3
   

Proof of a gathering threat with "allied" support

 
 
woiyo
 
Reply Thu 7 Oct, 2004 06:29 am
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/07/politics/07food.html?oref=login

It is clear that the "allies" Kerry wants to favor (France, Germany< Russia) can not be trusted. And of course the Bushwackers will find some way to convince otherwise.

"Through secret government-to-government trade agreements, the Hussein government earned more than $7.5 billion, the report says. At the same time, by demanding kickbacks from foreign companies that received oil or supplied consumer goods, Iraq received at least $2 billion more to spend on weapons or Mr. Hussein's extravagant palaces."

Yea, right, spend it on palaces my BUTT!!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 3 • Views: 746 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Oct, 2004 06:31 am
http://nytimes.com/imagepages/2004/10/07/international/07INTEL-GRAPH.html

He intended to use the cash to re-build his banned weapons arsenal!
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Thu 7 Oct, 2004 08:36 am
And to think...Woiyo says he is from "Reality."

Jeez!
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 7 Oct, 2004 08:38 am
Frank - Why in such a state of denial?

Which part of the report do you dispute?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Oct, 2004 08:46 am
Well, it really could be that Saddam had only weapons of mass corruption.
But I want to clarify that these mentioned names are merely the names of people that Iraq intended to bribe. There is no evidence that they were approached or that they accepted.

Obviously, this report is so embarrassing for the US (and UK) government(s) that now someone else must be damned.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Oct, 2004 08:48 am
Quote:
It is clear that the "allies" Kerry wants to favor (France, Germany< Russia)...


Where does this come from????

Quote:
... can not be trusted.


If you mean..."cannot be trusted any more than America when a buck or two is involved"...

...you should say that.

If not...this is from a fantasy world...not from "reality."


Quote:
... And of course the Bushwackers will find some way to convince otherwise.


Are you suggesting that people who want the moron out of office because he is seriously screwing up this country and the rest of the world....

....should not be allowed to use the arguments available to them, because....???


If so...you are dealing with fantasy...not reality!





Hope all is well with you, Woiyo.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Oct, 2004 10:46 am
It is clear that the "allies" Kerry wants to favor (France, Germany< Russia)...


Where does this come from????

Frank - it comes from the article.

No Frank, I mean what I say, France and Germany could not be trusted. They were working against the US and the Brits and the Ausies from the beginning.


I am suggesting that Bushwackers will never look at the big picture in their arguments. Bushwackers are not basing thier arguments on facts, only hatred of the man.

If one can not be objective, there can be no argument.

Yes-Frank, I am fine and the Yanks won a thriller last evening. All is right in the sprots world.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Oct, 2004 11:07 am
woiyo wrote:
If one can not be objective, there can be no argument.


Acknowledgment is the first step to improvement.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Proof of a gathering threat with "allied" support
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/13/2021 at 10:51:12