Reply
Mon 18 Oct, 2004 04:56 pm
"As the Vanity Fair article's authors concede, the clerks present no document or other "smoking gun" proving that the conservative justices deliberately decided the case to suit their partisan preferences - a charge that members of the court on both sides have denied publicly.
While calling their account "by far the best" inside look yet, the article acknowledges that it is necessarily "lopsided, partisan, speculative and incomplete." "
That's quite a disclaimer, isn't it?