cavfancier wrote:Erm, yeah...I don't give it much credit really.
IS THE QUIZ A TRICK? Â…AND OTHER CRITICISMS OF, AND QUESTIONS ABOUT, THE QUIZ
Isn't this just a trick to get people to score "libertarian" - even if they're not libertarians at all -- so they'll think they're libertarians and support libertarian causes?
The number of people who've scored libertarian on your Web Quiz seems way out of proportion to what I'd expect. Isn't this an indication that the Quiz is flawed, inaccurate, or is just a trick to get people to score libertarian?
Doesn't the fact that the Quiz is used as an outreach tool by some libertarians mean that it isn't objective or accurate, and therefore has no real scholarly or practical value?
What about "Framing Bias?"
Are these leading questions? Do they avoid the hard issues?
The "Weed-Out" questions.
The "Invisible Question."
Why just 10 questions? Wouldn't more questions produce more accurate scores? Wouldn't longer questions, with more details, be better?
Why THOSE 10 questions and issues? Why not some other issues?
What about foreign policy? Why isn't there a section on this important issue in the Quiz?
Is something wrong with your counter? I noticed the number on it, took the Quiz, and when I checked back, the number hadn't increased at all. Then later I noticed the number had jumped by a huge number. What gives?
Pie Chart of results
FAQ
Endorsements
hope-for-homeless
Washington Post
Lest I be accused of some political agenda.......
I don't care whether any of you think as I do - and therefore have no motivation to persuade.
I visit here because I wish to view the opinions of those more intelligent and articulate than that which is so ubiquitous on the internet (the folks who participate in this forum appear to be intelligent, articulate, and thoughtful).
I observe the intellectual discourse on this forum as a means to avoid the filters of nationalistic media.....and am especially interested in the commentary of non-U.S. participants.
I posted this quiz only because so many on this board seem to have labeled themselves (directly or indirectly) as "liberal" or "conservative", when in fact they may be neither.