Re: Women of A2K, have you seen this ?
angie wrote:
10. Throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Bush's first choice to head the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Mary Sheila Gall, opposed efforts to regulate baby walkers, baby bath seats, bunk beds, and voted to eliminate the standard for fire-resistant sleepwear during her ten years on the commission (she was appointed by Bush's father). Gall's rationale for putting children at risk? Parents should take more responsibility for protecting their infants.
I will be the first to admit that I used to laugh at fire-resistant sleepwear for young children when my own children took naps in clothing that I'm sure you could set a match to. What's up with fire-resistant sleepwear? I would rather have smoke alarms in my house. Feel free to explain that to me!
As far as the rest of it goes, of course, parents should be responsible for their children's safety. That doesn't mean that living in a country of such great wealth, that we should tolerate unsafe equipment that we use for our babies and young children. We are parents. We can't stare at our kids 24/7, as suggested to be responsibility. I remember putting my kids, when very small, in a play pen or bouncy seat, anything that kept them contained and safe while I went to the basement to do laundry. Is this saying that I was an irresponsible parent for doing laundry? Give me a break!
angie wrote:9. Even more ironic than rain on your wedding day.
Bush chose Nancy Pfotenhauer, president and CEO of the right-wing Independent Women's Forum, to serve on the National Advisory Committee on Violence Against Women. The IWF actively opposed the Violence Against Women Act. According to IWF's web site, "The battered women's movement has outlived its useful beginnings."
Domestic violence recently happened to me. I was thrilled to see that it was being taken seriously by police and judges. It never was throughout the 80' even, where cops would give my husband a ride to someone's house and leave him to come get me in the morning. It wasn't fun and not taken seriously.
Don't get me on my soap box about this issue! It could take pages!! "Just get out." is not so simple for those who have never had to live it. I feel that this has just take women back to the stone ages.[/quote]
angie wrote:8. But women are already 1.2 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs!
Bush slammed the door shut on the White House Office for Women's Initiatives and Outreach, which worked with women's advocacy groups on public policy and political issues. His 2004 budget eliminated funding for the Women's Educational Equity Act to promote equity for girls and women in education.
What?? Deal with the figures of what men make a year, an hour, a week, opposed to women. How about how many divorced or single parent households are run by women that can't have career opportunity because they have to attend to kids, which is plenty demanding enough after 8+ hours of work. There is only so much stress an individual can take. Someone has to care for the kids and it usually is a woman.
Both, men and women need to be educated to support their families today. I give my daughter the exact same standards as son, maybe even a little higher. She may be a single parent wanting her children. I don't mean this as any disrespect to any father at all. I believe it has genetic origin, if you look closely. Women need their children, psychologically. Men need to feel their family is provided for, again, psychologically speaking. Big difference!
I don't mean to come off as a battle of the sexes at all. I am only stating my own observations of behavior, which is different. I see men working overtime, at a high stress, and higher paying job so their family can have what they need and/or want. I have seen women, with lower paying jobs do so for flexibility, to be there and not get fired over their childrens needs coming first. Both are to be respected for their efforts, although differing mentality behind why they choose a differing way of providing, not insulted for differences.
angie wrote:7. Juggle this.
Under the guise of helping working families, particularly working mothers, the Bush administration proposed' tHe so~called FariilyTime' Flexibility Act to abolish federally mandated overtlme pay for .. workers. Democrats prevented this bill from coming to the floor, but Bush pushed the new rules through the Department of Labor and said he'd veto any legislation that attempted to block the rule changes.
Give me more info on this. Are you saying that there is no such thing as time and a half for working overtime as helping the American worker? How does this help>
angie wrote:6. Head Start/False Start
Bush appointed Wade Horn as assistant secretary for family support in the U.S. Health and Human Services Department. As president of the National Fatherhood Institute, Horn said that low-income kids whose parents aren't married should be last in line for Head Start and other benefits. Horn tried to back away from tnese statements at his confirmation hearings. Then, after Horn's appointment, HHS began to offer special services to welfare recipients - if they agree to marry.
Personally, I do not like this Head Start Program at all. We are working people. We have a house, with payments, employer assist health insurance, bills coming out our ears. I'm sure most can identify. We had nothing left over, after bills.
Then, I hear our local public school has a pre-school program. Checked out the prices on pre-school lately? My youngest is now 13 and it was very expensive then. I could only afford to send her once a week. If I were on food stamps or some sort of welfare, my daughter could have gone to our local public school for a few hours a day, five days a week, but not our kid. We have too much money or assets?
If it isn't open to all, especially in a public school, shut it down. Since when did small children with food stamp parents need pre-school any more than a working person, scraping to get by? Get rid of it!! It was a luxury that my daughter really didn't need, but I felt would ease her into school.
kindergarten wasn't even required, when I went to school. I lived without it. My mom didn't even know how to drive a car, so I got no introduction. You can't really work and get food stamps. Check out the limits, if you don't believe me. What makes food stamp kids more in need of preparation for public school than any working person's child?
angie wrote:5. So now do we need a Department of Homeroom Security?
Secretary of Education Roderick Paige called the National Education Association, which represents teachers across the nation, a "terrorist organization." Paige later said his comment was a bad joke. The union angered Paige by raising concerns about Bush's signature No Child Left Behind Act, which his administration has refused to adequately fund.
I hate to be dumb as a rock, but would someone explain to me exactly who our president is, Bush or Hitler reincarnated? I don't get this issue.
.
angie wrote: 4Did we say medical privacy? We meant medical piracy.
The Bush Department of Justice attempted to subpoena the medical records of women who had abortions, claiming they needed the records in their efforts to defend a challenge to the so-called partial-birth abortion ban, signed by the president last year. The Department of Justice dropped its efforts to collect records after a judge ruled that the action would threaten women's medical privacy, but the DOJ is still pursuing records from other providers.
As a practicing RN, it is illegal for me to give a family member that does not have POA any information as to what medications they are receiving. I am not allowed to state a medical diagnosis. This is clearly illegal to share any information, last I noticed, meaning last night at work. There are things reported, for efforts of eliminating disease, which doctors report, with no names attached, like rabies. They report cases, not individuals.
angie wrote:3. Barefoot,cpregnant, and in sync with their inborn nature.
President Bush chose Leon Kass, MD to head the President's Council of Bioethics. Kass has written, "For the first time in human history, mature women by the tens of thousands live the entire decade of their twenties - their most fertile years - neither in the homes of their fathers nor in the homes of their husbands; unprotected, lonely, and out of sync with their inborn nature."
Sorry to go brain dead with this. Please explain the meaning of this issue.
angie wrote:2. Physician, heal thyself.
In June 2004, Bush re-appointed Dr. W David Hager to the Food and Drug Administration's Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee. Hager has written about Christ's ability to heal women's illnesses and reportedly refused to prescribe contraceptives to unmarried women. Hager was the leading force behind the FDA's rejection of over-the-counter sales of emergency contraception, over the overwhelming recommendation of two FDA advisory panels.
Brain dead again! What does this mean to women of today?
angie wrote:1. It'll be a cold day in Miami...
The Senate in July 2004 approved Bush's nomination of James Leon Holmes to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kansas. Bolmes, an anti-Abortion Rights activist, supports a Constitutional amendment to ban all abortions and
said that "concern for rape victims is a red herring because conceptions from rape occur with approximately the same frequency as snowfall in Miami." Holmes has also spoken out against the separation of church and state, and co-wrote (with his wife) an article proclaiming that,
"The wife is to subordinate herself to the husband... and... place herself under the authority of the man." Holmes' views on women's rights can be summed up in his belief that supporting feminism ultimately contributes "to the culture of death."
www.emilyslist.org
Sorry if anyone doesn't like it, but there is separation of church and state, with good reason.