@Smileyrius,
A couple of questions, if you would indulge me, could you define the terms as they fit into your ideology? Suffering, religion and ego.
Suffering.
Harmful beliefs regarding pain and regarding obstacles in your way.
harmful conclusions based on past pain.
Harmful and false conclusions about life in general (fictitious facts), resulting from noted life observations becoming exposed to the above and combining ideas with the above ideas, thereby producing brand new conclusions and ideology.
Religion.
The spiritual aspect of the experience that the human being is (the aspect that cannot be labeled, isn't available to be pointed at, can only be endured in a purely personal manner, and cannot be memorized, shared, idealized, or described),
It's status as incomprehensible, being kept as a false verbal claim only while all kinds of abuse and compromise to this status is constantly being introduced and established.
The compromising content are attacking all spiritual phenomenon and exprerssion Wich does not surrender to this religions expression and articulation, of spiritual energy.
The compromised content is denying the existence of all remaining integral aspects and components of spirituality which isn't helping the fabricators agenda, (to claim that one factor of something is its sole cause while it was merely a contributing factor alongside additional ones,
although it is truly there, it is a lie to represent it as the exclusive factor).
The religion is offering you your essence that you already are, presented as an external commodity that you can obtain only under certain terms and conditions (no religion is telling you that you along with everything else is God, provided that ego, idea, and label are abandoned).
Ego.
Ego is the discontinueity of the following.
An infant in the crib successfully managed to experience hunger and its resolution, without mentally addressing the experiences as an entity who owns the hunger, whom the hunger affects, etc.
Ego is the inability to think without (the delusion of) a manger controlling the process.
Instead of
I think,
There is this thought..
Why can't there be a utility in a brains awareness of an idea if the idea isn't owned by a label?
A computer does it to perfection, and so does it the human scanning mechanism to perfection.
How can the label be perceived as helpful upon the realization that it isn't anything more than a label?
Have you ever gotten great advice from a name?
Also why do you suppose that man invented an invisible man in the sky,
A person was hiking with a headlight at night.
Upon noticing the bright circle of light in front of him,
He begun chasing it..
He is still running believing that this time, he is so experienced chasing,
That today, the chase will finally resolve itself with the successful acquisition of the beautiful bright light....
(This also explains, sexual addictions, urges and dependency.
But I'm not sure it is helpful here)
The mind of the spiritual energy that man is, is confusing the projection of good that is themselves, as a totally separated entity.
Layers upon layers of negative attitude to ones self engulf the person and give him reason to believe that the beautiful projection of them, isn't at all a projection, but a separated and beautiful stranger..
Would the person notice that the beautiful stranger is his reflection in the mirror,
He wouldn't be able to notice the beauty anymore for the same reason he can't notice the beauty that he is, directly.
So people are eager to be dumb, so that they can have at least this little glimmer..
As people begun to endure spiritual experiences through distorted self projection,
They needed something worthy to define this awesome spirituality.
When they ran out of disappointments and options.
It was natural to conclude that it's invisible and it's roaming the sky's interacting with is from a distance..
The theories are numerous,
But I felt that this one deserves the spotlight..
Of you are familiar with the psychopathy syndrome,
One psychopath for each religion is enough to explain it all...
