Proof of a gathering threat with "allied" support

http://nytimes.com/imagepages/2004/10/07/international/07INTEL-GRAPH.html

He intended to use the cash to re-build his banned weapons arsenal!

And to think...Woiyo says he is from "Reality."

Jeez!

Frank - Why in such a state of denial?

Which part of the report do you dispute?

Well, it really could be that Saddam had only weapons of mass corruption.
But I want to clarify that these mentioned names are merely the names of people that Iraq intended to bribe. There is no evidence that they were approached or that they accepted.

Obviously, this report is so embarrassing for the US (and UK) government(s) that now someone else must be damned.

Where does this come from????



If you mean..."cannot be trusted any more than America when a buck or two is involved"...

...you should say that.

If not...this is from a fantasy world...not from "reality."




Are you suggesting that people who want the moron out of office because he is seriously screwing up this country and the rest of the world....

....should not be allowed to use the arguments available to them, because....???


If so...you are dealing with fantasy...not reality!





Hope all is well with you, Woiyo.

It is clear that the "allies" Kerry wants to favor (France, Germany< Russia)...


Where does this come from????

Frank - it comes from the article.

No Frank, I mean what I say, France and Germany could not be trusted. They were working against the US and the Brits and the Ausies from the beginning.


I am suggesting that Bushwackers will never look at the big picture in their arguments. Bushwackers are not basing thier arguments on facts, only hatred of the man.

If one can not be objective, there can be no argument.

Yes-Frank, I am fine and the Yanks won a thriller last evening. All is right in the sprots world.

Acknowledgment is the first step to improvement.