Why is there no logical reason for banning recreational drug use?
There might be. For instance it would not be a good idea to introduce mind altering drugs to people before they were old or educated enough to consider the up and down sides of recreational drug use. Same as with car use.
But I assumed you would know I was talking about the realm of adults. Silly to debate the appropriate age or whatever before establishing the logical grounds for or against though.
In that realm, I can't think of any logical reason to ban recreational use for other than known drugs that have proven to have no benefits at all. I don't advocate the taking of Hemlock or arsenic unless it's a special case.
But I did ask, so if you have some logical reasons for banning recreational drug use, let's hear them.