decisions, employers will be required to give workers quarterly benefit statements that include information about their individual accounts, including the value of their assets, their rights to diversify, and the importance of maintaining a diversified portfolio. The Secretary of Labor will be given authority to tailor this requirement to the needs of small plans. Under current law employers are only required to make statements available to workers on an annual basis.
Expanding Workers' Access to Investment Advice: The President calls on the Senate to pass the Retirement Security Advice Act - which passed the House with an overwhelming bipartisan majority. This legislation encourages employers to make investment advice available to workers and allows qualified financial advisors to offer individualized investment advice only if they agree to act solely in the interests of the workers they advise.
Spurring National Saving and Economic Growth: Tax relief legislation signed into law by the President would accelerate economic growth by expanding national saving. A 25-year-old wage earner who saves an additional $1,000 annually in an IRA or a 401(k) plan each year could accumulate an additional $165,000 by age 65, providing an extra $15,000 per year in retirement income. The President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security has found that the President's Social Security initiative would "lead to increased national saving" in a way that is necessary to foster long-term economic growth.
Empowering Workers through Enhanced Portability: Tax relief legislation signed into law by the President speeds up the vesting process - from 5 years to 3 years for "cliff" vesting - for any employer matching contributions made to 401(k) accounts. Faster vesting increases the pension wealth for individuals who change jobs or leave the workforce for periods of time.