0
   

Democratic Party Should Live Up to Its Name

 
 
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:15 pm
Democratic Party Should Live Up to Its Name
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,906 • Replies: 20
No top replies

 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:21 pm
When Republicans do what they can to help get Nader on the ballot, Democrats can do what they can to stop him. He's a Republican pawn, though he'll never admit it...
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:22 pm
I agree with good old Ralph. The Dems and Reps have been trying to keep third parties off the ballot ever since Ross Perot took 15% of the vote. I guess eliminating them from the debates wasn't enough. Still can't justify voting for him, though.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:25 pm
Nader has a valid point. Just wish he would hold that thought....til the next election!
0 Replies
 
Redheat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:30 pm
Laughing Laughing

Nadar talking about living up to something! theres a hoot.

Nadars credibility stands at a whopping 0 on this, a man who whores himself out to the Republicans and willingly lets them use him like a 2 bit hooker doesn't have any room to talk about living up to any standard.

He really should shut up while he's behind, that is if he wishes to salvage an ounce of dignity.

It's really too bad, he was widely respected once and now he's becoming a laughing stock.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:30 pm
this truly is a time when all arguments need to be suspended to work for one goal....and this goal is getting bush out......afer bush is out I will go back to being a libertarian....but this year I'm a democrat!!!!!
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:32 pm
McGentrix,

I agree with this article completely. I just wish someone else posted it. You are making my stance more difficult.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:33 pm
Why? You can agree with what I post without agreeing with me.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:35 pm
McG,

I should've put a smiley.

I have agreed with you several times and I don't mind it at all. After all, no one can be wrong all the time Wink
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:36 pm
Such clarity McG. Kudos
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:45 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
McG,

I should've put a smiley.

I have agreed with you several times and I don't mind it at all. After all, no one can be wrong all the time Wink


Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Chuckster
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:51 pm
Such magnaminity in overwhelming victory is so admirable.You are all models of true Democrat behavior.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 12:58 pm
Take a break Chucky :wink:
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 03:13 pm
Quote:
Though the Democrats have the right to robustly oppose my independent presidential campaign, they don't have the right to engage in dirty tricks designed to deny millions of voters the opportunity to choose who should be the next president.


That is a telling phrase. Since Nader can not possibly win the election and he knows it, he must be talking about helping to elect Bush. He is one first class phony.

Quote:
We are the only serious candidates------------


A serious candidate is one that has even an outside chance to win not one that may get 4% of the vote. His voice is like a fart in a windstorm.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 05:25 pm
I had to giggle at this thread. It is so damn hard to admit we agree with somebody who has infuriated us for months. But shoot, if we all weren't so partisan and committed to getting one guy or the other one elected, we probably really do agree on most things.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 07:11 pm
au1929 wrote:
Quote:
Though the Democrats have the right to robustly oppose my independent presidential campaign, they don't have the right to engage in dirty tricks designed to deny millions of voters the opportunity to choose who should be the next president.


That is a telling phrase. Since Nader can not possibly win the election and he knows it, he must be talking about helping to elect Bush. He is one first class phony.

Quote:
We are the only serious candidates------------


A serious candidate is one that has even an outside chance to win not one that may get 4% of the vote. His voice is like a fart in a windstorm.


Bull Au,

We have been through this before. Nader gives progressive voters a voice. Kerry continues to slap the progressive left in the face with his idiotic statements on the war-- even today.

I am pissed that neither candidate represents me-- Kerry doesn't even have the balls to try.

Nader has already won in my book. He is raising the very debate that the Democrats are trying to hide from, but it needs to be raised.

If the democrats decide to develop a backbone and stand for something, it will have been worth it. If the Democrats decide to keep whining about any who questions them... well screw them. It's not even worth it.
0 Replies
 
Chuckster
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 08:17 pm
This is a contest a urologist would really love.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 08:30 pm
A gay urologists dream...a lot of pissing and a bunch of dicks ......that's politics :wink:
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Aug, 2004 10:23 pm
Whole thing is sorta amusin', really. Dems as a whole are fine with Bush-bashin', pressed the daylights out of The President's National Guard Service with nothing more substantial to go on than some foggy record-keeping, practically invented the 527 PACs, rant about equal access to the political process, then freak when sworn testimony from scores of reputable individuals challenging their annointed one's putative valor comes up, someone outside the 2 main parties tries to access the political process, and soft money goes to the Republicans. There are no innocents in politics, and those most stridently claiming grievance tend typically to be themselves among the least innocent of perpetrating the wrongs of which they complain.
0 Replies
 
Chuckster
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Aug, 2004 03:23 am
Amazing! Tim's head rarely left his body more than 6 times during that recitation.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Democratic Party Should Live Up to Its Name
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 03:53:37