1q2w3e wrote:blatham wrote:1q2w3e wrote:There was no left wing or right wing in Jesus's time, but Jesus wasn't a liberal.
Your evidence or logic being?
Gosh, only conservatives have to support their opinions here? What a frikkin enlightened board!
He didn't think people should ever divorce their spouses, or swear, and he encourages the ascetic life and keeping the old laws.
No, anyone who makes a claim that something is true ought to support that claim. For example, I could write a post saying Jesus was probably a homosexual or that more Republicans are charged (per capita) with child abuse than are Green Party members. What worth is such a statement by itself, without some evidence or rationale to make it understandable or believable?
When someone makes such a truth claim, the burden of proving it (or at least, making it compelling) falls to that person.
Now, where did Jesus say that one ought not to swear? And how did he define 'swear'? And what passage, in Jesus' words, gives an admonition against divorce? And same with ascetic life? And what would he have meant by 'ascetic'? And how do you know that? Likewise, where is the passage on old laws?
But more to the point, why would you use those criteria to describe a liberal? John DiIulio, who was the fellow Bush first put in charge of the faith based initiatives, related in Esquire magazine two years ago a time when he walked past Carl Rove's office and Car was yelling "You tell him that we will f*ck him like he's never been f*cked before!" And we know from Tucker Carlson that Bush swears a lot. And do you consider that either Bush or Kerry or Rove or Clinton live an ascetic life?