Reply
Tue 24 Aug, 2004 02:54 pm
Reuters) - Top Pentagon officials and the military command in Iraq contributed to an environment in which prisoners were abused at Abu Ghraib prison, according to a report released on Tuesday by high-level panel investigating the military detentions. The outside four-member panel headed by former Defense Secretary James Schlesinger found that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and the Joint Chiefs of Staff failed to exercise proper oversight over confusing detention policies at U.S. prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
Well, some truth may come this inquiry after all. It looked for a while that a handful of small-fry dimwits would take the hit for the whole fiasco...
Thank you lady Justice!
Care to comment on this one, oh supporters of the admin?
Cycloptichorn
Cycloptichorn wrote:Thank you lady Justice!
Care to comment on this one, oh supporters of the admin?
Cycloptichorn
dammit cyclo, don't you understand we are at war???? save all of that "ethical preservation of our most basic american tenets crap for the second coming of "klintler"!!!
oh, zwolfie, wo bist du??
Re: the buck floats up
dyslexia wrote:Reuters) - Top Pentagon officials and the military command in Iraq contributed to an environment in which prisoners were abused at Abu Ghraib prison, according to a report released on Tuesday by high-level panel investigating the military detentions. The outside four-member panel headed by former Defense Secretary James Schlesinger found that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and the Joint Chiefs of Staff failed to exercise proper oversight over confusing detention policies at U.S. prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
I saw that this morning. Wonder why it is that we can only get news like this on the internet. You would think with the liberal media they would be only to eager to grap hold of a story like this.
Re: the buck floats up
revel wrote:You would think with the liberal media they would be only to eager to grap hold of a story like this.
oh, no... again with the liberal media.
unless you were just being a cheeky monkey. then it was a good one.
bah-rawk! fair and balanced! fair and balanced! bah-rawk!
Yea, that was my attempt at being cheeky. Sometimes I am too subtle I guess.
Well, it's all over the place now...
revel wrote:Yea, that was my attempt at being cheeky. Sometimes I am too subtle I guess.
o.k., just checking. it didn't seem to go with what you'd been saying.
my bad.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace