BillyFalcon wrote:Our discussion about Hitler is strongly related to Hannah Arendt's famous quote about "The Banality of Evil." It is often used to label "evil" as being commonplace, but she distinguished a difference between common and commonplace. I would really like a reaction from Merry Andrew and diawon.
From "Contemporary Philosophy:"
In a correspondence with Grafton, in 1963, Arendt distinguishes between banal and commonplace with regard to the banality of evil. Arendt says: "For me, there is a very important difference: 'commonplace' is what frequently, commonly happens, but something can be banal even if it is not common." (18) Banal does not presuppose that the evil has a commonplace in everyone. Evil can become banal even if evil itself is not trivial to anyone. Thus, banality of evil does not mean that the evil itself is trivial and common to everybody. This distinction between commonplace and banal is clear in a conference organized on her work in Toronto, in 1972, in which Arendt affirms that the notion that "there is an Eichmann in each one of us" is a complete misunderstanding. Arendt says: "...you say that I said there is an Eichmann in each one of us. Oh no! There is none in you and none in me! This doesn't mean that there are not quite a number of Eichmanns. But they look really quite different. I always hated this notion of 'Eichmann in each one of us'. This is simply not true. This would be as untrue as the opposite, that Eichmann is in nobody." (19)
Hmmm - I don't feel as if I have ever really understood that quote.
What I do understand from it is probably encapsulated in, I think, (not sure if I have the right fella), Eichmann - the bean counter who calmly, and with great assiduity, managed the bureaucratic side of the genocide industry - I recently saw his testimony at Nuremburg again - still proud of his efficient system - still unable to see the horror of what he had helped to achieve....there was a horrible banality to the details of the industry of horror. One also thinks of the language of war - body counts, collatoral damage - the people who describe war as though it were a chess game, with no real carnage - who can refer to Vietnam as "a bloody nose".
Also - I sort of DO think there is, in a way, an Eichmann in each of us. If there is an Eichmann, or a Hitler, in ANY of us - this means there is the potential in each of us...and do we all not stand by and allow countless atrocities to be committed in our names? For just one tiny instance, I am shocked by the number of American citizens who seem to have no idea of the atrocities backed and funded by your government - and supported by mine - (think the overturn of the elected Iranian governemnt in the fifties, Chile, the Congo etc...) - the same for Russian citizens - the people of my country...
I also, in my job, deal constantly with the torment and suffering people can impose on others - sometimes almost unspeakable torment - all in the cosy domestic sphere...and I work with the kiddies so badly abused or neglected (often quite without intent) that they are incapable of empathy and normal development. Some of these traumatized little folk will be dangerous adults....given the right circumstances, would they be Hitlers?
All this makes me well aware of my good fortune in the lottery of life.
I am rambling...