1
   

Protect Our Civil Liberties - Why is That Against Bush?

 
 
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 07:31 am
Why would a t-shirt stating "Protect Our Civil Liberties" be judged to be Pro Kerry / Against Bush?

October 14 - MEDFORD - President Bush taught three Oregon schoolteachers a new lesson in irony - or tragedy - Thursday night when his campaign removed them from a Bush speech and threatened them with arrest simply for wearing t-shirts that said "Protect Our Civil Liberties," the Democratic Party of Oregon reported.

The women were ticketed to the event, admitted into the event, and were then approached by event officials before the president's speech. They were asked to leave and to turn over their tickets - two of the three tickets were seized, but the third was saved when one of the teachers put it underneath an article of clothing.

"The U.S. Constitution was not available on site for comment, but expressed in a written statement support for "the freedom of speech" and "of the press" among other civil liberties," a Democratic news release said.

The Associated Press and local CBS affiliate KTVL captured Bush's principled stand against civil liberties in news accounts published immediately after the event.

The AP reported:

Three Medford school teachers were threatened with arrest and escorted from the event after they showed up wearing T-shirts with the slogan "Protect our civil liberties." All three said they applied for and received valid tickets from Republican headquarters in Medford.

The women said they did not intend to protest. "I wanted to see if I would be able to make a statement that I feel is important, but not offensive, in a rally for my president," said Janet Voorhies, 48, a teacher in training.

"We chose this phrase specifically because we didn't think it would be offensive or degrading or obscene," said Tania Tong, 34, a special education teacher.

Thursday's event in Oregon sets a new bar for a Bush/Cheney campaign that has taken extraordinary measures to screen the opinions of those who attend Bush and Cheney speeches. For months, the Bush/Cheney campaign has limited event access to those willing to volunteer in Bush/Cheney campaign offices. In recent weeks, the Bush/Cheney campaign has gone so far as to have those who voice dissenting viewpoints at their events arrested and charged as criminals.

Thursday's actions in Oregon set a new standard even for Bush/Cheney - removing and threatening with arrest citizens who in no way disrupt an event and wear clothing that expresses non-disruptive party-neutral viewpoints such as "Protect Our Civil Liberties."


Source



Wake -Up people!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 581 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 07:47 am
What people do not seem to understand is that there has been a sea change in our political system. The people who now run the government were not elected, they seized power. They have no intention of giving it up. Their view of this election is somewhat similar to that of South American dictators who use an election to legitimize the act of seizure. Only a clear and decisive electoral defeat will deny them this cover of legitimacy and remove them. If it is even close they will argue that the election is justification enough to continue themselves in office, and the 2000 election proved the federal judiciary is sufficiently ideological corrupted to agree with them.
0 Replies
 
Joe Republican
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 07:49 am
Don't take a lot of creedence in what you read for the DNC, their just as bad when it comes to propaganda.

Wait for it to hit other news sources (not a wire report), such as the Sproul implication of voter fraud. Then trace the steps to the RNC, listening to the DNC will only get you upset.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 08:12 am
Shades of Nazi Germany circa 1933. This president and administration does not seem to believe in the concept of freedom of speech and dissent. Where is the nation headed under this regime?
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 08:15 am
au1929 wrote:
Shades of Nazi Germany circa 1933. This president and administration does not seem to believe in the concept of freedom and dissent. Where is the nation headed under this regime?


4 more years I'm sorry to say...and then without a reelection to worry about the **** really hits the fan.....
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 01:34 pm
The Oregonian

Civil liberties T-shirts trigger 'alarm'
A Bush rally volunteer reacts to three women's attire and tosses them out
Saturday, October 16, 2004
JEFF MAPES


Janet Voorhies said she was curious to see how Republicans would react when she and two other women showed up at President Bush's Central Point rally wearing T-shirts stating "Protect Our Civil Liberties."


She got her answer before the president even spoke. The three women were ejected from the rally and escorted from the Jackson County Fairgrounds by state police officers who warned them they would be arrested if they tried to return.

Republican officials said they weren't exactly sure why a volunteer at the event demanded that the three women leave the rally. But a Bush campaign spokesman, Tracey Schmitt, said: "It is not the position of the campaign that wearing a T-shirt that says protect civil liberties is enough to conclude someone is disruptive."

Thursday night's action was the latest in a series of incidents in which people have been removed from Bush campaign events for expressing opposition to the president. Officials say the events are open to supporters and people who are considering voting for Bush, but they are quick to act when they think there is a possibility of disruption.

Voorhies, 48, a student teacher who lives in Ashland, said she and two other teachers obtained tickets to the event after saying they were undecided voters. She said she does not expect to vote for Bush, however.

She said the three decided to wear T-shirts that weren't critical of the president but expressed an issue "important to us. . . . We were testing the limits of the Republican Party, of who is allowed to be at a rally for the president."

Voorhies said the three made it through all three checkpoints and assured volunteers who questioned them that they would not disrupt the event. But when Voorhies was on her way to the bathroom, she was stopped by a volunteer who told her she wasn't welcome.

She said this volunteer pointed to her shirt and said it was "obscene."

Jackson County Republican Chairman Bryan Platt said he didn't see the incident but said the volunteer was trying to make a judgment about whether the women would be disruptive.

"It basically just triggered his alarm," Platt said of the volunteer, whom he did not name, "and we'll stand behind that. I wish (the women) would have just dressed in a way that was without that kind of intent to incite any kind of incident."

Lisa Sohn, a spokeswoman for Democrat John Kerry, said their rallies have been open to anyone and charged that the Bush administration has the attitude "that if you don't agree with them, it is not okay."
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 02:42 pm
That fits the Bush philosophy. My way or the highway. That is why we have gone from a nation to be admired to the most hated one worldwide. Thank you Mr.Bush.
0 Replies
 
willow tl
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 03:18 pm
I think it's funny that this issue has not garnered any notice from the conservatives here at A2K..but a post about mary chenney has 27 pages...go figure. :-(
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 09:22 am
I guess now we know.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Protect Our Civil Liberties - Why is That Against Bush?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/14/2024 at 05:37:16