3
   

Would you assassinate Hitler?

 
 
dlowan
 
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 07:42 am
OK - you are sitting in a Munich beer hall in the late 1920's. At the next table to yours is a group of rather nasty looking men. One of them is Adolf Hitler - poised to take his gang of Munich thugs to dizzy heights - in 1933 he will snatch the Chancellorship of Germany - the rest is history...

You are a time traveller, from now. You know what the future holds for this man.

You have a gun. You can kill him, now.

Would you?

You are an ethical being - should you? Do you have the right to?

(For the purposes of this discussion we will assume that you can do so without negative consequences for the future - our now. This is not about time travel ethics. We shall also assume you can either escape instantly, or stay and face the music - your choice. Nobody else will be injured.)

This discussion rose out of a thread where assassintion of Hussein was briefly discussed - I thought it was a cleaner ethical dilemma to site the choice in the past...)
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 3 • Views: 9,962 • Replies: 136
No top replies

 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 07:47 am
Quote:
For the purposes of this discussion we will assume that you can do so with negative consequences for the future - our now.


Is that what you meant, or was it a typo? What would be the negative condsequences for the future?

Anyhow, given your scenario, I would kill that SOB in a heartbeat, if I had to do it with my bare hands! Mad
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 08:05 am
Thanks Phoenix! Freudian slip!

So - that would mean logically that someone who saw George Bush II as a likely crazed killer - as some truly do - would be entitled to kill him?
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 08:08 am
That's the problem with hypotheticals. They're just so damned hypothetical.

Since I cannot condone killing in any way, shape, or form, my answer is no.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 08:14 am
Well,
a) I'm against killing in any form,
b) since all what Hitler did until then was either legal or had already been taken legal action against before ... why?
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 08:17 am
Bunny- Now you are changing the rules in the middle of the game. Your original premise in this thread was would you kill Hitler, based upon what we know about Hitler now. Nothing was said about being entitled to kill him.

Would I have been entitled to kill Hitler, based on what I know about him now? Absolutely. Would I have been entitled to kill him at that time, not knowing the future, because I thought that he might become a dangerous guy? Absolutely not!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 08:35 am
I haven't changed anything! I am still positing a time-traveller! How did the rules change? I am just being a devil's advocate...

OK- Iraq II goes ahead - with terrible civilian casualties - would a time traveller from Iraq - (what is left of it) - in 2010 - have the right to pop back and take George II out in his college years?

Oh - I see what you mean - perhaps I was imprecise - I assumed people would discuss ethical entitlement to kill him...

OK - I have edited again - thank you for that function, Craven!

Walter - you are from the future - you KNOW what Hitler will assist to occur - still no right?
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:18 am
Well, of course, Deb. Kill Bush while he's in college, and let Saddam continue to develope. The analogy seems a little weak, actually.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:21 am
Well, we can talk about killing Saddam if you like...

Roger - the point of the exercise was simply to debate about the rights and wrongs of assassinating political leaders.

Hitler was used as an example because most people feel pretty clear about him, and we know his history.

Bush was used as an example simply to be a devil's advocate.

I would be happy to use John Howard - but how many know who he is? And he is likely to be responsible for a lot less deasths than Bush or Saddam....
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:23 am
MSA
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:26 am
Huh?
0 Replies
 
hebba
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:36 am
I think he may mean "my sweet arse".
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:38 am
Oh! oh well, can't please them all.
0 Replies
 
hebba
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:40 am
Of course,dlowan,I may be WAY off the mark.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:42 am
I suspect not!
0 Replies
 
hebba
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 09:44 am
I´m rather looking forward to Roger clearing this up for us.
Oooh the anticipation.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 10:11 am
Motion (made)
Seconded
(and) Approved

(Common shorthand method while taking minutes of meetings.)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 10:15 am
Oh.
0 Replies
 
hebba
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 10:16 am
My Sweet Arse was more fun Roger.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2003 10:22 am
I might just kill the man. I am unable to kill spiders, trap mice, I couldn't finish off an animal if I'd hit it and it was still alive. I can only kill tics and mosquitoes. I'd kill Hitler.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Would you assassinate Hitler?
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 09/23/2020 at 03:25:33