Walter Hinteler wrote:If 'Pollack' isn't used in an anti-semistic way, it's just 'simply' insulting.
But may well be, your neighbourhood was an island in the use of some terms of American English.
Still unsure of what you're trying to say here Walter, but I am beginning to think you are accusing me of insulting someone. (Actually, I guess I am, but not in the way it appears you think I am).
Let's try this one last time:
I know "Pollack" is an ethnic slur (I just didn't know it had a Jewish component)
I don't use ethnic slurs to insult people.
I did not use "Pollack" to insult the Polish president.
I used the term sardonically to suggest (and here's where what might amount to an actual insult comes into play) that Kerry's apologists who contend his "coerced and bribed" comments did not insult anyone, came to that conclusion because they perceive these allies as being of less worth than the French; that our Polish allies are simply "Pollacks" who can be insulted without real concern.
Clearly any quip that needs this degree of explanation has been lost on the reader, but I respect you Walter and would not want you to continue to labor under what might be a false impression of me. I have numerous faults, but ethnic or racial bigotry is not among them. Having said this, if you still don't get it, I give up.
Just so this is not an entirely wasted posting I refer posters to this
LINK.
Apparently that sensitive and grandiloquent diplomat, Kerry of Vietnam has a habit of insulting our allies when they join us in an endeavor which he has some political reason to oppose:
This of the first Gulf Coalition partners:
But I'm sure his apologists don't find this insulting either.