@InfraBlue,
Quote:
So, you think that the Bible is not the literal "word of God," and that most of it was written by men who struggled to know God, but then you rationalize the flood story to reconcile it with the idea of a good and loving god.
I don't know if rationalizing is the right word, but yes, I am looking for reasons a loving God would do those things.
I don't know whether the story itself is literal or allegory but the point in either case would be that God would do anything necessary to preserve the results he wanted.
Quote:Why don't you just ascribe the flood story to those struggling men instead of engaging in mental contortions? Why do you hold on to that story so fiercely?
That is a possibility but if God wanted the story preserved in the bible it must mean he wanted it in. As I said above, it makes no difference whether the story is literal or allegory. The message is the same either way.
Same thing with the story of Job, Edgar.