Reply
Thu 19 Aug, 2004 11:54 am
If only all the states would change their election laws to be rid of the winner take all and change to allocating electoral votes for the Electoral College. ---BBB
Plan would split Colorado's electoral votes
The Associated Press
August 17, 2004
DENVER -- A state plan to scrap the winner-take-all system of allocating electoral votes in Colorado is heading to the ballot in November.
If passed, Amendment 36 would make Colorado the first state to allocate electoral votes proportionately according to the popular vote, rather than giving a winner all of the state's electoral votes.
Secretary of State Donetta Davidson said Friday that supporters have gathered enough signatures to put the measure on the November ballot. If the proposal had been in place four years ago, Democrat Al Gore would have earned enough electoral votes to go to the White House. He got 266 electoral votes to President George W. Bush's 271.
Only two other states do not have winner-take-all systems of casting electoral college votes. Nebraska and Maine each give two votes to the winner and their remaining electoral college votes are cast according to who won each congressional district.
Republican Gov. Bill Owens and state party chairman Ted Halaby have criticized the proposal, saying it would lessen the state's clout in presidential elections. They warn candidates will ignore the state and its nine electoral votes if the measure passes.
Julie Brown, campaign director for the Make Your Vote Count effort that supports the measure, dismissed their concerns. "It begs the question on which is more important - a two-hour presidential stop at a tarmac at Denver International Airport or true representation by the voters."
Katy Atkinson, a spokeswoman for the opposing Coloradans Against a Really Stupid Idea, promised a challenge if the measure passes and is applied in this year's presidential race. The proposal's backers want it to take effect before Colorado's electoral votes are cast in December. "They are ripe for a court challenge on this," Atkinson said. "If this is a close race like the one four years ago, we could be thrown into a situation where we are the Florida of 2004. We'd be the laughingstock of the country. All those Florida jokes would be applied to Colorado."
I'm inclined to agree, BBB, which probably means I should reread the proposition. Costing the state clout in the presidental elections is a valid objection, but I'm failing to see the connection to the Florida count in 2004.