1
   

Another Kerry Purple Heart question?

 
 
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 02:43 pm
I saw this after the evening news last night, and found the website. A non-SBV/Repub source....



The Point Archives

Kerry And The Purple Heart - 09/14/04

Controversy has surrounded the Massachusetts Senator's first Purple Heart. John Kerry claims to have been wounded in battle on December 2nd, 1968, and therefore, deserving of the medal. The officer in command of the event was an eyewitness. He reports there was no enemy fire. That John Kerry had a self-inflicted wound.

The doctor who treated Kerry called the wound a scratch, which was treated with antiseptic and a band aid. Kerry's request for a Purple Heart was turned down by his chain-of-command. Yet he somehow finagled one by other means.

Kerry challenges his critics to examine the official Navy records. So, we've taken up his challenge. Here are the facts. There is no after action report, which was required had there been enemy fire. There is no personnel casualty report detailing Kerry's wounds. The December 2nd event didn't qualify for either.

In an exclusive, The Point can report that a casualty card does not exist for Kerry's wound. Described by Navy offiicials as "valuable as gold," a casualty card documented a wound qualifying for a Purple Heart. While casualty cards exist for Kerry's 2nd and 3rd Purple Hearts, none exists for the first (see them here).

The complete absence of these three documents thoroughly discredits John Kerry's claim that he suffered a combat wound.

In his dishonest efforts to try to create an image that he is some kind of war hero, Kerry insulted each and every serviceman who was legitimately wounded. Many of whom who refused to apply for Purple Hearts even when they qualified for them.

The Point issues a challenge to John Kerry to produce these three documents. So far, his campaign has released hundreds of pages of documents, but the ones that matter most, simply don't exist.

And that's The Point.

I'm Mark Hyman.


Source: http://www.newscentral.tv/uploads/franchise/point/point-20040914.shtml
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 885 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
steveH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 02:48 pm
Maybe the DNC will just forge some military records on Microsoft Word supporting Kerry's bogus purple heart and send them to Dan Rather at CBS News!
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 03:17 pm
Boy do I love watching you hypocritical conservatives trashing people who actually went to serve when called...while defending a moron who opted to evade service.

During Bill Clinton's 8 years in office, all we heard about what that he was a draft dodger.

Now you hypocrites actually have to trash people who went in favor of people who dodged.

Hypocrisy...thy name is American conservative.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 03:18 pm
Oops, where are my manners.

I forgot to say thank you for the laughs.

THANK YOU!
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 03:20 pm
steveH wrote:
Maybe the DNC will just forge some military records on Microsoft Word supporting Kerry's bogus purple heart and send them to Dan Rather at CBS News!


It wouldn't matter either way steveH, since Kerry refuses to release his complete military record.

You see, only Republicans get crucified in the press for not being able to produce every 35+ year old piece of paper that was produced during their military career.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 04:46 pm
This isn't really another purple heart question, it's one of the same old purple heart questions.
0 Replies
 
A Lone Voice
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 04:54 pm
Actually, in what this editorial is calling an "exclusive" is an area that hasn't been discussed before, has it?
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 05:12 pm
Lone Voice, several messages above, provides a link to the source for this great editorial from The Point. Check it out if you can. Here are some other topics that they have explored:
9/14: Flights in/out of Las Vegas
9/7: National Professional Paintball League World Series
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 05:15 pm
You're right, the part that is called 'exclusive' has not been brought up before, but it is just more picking at the same old scab. The beginning of the article includes accusations that have already been countered. For instance, the doctor that says he treated him didn't. And the officer in command who says he was there wasn't, according to the other two people who were actually there. I'm not very impressed with the missing card argument since it would only matter if the accusers were credible.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 05:28 pm
this is the stuff I found back then on that first Purple Heart (click)
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 05:32 pm
Another crock of you-know-what if you ask me...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Another Kerry Purple Heart question?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/04/2025 at 10:37:20