0
   

What is Love?

 
 
Reply Wed 11 Aug, 2004 06:55 pm
What is Love?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 4,823 • Replies: 88
No top replies

 
dauer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Aug, 2004 07:02 pm
A fragrance. From Calvin Klein.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Aug, 2004 07:09 pm
Love is that thing that seizes your heart and kicks the air out of your lungs. The thing that causes your palms to sweat and your ears to ring.

It is the stuff that dreams are made of.

It is, in a single word, capybara.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Aug, 2004 08:10 pm
Love in one sense is what the Greeks called the Divine Madness. It makes us coo coo.
0 Replies
 
bromeliad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Aug, 2004 08:21 pm
I think Haddaway asked that question a while back.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Aug, 2004 08:29 pm
From Shakespeare, "Oh, Mistress Mine":


What is love? ´Tis not hereafter;
Present mirth hath present laughter;
What´s to come is still unsure:
In delay there lies not plenty;
Then, come kiss me, sweet and twenty,
Youth´s a stuff will not endure.
0 Replies
 
Thalion
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Aug, 2004 03:26 pm
Wishing for the wellfare of yourself or another. Apathy is worse than hate, because in hate at least your fate has some significance to the person.
0 Replies
 
Yogi two
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Aug, 2004 03:54 pm
Arrow Love is when you have an unqualified concern for the welfare of another. It is best experienced when the concern is mutual, but that is not a requirement.
0 Replies
 
doglover
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Aug, 2004 03:58 pm
It is something that is priceless but can also be bought.
0 Replies
 
extra medium
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Aug, 2004 04:05 pm
doglover wrote:
It is something that is priceless but can also be bought.


Really? Where can you buy it?
0 Replies
 
doglover
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Aug, 2004 04:08 pm
Mr. Green

Ask gus.
0 Replies
 
agrote
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Aug, 2004 04:29 pm
I think giving a damn about the welfare of another person is only something that comes with loving them - it's not love itself.
0 Replies
 
extra medium
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Aug, 2004 06:10 pm
doglover wrote:
It is something that is priceless but can also be bought.


Actually, I think you are right, in a way. We hate to think of love as something that can be bought, but consider:

A very kind, thoughtful, good looking, yet penniless homeless man.
vs.
The same very kind, thoughtful, good looking, wealthy man with several mansions. He never has to work again.

I submit that the rich man will have way more opportunity to find romantic love. Blasphemy, how dare someone say that! Yes, I know there will be many goldiggers the rich man would need to filter out. But out of the many goldigger types, there just might be a few, maybe one, that would one day grow to love him, even though in the beginning she was in it just for the security, etc. Whereas, this one or two that might one day grow to love, wouldn't even consider hanging around and giving the homeless guy a chance in the first place.

In this respect, can money buy love, sort of? Or at least increase someone's odds for love? vs. If they are dead broke homeless?

Or perhaps money can help create and maintain the prerequisite minimum conditions necessary for long lasting love. You don't see too many homeless broke people who stay a couple for 50+ years in love.
0 Replies
 
Not Too Swift
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Aug, 2004 10:11 pm
Love is anything you like with a little bit extra.
0 Replies
 
InTraNsiTiOn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Aug, 2004 10:14 pm
Love is a misinterpreted version of infatuation. ( If that even makes sense, i've been trying to come up with something among these lines for about a week now)
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2004 07:37 am
love is an ephemeral ideal, representing the ultimate in affection; lying just beyond our grasp!

[or a four letter word, similar to 'lust'.]
0 Replies
 
Thalion
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2004 08:46 am
It seems as if almost everyone is interpretting "love" to mean only Romantic love. You can love your family and friends in an entirely non-romantic way. So those definitions alluding to lust (which isn't doesn't/shouldn't even constitutue all of what Romantic love is) only describe a small portion of what the word "love" means. If we are looking for a definition of "love", we cannot define it as something involving lust, because lust has no place in love. Even if lust is often the main factor in what we mistakenly name love in reality, it is not therefore part of the true definition of the word we are trying to define, but rather, a mistake on our own part in naming that which is lust "love".

Lust having no part in love, love is, as I and others have already stated, is an unconditional concern for something's wellfare.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2004 09:24 am
Love is a chemical reaction in your brain. It's purpose is to motivate you to behaviors that you may not do otherwise.

We evolved with love to ensure four things.

1) Human beings will have babies.
2) Men will protect their mate during the vulnerable time of pregnancy.
3) Parents will care for their children.
4) People work together in communal groups for protection and the benefits of working together so, as a community, there will be more offspring.

We have the trait of love for the same reason we have any other trait. It makes us more successful, as a species, at reproducing.
0 Replies
 
Thalion
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2004 09:34 am
Love is NOT the same thing as infatuation and has nothing to do with reproducing. Although sex can be an expression of love, it is not the driving force of love. Sex and love have come to mean the same thing although they are not the same idea. You can reproduce with someone that you have no love for, so therefore, sex CANNOT be identical to love.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2004 09:52 am
I disagree. Love has everything to do with reproducing.

You are right that sex is not "identical to" love. Sex is an important part of reproduction. Love is a motivation for sex (at least in my experience it is). But, of course love isn't the only motivation. Sex is so important to the survival of our species that nature provides additional motivations.

Biologically speaking, there is much more to reproduction than sex. Babies need you to care for them. Women need you to protect them when they are pregnant. Kids need guidance and resources. People need communities to help and share resources.

Love addresses all of the things that humans need to be sucessful at producing viable offspring and continuing the species.

Coitus, commitment, caring, community, providing, protection - These aspects of love are precisely the things that humans need to effectively produce viable offspring.

That's why we evolved to love.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What is Love?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 07:19:19