Reply
Thu 26 Aug, 2004 05:57 pm
What do you think
When John Kerry testfied to Congress his action were a low blow to all others in the
service, he could not have done a better job at lowering moral if he had tried. So lets
think what if he really was an enemy collaborator He did meet with them illegally was it
in France. So lets see meets with the enemy destroyed troop moral, so I guess my real
question is, could he have been a spy while serving in vietnam. Could it be spying was the
reason he was in Combodia on Christmas to again meet with the enemy, no wonder there was
no report of this in his U.S. record.
Re: What do you think
Ibredd wrote:What do you think
When John Kerry testfied to Congress his action were a low blow to all others in the
service, he could not have done a better job at lowering moral if he had tried. So lets
think what if he really was an enemy collaborator He did meet with them illegally was it
in France. So lets see meets with the enemy destroyed troop moral, so I guess my real
question is, could he have been a spy while serving in vietnam. Could it be spying was the
reason he was in Combodia on Christmas to again meet with the enemy, no wonder there was
no report of this in his U.S. record.
may I show you something in a tinfoil hat?
and i will provide the corner and the chair.
What do you think?
When John Kerry testfied to Congress, his actions were a low blow to all others in the
service. He could not have done a better job at lowering morale if he had tried. So lets
think, what if he really was an enemy collaborator? He did meet with them illegally, was it
in France? So lets see, he meets with the enemy, destroyed troop morale, so I guess my real
question is, could he have been a spy while serving in Vietnam? Could it be spying was the
reason he was in Cambodia on Christmas, to again meet with the enemy? No wonder there was
no report of this in his U.S. record.
Cycloptichorn
Cycloptichorn wrote:What do you think?
When John Kerry testfied to Congress, his actions were a low blow to all others in the
service. He could not have done a better job at lowering morale if he had tried. So lets
think, what if he really was an enemy collaborator? He did meet with them illegally, was it
in France? So lets see, he meets with the enemy, destroyed troop morale, so I guess my real
question is, could he have been a spy while serving in Vietnam? Could it be spying was the
reason he was in Cambodia on Christmas, to again meet with the enemy? No wonder there was
no report of this in his U.S. record.
Cycloptichorn
Could I forward my posts to you for grammer checks as well?
Could I forward my posts to you for gramm
ar checks as well?
Cycloptichorn
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=32213
So, Rumsfeld -- sacrificial lamb? Does he deserve to be fired?
Let's talk!
I wouldn't mind seeing him removed from the position. Not because of what others think he has done but because of the attention that these things have brought upon the Bush administration. I think he has done a good job but his reputation has suffered and that makes it harder to get things done.
Re: What do you think
Ibredd wrote:What do you think
When John Kerry testfied to Congress his action were a low blow to all others in the
service, he could not have done a better job at lowering moral if he had tried. So lets
think what if he really was an enemy collaborator He did meet with them illegally was it
in France. So lets see meets with the enemy destroyed troop moral, so I guess my real
question is, could he have been a spy while serving in vietnam. Could it be spying was the
reason he was in Combodia on Christmas to again meet with the enemy, no wonder there was
no report of this in his U.S. record.
Put the bottle down and back away s-l-o-w-l-y.
absolutely...any pretense...any excuse......send him home....
Baldimo wrote:I wouldn't mind seeing him removed from the position. Not because of what others think he has done but because of the attention that these things have brought upon the Bush administration. I think he has done a good job but his reputation has suffered and that makes it harder to get things done.
I agree. Whether he is responsible or not doesn't really matter. The buck has to stop somewhere and if he doesn't want to pass it to the president or vice president then he needs to step down.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace