0
   

Kerry's fall from grace

 
 
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 01:25 pm
After locking up the Democratic nomination in the primaries last spring, John Kerry took a snowboarding vacation in Idaho. In a run down the mountain, he fell. A reporter joshed him about it. "I don't fall," Kerry snapped. Pointing to a Secret Service agent nearby, Kerry said: "That [expletive deleted] knocked me down."

"Sen. John Kerry is angry at the way his campaign has botched the attacks from the Swift boat veterans and has ordered a staff shake-up that will put former Clinton aides in top positions," reported the New York Daily News.

"[Kerry] wanted to go after the Swift boat attacks, but his top aides said no," a "longtime senior Kerry adviser" told the News.

The advice Kerry's senior aides gave him was that he should leave response to the Swifties to surrogates, because Kerry's friends in the major media would do their best to bury the story.

This didn't work, because the story the Swifties wanted to tell got out anyway, through talk radio and dozens of Web logs. But it was good advice. The Swifties didn't really take off in terms of public consciousness until after Kerry went postal on them.

Kerry is taking aboard former Clinton aides Joe Lockhart and Joel Johnson, experts at maligning the women who said Bill Clinton had forced his attentions on them. But efforts to mau-mau the Swifties just keeps the Swifties in the news.

Some Democrats have urged that Kerry assault (again) Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard. But this wouldn't answer questions about Kerry's service, and most Americans are more interested in fighting the war on terror than in refighting a war that ended badly nearly three decades ago.

Back in the spring of 2003, when I thought Kerry was the hero he claimed to be, I still thought he was likely to be the weakest of the Democratic candidates in a general election, because he is a poor campaigner and because his record after three terms in the Senate was both lackluster, and decidedly left of center, especially on national security issues.

Kerry was using his war service as insulation against attacks on his voting record. (How dare you criticize my votes on defense. I served in Vietnam! How dare you bring up my flip-flops on Iraq. I served in Vietnam!) But thanks to the Swifties, that insulation has been stripped away.

No sitting senator has been elected president since Kennedy in 1960. This is in large part because there are all those votes in the Congressional Record for opposition researchers to sift through.

GOP consultant Rich Galen thinks there is another reason. Senators have small staffs and no real responsibilities. They do not know how to manage and to delegate, as governors do. Galen thinks Kerry's already top-heavy staff will become more so with the addition of the Clinton people, making decision-making even more sluggish and chaotic.

There is also likely to be more acrimony in the Kerry high command. Campaign manager Mary Beth Cahill and other top aides come from the camp of Sen. Ted Kennedy, which is not overfond of the Clintonistas.

Finally, there is the question of loyalty. Hillary's best shot at being president would come in 2008, at the end of a second Bush term.

No staff shake-up can cure the fundamental problem, which is Kerry himself. His aides could not have known whether, or how much Kerry had embellished his Vietnam service, and it was he more than they who chose to make his 4 1/2 months in Vietnam 35 years ago the central rationale for his candidacy for president.

Kerry had to know that he had mightily peeved his shipmates when, in 1971, he accused them and other Vietnam veterans of routinely committing grisly war crimes. It's astounding that he gave no thought earlier to damage control.

The Swifties have said they will fold their tent if he apologizes for his slander, and authorizes release of all of his military records. Kerry had an opportunity to do this at the American Legion convention Sept. 1. But he let the opportunity go by. John Kerry never falls. Everything is always someone else's fault.

link
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 569 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 05:28 pm
Glad to see Richard Scaife's gang is still churning out the chum.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 05:32 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
Glad to see Richard Scaife's gang is still churning out the chum.


oh well, joe. scaife's not so bad. it's that liberal,soros, that's messing things up with his money.

it's not like "the arkansas project" was out to bring down the president or anything.

jeezzzz... Laughing
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 05:45 pm
I think everyone ought to have either a hobby or a cause. I was hoping that Richard had developed an interest in horses (that would be an interest in cayuses, ) but apparently he just like to fund coup d'etats.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 06:01 pm
With freinds like The Congressional Record, Kerry doesn't need enemies:

Quote:
SRES 95 ATS

108th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. RES. 95
Commending the President and the Armed Forces of the United States of America.


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 20, 2003
Mr. FRIST (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. WARNER, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. REID, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Allard, Mr. Allen, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Biden, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Bond, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Burns, Mr. Campbell, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Carper, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Chambliss, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Coleman, Ms. Collins, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Corzine, Mr. Craig, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Dayton, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Enzi, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. Feinstein Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. Graham of Florida, Mr. Graham of South Carolina, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Hollings, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Kyl, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Lieberman, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Lott, Mr. Lugar, Mr. McCain, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Miller, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Reed, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Smith, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Specter, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Sununu, Mr. Talent, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Voinovich, and Mr. Wyden) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


RESOLUTION
Commending the President and the Armed Forces of the United States of America.

Whereas Saddam Hussein has failed to comply with United Nations Security Council Resolutions 678, 686, 687, 688, 707, 715, 949, 1051, 1060, 1115, 1134, 1137, 1154, 1194, 1205, 1284, and 1441;

Whereas the military action now underway against Iraq is lawful and fully authorized by the Congress in Sec. 3(a) of Public Law 107-243, which passed the Senate on October 10, 2002, by a vote of 77-23, and which passed the House of Representatives on that same date by a vote of 296-133;

Whereas more than 225,000 men and women of the United States Armed Forces are now involved in conflict against Iraq;

Whereas over 200,000 members of the Reserves and National Guard have been called to active duty for the conflict against Iraq and other purposes; and

Whereas the Senate and the American people have the greatest pride in the men and women of the United States Armed Forces, and the civilian personnel supporting them, and strongly support them in their efforts: Now, therefore, be it


Resolved, That the Senate--

(1) commends and supports the efforts and leadership of the President, as Commander in Chief, in the conflict against Iraq;

(2) commends, and expresses the gratitude of the Nation to all members of the United States Armed Forces (whether on active duty, in the National Guard, or in the Reserves) and the civilian employees who support their efforts, as well as the men and women of civilian national security agencies who are participating in the military operations in the Persian Gulf region, for their professional excellence, dedicated patriotism and exemplary bravery;

(3) commends and expresses the gratitude of the Nation to the family members of soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and civilians serving in operations against Iraq who have borne the burden of sacrifice and separation from their loves ones;

(4) expresses its deep condolences to the families of brave Americans who have lost their lives in this noble undertaking, over many years, against Iraq;

(5) joins all Americans in remembering those who lost their lives during Operation Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm in 1991, those still missing from that conflict, including Captain Scott Speicher, USN, and the thousands of Americans who have lost their lives in terrorist attacks over the years, and in the Global War on Terrorism; and

(6) expresses sincere gratitude to British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his government for their courageous and steadfast support, as well as gratitude to other allied nations for their military support, logistical support, and other assistance in the campaign against Saddam Hussein's regime.
END


Now, lets just look at something here ... as a sponsor of the resolution, Kerry says, endorses, and explicitly is on record as stating, by himself in concert with the resolution's cosponsors, each individually and in the aggregate:
Quote:
... Whereas Saddam Hussein has failed to comply with United Nations Security Council Resolutions 678, 686, 687, 688, 707, 715, 949, 1051, 1060, 1115, 1134, 1137, 1154, 1194, 1205, 1284, and 1441;

Whereas the military action now underway against Iraq is lawful and fully authorized by the Congress in Sec. 3(a) of Public Law 107-243, which passed the Senate on October 10, 2002, by a vote of 77-23, and which passed the House of Representatives on that same date by a vote of 296-133 ...


So, Kerry endorsed the war before he was against the war .... Sheeesh. Fall from grace? The boy is graceless from the git-go.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Kerry's fall from grace
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 06:50:26