1
   

Importing Less Expensive Drugs Not Seen as Cure for U.S. Woe

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 09:03 am
Importing Less Expensive Drugs Not Seen as Cure for U.S. Woes

By EDUARDO PORTER

Published: October 16, 2004

customer at the Concourse Drugs pharmacy in the Bronx will pay about $118 to get a month's supply of 20-milligram Lipitor pills. At PharmacyinCanada.com, a Canadian online outlet, the same quantity of the drug, Pfizer's cholesterol-lowering medication, costs $79.

The difference has become a tempting political target. Senator John Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate, has made a campaign pledge to help cut Americans' prescription drug costs by allowing them to import drugs from Canada. President Bush has conceded that the idea is worth a try "if there's a safe way to do it." Bipartisan legislation in Congress would allow the reimportation of prescription drugs from Canada and other industrialized countries.

It may make political sense to point to Canada as a solution to high prescription drug prices in the United States. But many economists and health care experts say that importing drugs from countries that control their prices would do little to solve the problem of expensive drugs in the United States, where companies are free to set their own prices. Even the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that allowing Canadian drug imports would have a "negligible" impact on drug spending.
To begin with, there are not enough Canadians, or drugs in Canada, to make much of a dent in the United States. There are 16 million American patients on Lipitor, for instance - more than half the entire Canadian population.

Drug makers like Pfizer say they would reduce their shipments of drugs to distributors in Canada and other countries that re-export to the United States. "We are not going to supply drugs to diverters, in Canada or elsewhere," said Hank McKinnell, chairman and chief executive of Pfizer.

continued

What is needed is to level the playing field not the importation of drugs. We in the US should not be bearing the burden of being alone in paying for the R & D. And I might add advertisement. Isn't it time for congress to stop being advocates for the pharmaceutical industry and become advocates for the American public.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 493 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 09:11 am
I told squinney when watching the boys tackle this issue in the second debate...I wish someone would ask the really important question which is "Why are we having to consider strategies or questions about getting our drugs cheaper outside of what is supposedly the richest, freest, greatest country on earth and what is your strategy to make them affordable at every drug counter right here at home?"
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 09:25 am
Drug prices are part of the problem, but not close to being the biggest part.

The biggest part of the problem is out of control lawyering and the fact that the trial lawyers' guild has now become the most major support for the dem party with labor unions now in second place. John Edwards and his brethren are the biggest part of what we pay for medicine.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 09:25 am
gungasnake wrote:
Drug prices are part of the problem, but not close to being the biggest part.

The biggest part of the problem is out of control lawyering and the fact that the trial lawyers' guild has now become the most major support for the dem party with labor unions now in second place. John Edwards and his brethren are the biggest part of what we pay for medicine.


yawn.....
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 09:31 am
Gung
You are like a fish that is hooked on the republican line. Is it possible for you to have any independent though?
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 09:56 am
gunga , how you managed to hook Edwards on your prescription drug costs trolling line I'll never understand.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Oct, 2004 08:25 am
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Medicines Without Borders

By PETER ROST

Published: October 30, 2004


I have a confession to make. I am a drug company executive who believes we should legalize the reimportation of prescription drugs. I know that I have a different opinion from that of my employer on this matter, but to me, importation of drugs is about much more than money; it is about saving American lives.

According to a study by the Kaiser Family Foundation issued in 2000, 15 percent of uninsured children went without prescription medication in the previous year because of cost, 28 percent of uninsured adults went without prescription medication because of cost, and 87 percent of uninsured people with serious health problems reported trouble obtaining needed medication. We have 67 million Americans without insurance for drugs, according to the foundation. They pay cash - full price - and can't always afford life-saving drugs. American drug prices are about 70 percent higher than in Canada and almost twice as high as in Europe.

Drugs won't help save millions of lives if people can't afford to take them. I know that some people do not agree with me. Among them is President Bush. Senator John Kerry noted in the second presidential debate that Mr. Bush in 2000 had said that importation of drugs approved in the United States "makes sense," but that Mr. Bush had blocked legislation allowing it. Mr. Bush countered: "When a drug comes in from Canada, I want to make sure it cures you and doesn't kill you,'' and added, "What my worry is, is that, you know, it looks like it's from Canada, and it might be from a third world."

What Mr. Bush didn't say is that regulated importation of drugs would take away that risk, a risk Americans now face every day when they go surfing on the Internet for cheaper drugs. In fairness, Mr. Bush did say that he hoped to revisit the issue soon.

What I know about importation of drugs is based upon my experience in marketing pharmaceuticals in the United States and Europe for two decades. Importation or parallel trade of drugs has been done safely within Europe for over 20 years.

A few years back I was responsible for a region in Northern Europe. We had lots of drugs coming into my area through parallel traders. I countered by lowering some of my own prices and in the process doubled sales in my region in just two years.

In Europe, importers supply only authorized wholesalers or registered pharmacies; they do not sell to the public. So the chain remains closed. Authorized drugs are purchased from authorized wholesalers in one European Union country and sold to authorized distributors in another union country. This is the kind of system we should put in place in the United States.

Until that happens, to ensure safety, a good intermediate step is for states and cities to step in and provide access to lower-priced drugs. Boston and Springfield, Mass., have already established import programs for low-cost, Canadian drugs, while states like Minnesota and Wisconsin have established Web sites linking residents to Canadian pharmacies approved by state health officials.

Make no mistake about it, they are the real heroes in this battle. Every day Americans die because they can't afford life-saving drugs. Every day Americans die because Congress wants to protect the profits of giant drug corporations, half of the top 10 of which are French, British and Swiss conglomerates.

I have another confession to make. Americans are dying without the appropriate drugs because my industry and Congress are more concerned about protecting astronomical profits for conglomerates than they are about protecting the health of Americans.



Peter Rost, a doctor, is a marketing executive for Pfizer.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Importing Less Expensive Drugs Not Seen as Cure for U.S. Woe
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/24/2024 at 01:32:24