joefromchicago wrote:
Quote:You admit that you don't know how you know what you know,
Yes, how can a thought know where thoughts comes from? (Oops, another object)
Quote:yet you contend that beliefs and guesses are objects. I might ask "how do you know that?" but I can pretty much anticipate your answer.
Yes, and I can anticipate your next question, and the next etc. How do you know that?
How do you know that?
Quote:I am, however, surprised that a non-dualist like yourself, who denies the distinction between subject and object, would identify anything as an object, and even ascribe qualities to those objects, as you have done here. Did you renounce non-dualism when I wasn't looking?
Nondualism cannot be renounced, i.e. by whom,
Yes you are correct
joefromchicago, there are no ?'objects', they are simply the seeing of them. Language creates objects out of everything, or rather out of nothing. Might be better put, Beliefs and guesses are ?'the observing of them' and ?'the observing of them' does not have beliefs or make guesses....Or, What beliefs and guesses?
There is guessinnng
.
There is believinnng
.
There are no guessers or believers or guesses or beliefs.