19
   

The Atheist Case For Recreational Drug Use

 
 
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Tue 7 Jun, 2016 05:57 am
I see . . . so you don't know what complement means, huh?
Leadfoot
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Jun, 2016 06:03 am
@Setanta,
Why just last week I built a servo driver with complementary transistor pairs.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Tue 7 Jun, 2016 06:05 am
Complement is meaningless in the sentence you wrote. But I'm happy that you hurried out to look up the definition so you could pretend you knew that all along.
Leadfoot
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jun, 2016 06:06 am
@Setanta,
Hahahahahaha!

I AM your complement.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  4  
Reply Sun 12 Jun, 2016 04:15 am
@Leadfoot,
Hmmm...I seem to have missed this thread. Without going back over the battlefield has anybody come up with the point that since 'theism' itself can be considered to be a 'recreational drug', the case for atheists to avoid recreational drug use seems to be self explanatory ? Very Happy
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jun, 2016 04:52 am
@fresco,
Ah, well, not everybody wants nowadays opium, even not the masses. Wink
Leadfoot
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 13 Jun, 2016 02:15 pm
@fresco,
Quote:
has anybody come up with the point that since 'theism' itself can be considered to be a 'recreational drug',
As can atheism my man..
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  2  
Reply Mon 13 Jun, 2016 02:19 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Ah, well, not everybody wants nowadays opium, even not the masses
Oh, I would definitely argue that point.

When we have two candidates for president as in the current pair, the masses are definitely using something mind altering, and not in a good way..
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 07:28:53