At U.N., Bush defends Iraq invasion

Quote:

As it is it proves that five out of six people who can type are Kerry supporters.

Or 5 out of 6 people with internet access who can afford to screw off at their jobs/home.

0 Replies

I often wonder about that... lol.

I mean, how many of us are getting paid to do this?

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

If what you are saying is true Freeduck than Kerry will win by a landslide.

I don't know anyone who is working who who can't afford to "screw off" long enough to do a little reductio ad absurdum on the Bush "plan." In fact it is the guy who has a "job" who is the most likely to ignore to engage in discourse here.

I'm semi retired and tend to work at night. I don't fit your description at all. I'm here because I detest Bush and I like Kerry - and I see this forum as an opportunity to report on the reporters that you can't report the news when head is where the sun don't shine.

0 Replies

Ah - the pacifist speak.

I wonder if you spoke the same way when we went into Bosnia.

What I find amazing is how little value you all place in an agreement with a regime that invaded 2 nations, harbored WMD, assisted in financing terrorism was defeated twice by US forces and failed to live up to a single element of the cease fire agreement. No wonder we were attacked.

With pacifist like you all previously running this country, they actually thought they could get away with not only attacking this nation, but ignoring cease fire agreements.

Luckilly, many Americans are now aware and reject your positions.

0 Replies

Quote:

What I find amazing is how little value you all place in an agreement with a regime that invaded 2 nations, harbored WMD, assisted in financing terrorism was defeated twice by US forces and failed to live up to a single element of the cease fire agreement. No wonder we were attacked.

An agreement? I can't figure out what you mean.

I also think it's neccessary to point out that the 9/11 attacks had NOTHING TO DO with Iraq!!! Yet you have confused the two here.

Dare I say it? Just like Bush wants people to confuse the two...

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Like at the Times Abuzz. One person is being paid to run this piece of software. Much of the controversy about companies like Google going on the Board revolves around the fact that one person can own a whole platform that is designed to handle a lot of traffic.

The issue that's raised is whether a relatively simple program that can be easily duplicated should be allowed to be monopolized. One a monopoly is allowed the value of the platform is the advertising attached to it and the ability of the webmaster to censure and censure.

The irony is that if there is enough traffic to let the advertising pay for the clown who manages the site - there will be too much traffic to effectively monitor and referee the site.

There are laws against monopoly as there should be. But those who would control the market place and even our thinking should be constantly discouraged.

0 Replies

woiyo:

Quote:

What I find amazing is how little value you all place in an agreement with a regime that invaded 2 nations, harbored WMD, assisted in financing terrorism was defeated twice by US forces and failed to live up to a single element of the cease fire agreement. No wonder we were attacked.

I think it's much more amazing how little value Bush placed in an agreement with a regime that invaded 2 nations, harbored WMD, asisted in financing terrorism was defeated twice by US forces and failed to live up to a single element of the cease fire agreement. Not only was he ignoring all the telltale signs of an emminent Al Qaeda attack, but he was on vacation more than half the time while his poll numbers were dropping.

And lest we forget what both Powell and Rice said back in February of 2001.

0 Replies

Bush indeed wants a confused public. A confused public is putty in his hands.

The rest of us will simply feel we've been had.

Ignorance is still bliss, isn't it?

0 Replies

Cyclo - Recall the Cease Fire Agreement signed after Gulf War 1? How soon we forget.

Also, no one has mentioned a direct link between 9-11 and Iraq.

0 Replies

What link between Iraq and 9/11?

You mean the phony intelligence reports?

0 Replies

woiyo wrote:

Ah - the pacifist speak.

I wonder if you spoke the same way when we went into Bosnia.

I was against going into Bosnia. I assume you were for it then?

Quote:

What I find amazing is how little value you all place in an agreement with a regime that invaded 2 nations, harbored WMD, assisted in financing terrorism was defeated twice by US forces and failed to live up to a single element of the cease fire agreement. No wonder we were attacked.

We were attacked because we were overly focused on a reduced threat from Iraq and not paying attention to the threats of Al-Qaida.

Quote:

With pacifist like you all previously running this country, they actually thought they could get away with not only attacking this nation, but ignoring cease fire agreements.

Didn't you just say something about Bosnia? Was it a pacifist that sent our troops there?

0 Replies

At U.N., Bush defends Iraq invasion

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know