Cyclop, I will agree that the media does seem to be more interested in 'gotcha' than in printing the facts, both good and bad. And, again, if the Rasmussen poll is anywhere near accurate, however, they are far more likely to print a 'gotcha' concerning Bush than they are Kerry. <-- Fox
I think the primary reason for this is because Bush has more opportunities to screw up on more issues, because he's in charge currently.
That, and the fact is that his advisors make him look bad. Remember, in many cases, his advisors - Ashcroft, Rice, Rumsfeld, et al - are the ones behind the majority of the policy decisions (much like any presidency). I'm against Bush's staff more than I am against Bush himself, by far.
Find one thing Kerry stood for from the start to finish that was of a true benefit. <--- Baldimo
How about finding out the truth behind Iran Contra? Kerry was a key senator in that process.
That's one. For more, look for yourself:
http://www.aflcio.org/issuespolitics/politics/kerry_bills.cfm
It has every bill with Kerry's name on it listed.
Now, is he pivotal in his senate role? Not really. But it's not like he did nothing at all. A good counterexample would be Cheney - he had 2 bills total.
Compared to Bush's record before he was elected president, Kerry looks busy as hell....
Cycloptichorn